Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Jayla Lyn

Regulars
  • Content Count

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Jayla Lyn

  • Rank
    Newbie

Previous Fields

  • Country
    Not Specified
  • State (US/Canadian)
    Not Specified
  • Relationship status
    No Answer
  • Copyright
    Copyrighted
  • School or University
    Grand Canyon University
  • Occupation
    Maintenance
  1. The ongoing issue is the need for Transsexual's to use the restroom of there real gender without bias or pursecution. The DSM-IV requires it. This means that a bunch of people a whole lot smarter than me, got together and figured it out and that is what they came up with. Is it law, not to my knowledge. Should it be MADE law, that is up for debate. I am arguing that this be allowed. The argument that inspector made is a generalized one, based on the acts of the few, to screw over the many. It's not fair, but there it is. You agree with arguement, and that is your right. However, it's an assumption, as neither you nor I can say what ALL other trans people have in mind when going in the restroom. I know from my PERSONAL experience, that when going to the restroom, i go to relieve myself. I can only guess, that when I start using the womens room, that will be the same goal I have. I do not have anything more "general" to propose. I do not have the answers here. I do know that it's not right to be prosecuted for using the bathroom. "It doesn't offend me, it's just kind of pointless to point your arguments toward one particular person or formulation when there's next to no chance of getting that person to respond. If you think he made an error in principle and you have an argument against that, then point out the principle you think he's using and refute it, using your own experience as a base. That way you can get some constructive discussion from people other than the original person." I am sorry. Apparently you feel strongly about this. My points are valid. I am not actually expecting a response from that particular individual. I am writing what I write for all to see. If someone agrees with Inspectors point of view then what I write is directed at them. Plus isn't it MY time to waste in replying to someone that might never reply back? Hopefully this will put an end to the nonsence of "why" i am posting and get us back on the subject of the thread. Bottom line, my personal reasons for posting are mine alone.
  2. Catch a clue? This is an ongoing issues. I dont' care if the person posted yesterday or years ago. My comments are still valid. The fact that I am "resuurrecting" an old thread is because this is an area in my personal life that I feel strongly about. Sorry if it has offended you.
  3. It simply is as you put it, an "assumption". Those that are transexuals are usually on hormones or HRT as it's called. With this medication, the sex drives becomes nonexistant. There fore I can safely and correctly say that going to the womans restroom during the year, "Real Life Test", is simply a matter of relieving oneself. Please everyone, do your research. I am a transsexual. I am living this, I can tell you from personal experience that, if I go into the womans restroom, which I have not done yet due to not having the ability to pass, it will be a matter of relieving myself and not interested in seeing the women in there for any reason at all. Again please do your research regarding these matters. So many people on this subject have some things right but alot of things wrong. It's disheartening to see that we as a community are not more informed. Point of fact: transsexuals are not only men transitioning to women but also women transitioning to men.
  4. But your not offering truth here. Your offering an opinion with out any factual statements at all. You are DARING to off an OPINION, and your hoping others will jump on the "inspector" band wagon. Sorry not going to happen.
×
×
  • Create New...