Jose
Regulars-
Posts
118 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Jose
-
That is an ad hominem, you are evaluating an argument using completely irrelevant facts From the other thread someone said that contradiction are possible and impossible at the same time. I try to know what he means and he start trolling. The solutions I give were that he was using a contradiction resistant logic, later I think that he is meaning a kind of Hegelian dialectic. In this thread, people went out of there way to evade my concern and even said that subjective criteria, could be used but don’t give a guidelines of when. Or when I explain the example said that I was moving the goal post. I really try to learn who Rand’s handle this scenario because is extremely simple so it was logical for me to look at what I’m missing. After both threads my only way to understand what is going on is that you guys just ignore and sweep under the rug everything that do not fit in your worldview.
-
So let me see... If one were to make an addition to an equation, that would not be the same as a change? But somehow only you would arrive at the same answer. This is utterly irrational. That I did was not a change, it was a clarification. The question is who does Objectivist interpret reality when you need a subjective fact? What I give was an example, and offer a second one. You can use which criteria do you want to explore ...
-
The scenario has not change ... what I offer was to come with an additional scenario (that means two, the original one and the new one) so it’s an expansion rather than a change. Having a way of provide a way to know when to use a subjective criteria. That is a whole point. The list of criteria is not relevant ... what is important is that they are the same. Same distance, same menu, same cost, same atmosphere, same furniture ...