Just FYI guys!
mperkel came on over to www.infidelguy.com forum and started his crap about Objectvist. Here is his pittyfull attempt to paint Objectvist as hypocrites..
If you wanna read the last three or four pages and watch his downfall at (not to toot my own horn) my hands it's pretty funny.
In a nut shell he was saying that Objectivist are a cult because they do not accept the current definition of selfish. I tried to explain to him that Rand was simply defaulting back to an earlier definition of selfish as she explains in AVoS. But he persisted. Knowing that this guy is an atheist I asked him if he agreed with the current definition of atheist. Which according to webster, in the first definition are the words "archaic" and "wickedness".
I asked him if he agreed with that definition and he said no. I said so Objectivism is a cult because they reject the current definition of selfish but atheist according to you get a pass for doing the same thing with the word atheism? He did not answer the question even though I put it in front of him many times.
Also, he capitalized the word atheist repeatedly. Too many times for it to be mistaken as a typo. When asked why, he did not answer that either.
Also, I asked him what does he do with his extra income that he has left over after he pays for the basic needs of survival. He said that he spends it on entertainment. I called him a greedy bastard. He said that that wasn't greed it was " self interest ". I asked him at what point does self interest stop being self interest and start being greed. He said once he has had his "fair share".
And yes I asked him to define fair share and guess what? He refused again to answer the question and he has with drew his contradictory incoherent pityfull self from the thread.