Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Craig24

Regulars
  • Content count

    505
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Craig24 last won the day on December 31 2017

Craig24 had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Craig24

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday 09/19/1965

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Country
    United States
  • State (US/Canadian)
    Pennsylvania
  • Relationship status
    No Answer
  • Sexual orientation
    No Answer
  • Real Name
    Craig
  • Copyright
    Copyrighted

Recent Profile Visitors

4906 profile views
  1. Craig24

    Isn't inheritance theft?

    Short answer: no Long answer: You launched into a lecture about the morality of squandering one's inherited wealth and compared it to squandering one's stolen wealth. You needed to separate the two things. How one obtains wealth is not related to how one uses it. Inheritance by definition is getting what a dead person willed you to get. You had the owner's permission to get it. That's not theft by any objective meaning of the concept. I could squander earned wealth too. Does that make earning it in the first place theft?
  2. Craig24

    Are Pick Up Artists Legitimate Artists?

    I guess some pua's can move women emotionally. Not sure if I would trust a pua if I was a woman. Some of the advice on how to become attractive is ok but most of the "art" is manipulative and deceptive.
  3. Craig24

    Why follow reason?

    She identified rationality as the primary virtue, the one virtue that keeps men alive. Her concern was not to describe what men actually choose but what they can and SHOULD choose.
  4. Craig24

    Race Realism

    FYI, Objectivism is NOT egalitarianism. It is individualist. It wants all rewards to be earned by ability and honest work. It does not want all the spoils to be shared by everyone equally regardless of ability or the amount and quality of work done like the egalitarians do.
  5. Craig24

    Sex and Trade

    Be attractive to her and she will respond by desiring sex then you will not even have to ask for it.
  6. This article from 4 years ago is eye opening: Perpetuating the Lie
  7. Strawman. It isn't about this at all. It's about being objective when comparing governments. Is it possible to evaluate two governments side by side or not? Is it possible to reason that Singapore is better than Venezuela?
  8. I must assume that you meant "that's NOT a reason to say capitalism fails for the pharmaceutical industry."
  9. Craig24

    Universals

    Interesting. What's the problem as you see it?
  10. Craig24

    Universals

    Is it proper to say that individual trees are not concepts they are just trees but the concept tree objectively refers to the particular trees? In the same way, a similarity (the common denominator that makes a tree a tree) is not a universal it is just a similarity but the universal (treeness) objectively refers to the similarity. Is that really all that hard when you think about it?
  11. Craig24

    Universals

    Particulars or concretes exist. How do you know universals do? Perhaps more to the point, how do you know that similarities are universals?
  12. Craig24

    The Law of Identity

    Ok but there are allegedly conscious states about the following: God, near death experience, astral projection, reincarnation. That's just off the top of my head. Isn't it special pleading to make sex transitioning an exception? You're an Objectivist for crying out loud. Act like one.
  13. Craig24

    Correcting the nonaggression "principle"

    What do you mean by that right? The right to property is a single right, not potentially a billion different little rights. Just one. Did you alienate your property rights? No. You only alienated an object. Rights don't refer to objects. You can still act to gain,keep, use and dispose of material values. That didn't change with any trade you choose to make. The only way you could alienate your rights is by enslaving yourself or killing yourself. I think Rand does object to that strongly.
  14. Craig24

    Correcting the nonaggression "principle"

    Oh no this isn't correct. A right to property, according to Rand, is: In your particular example, you exercised the right to dispose of the toothbrush. You also exercised the right to earn the money that paid for the toothbrush. You didn't alienate any right, you alienated the toothbrush.
  15. Craig24

    Correcting the nonaggression "principle"

    Two parties agree to trade. Party 1 makes the trade but Party 2 refuses to complete the trade. Party 2 is keeping Party 1's property by force. That's the indirect force. That seems simple enough. Am I missing something Invictus2017?
×