Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

KristenNorway

Newbies
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Relationship status
    No Answer
  • State (US/Canadian)
    Not Specified
  • Country
    Not Specified
  • Copyright
    Copyrighted

KristenNorway's Achievements

Novice

Novice (2/7)

0

Reputation

  1. No. It means that if we could not say something about an objects future (because of it's potentiall to "jump out of existence"), we will experience the object's future as "random".
  2. I wrote it down in a hurry, sorry. I meant: "I own a property and will do something with it. Unfortunatly, x will buy a part of the property. If I not sell a part of the property to him, I will "force" his mind to consider another option". Why is this type of force acceptable?
  3. Hi. I was debating with a socialist some days ago and he challenged me about force/property. He said something like this: "I own a property and will do something with it. Unfortunatly, x will buy a part of the property." What would a good objectvist respons be? Kristen
  4. I don't know much about physics but isn't such "jumping" observed in the field of quantum physics?
  5. The law of casualty of course ... But what if all things can potentially "jump out of existence"? The things' future will then be "random". What is the objectivist respons?
×
×
  • Create New...