Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Jason Stotts

Regulars
  • Content count

    313
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Jason Stotts

  1. by Jason Stotts In case you haven’t heard of it yet, Harvard Psychologist Steven Pinker has a new book out defending the enlightenment and the progress that humanity has made since then called “Enlightenment Now”. The blurb for it is: Is the world really falling apart? Is the ideal of progress obsolete? In this elegant assessment of the human condition in the third millennium, cognitive scientist and public intellectual Steven Pinker urges us to step back from the gory headlines and prophecies of doom, which play to our psychological biases. Instead, follow the data: In seventy-five jaw-dropping graphs, Pinker shows that life, health, prosperity, safety, peace, knowledge, and happiness are on the rise, not just in the West, but worldwide. This progress is not the result of some cosmic force. It is a gift of the Enlightenment: the conviction that reason and science can enhance human flourishing. Far from being a naïve hope, the Enlightenment, we now know, has worked. But more than ever, it needs a vigorous defense. The Enlightenment project swims against currents of human nature–tribalism, authoritarianism, demonization, magical thinking–which demagogues are all too willing to exploit. Many commentators, committed to political, religious, or romantic ideologies, fight a rearguard action against it. The result is a corrosive fatalism and a willingness to wreck the precious institutions of liberal democracy and global cooperation. With intellectual depth and literary flair, Enlightenment Now makes the case for reason, science, and humanism: the ideals we need to confront our problems and continue our progress. The book does a great job showing how much progress we have made and that the world is getting better everyday. This is an important message at a time when all we hear is how things are coming apart at the seams. While I do have some reservations about the book (which Robert Tracinski does a better job of discussing that I likely would have), I do think it’s a worthwhile read and worth picking up. Link to Original
  2. by Jason Stotts It’s now been just over 6 months since Eros and Ethos: A New Theory of Sexual Ethics came out! I am happy to report that so far the book is selling well and the reviews have been good. To date, we are just shy of our 200th copy! Currently, most people are buying ebooks (75%), with the rest of the sales being paperbacks. Moreover, the reviews have been really wonderful with a score of 4.5 out of 5 and 13 reviews (the overall score was brought down by 1 negative and unsubstantial review). Here are just a couple of the really nice things people are saying: “Get ready for the first part of a very thoughtful and enlightening ride. I can’t wait for the next installment to arrive!” “I was raised in a sex shaming household, and it is very difficult to live with conflicting thoughts about my own sexuality, desires, and societal pressures. This book is imperative for anyone struggling to reconcile their sexuality with morality.” “This is an important book for anyone seeking a rational approach to sex” “This was a fantastic book, an excellent purchase, and well worth my time.” “This is a vastly important (and possibly life-changing) book for anyone floundering and/or seeking growth and happiness within a romantic/erotic relationship.” “I’ve never read anything related to the topic of sex that addresses the subject so thoroughly, so positively, or so helpfully.” “Bottom line, an excellent addition to my library. Suitable for academics and laymen alike.” Go take a look at the full comments yourself, they’re amazingly kind and speak highly of the book. The audiobook has been delayed due to production issues, but I hope to find a new narrator soon (if you’re interested, let me know). No current ETA on the audiobook, but I’ll be sure to announce it when there’s something more definite. Overall, I’ve very happy with the launch and I hope that the sales keep climbing as new people read the book and recommend it to their friends. If you’ve already read the book, please take a second to leave a review, it makes a big difference and I love seeing them. Link to Original
  3. by Jason Stotts I will be giving a talk in Denver Colorado coming up on Saturday July 28th. The details of which are below: Our culture is rife with myths about love. While many of these myths, such as the idea of “soul mates” seem innocuous enough, they can cause significant harm in the lives of people who believe them. In this talk, we will explore some of these myths and the harm they cause. Afterwards, we will look at what healthy love looks like so that we will be more likely to find it in our own lives. The talk will be at Rodolfo Gonzalez Library (1498 Irving St, Denver, CO 80204) from 3:30pm-4:30pm. It will be roughly 30-45 minutes in length and will be followed by a Q&A. After the talk, around 5:15pm, there will be a dinner with lively conversation. The dinner is at Tap and Burger Sloans Lake (565 N. Raleigh St. #100, Denver, CO 80204), which is about a 6 minute drive from the venue. This talk grows out of my new book Eros and Ethos: A New Theory of Sexual Ethics. A limited number of copies of the book will also be available at the talk. You can RSVP for the event on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/events/442609279541867/), but an RSVP is not required to attend. The event is free to attend. Link to Original
  4. Jason Stotts

    Re-blogged post:Aporia: Dispositions

    My blog auto-posts to the forum and as I do not often come on here, it's a better idea to comment on the blog itself if you want me to see it. Action causation= Humean billiard balls Agent causation = entities acting in accordance with their identity The primary difference is where you put the locus of action and change, but it has profound differences for how you think about causation. The sentence about dispositions. Are dispositions more about the DESIRE that drives them or more about the ACTION that results from them.
  5. by Jason Stotts Aporia (ἀπορɛία): an impasse, puzzlement, doubt, or confusion; a difficulty encountered in establishing the theoretical truth of a proposition, created by the presence of evidence both for and against it. In this Aporia, I want to inquire into the nature of dispositions. While this outline is undoubtedly not of general interest, it will be of interest to some and from it (hopefully) a clear statement about dispositions will emerge for Eros and Ethos Volume 2. Are all dispositions psychological in nature? It seems like they might be Even Aristotle’s Act1/Act2 is only dispositional when applied to people A rock doesn’t have Act1 – it is either rolling or it is not. At the same time, a rock could be position such that it could potentially roll, would that be Act1? But rocks cannot act – it must be acted upon. But is this action causation instead of entity causation? No, rocks are the kinds of entities such that they are not self-moved None living things cannot have dispositions It seems that only living things can have dispositions. Can non-human animals have dispositions? Need to have a better idea of what they are before we can answer this If dispositions are psychological in nature, how exactly do they operate? As automatic preferences? In Vol 1, claimed orientation was a disposition and it has a biological component This could still be an automatic preference shaped partly by forces beyond our control (biology) Does this make dispositions no more than something like a “preferential habit”? If I purposefully develop a habit around eating healthy and this changes my preferences to healthy eating, is this then a new disposition? I’d say yes. But only at the point the person’s actual preferences change If dispositions are about preferences, they seem to be another form of “automatic thought” and a way to offload things out of consciousness to keep the conscious mind more focused and available to respond to bigger issues If this is true, then they are much like the sentiments which attempt to automate evaluation and orient us to the world They are also a little like intuition, but whereas intuition is a true automatic thought (has conceptual content), dispositions activate our desires Is it right to say they activate our desires? If I have a disposition to do A, is that the same as saying that I have an established desire to do A? It doesn’t seem so Perhaps the difference is that if we have consciously established the A-preference and desire, then this is not a disposition, but an internalized preference. If that’s the case, though, how would we ever come to have disposition? If we can’t come to have them consciously. Maybe dispositions aren’t things we choose directly, but as in the case of health, we choose to be healthy and our preferences (hopefully!) change to healthy options, without us having to decide on a case-by-case basis If this is the case, then dispositions cannot be things we consciously have chosen, but they are things that “fall out” of other choices This seems too chaotic and messy. Unless it’s the case that the only way we can form dispositions is through an associated purposeful internalization of a preference scheme (e.g., wanting to be “healthy” also entails lots of associated things) When we say that we are “disposed to help someone” we usually mean that the person in question reminds us of someone that we liked in our past or that we believe that this person is a good person based on our own belief system and, so, we have a desire to help them. It can’t be the case that we internalize this kind of thing antecedently, since we will not have met the particular person in question before. The desire in question is not necessarily strong, but enough that we can say that we “want to” help them or feel “pulled” to help them and these should both be understood as kinds of desire This seems like a good example of an automatic preference Conversely, it can be that the person in question is disposed to harm the other person (or at least disposed to not help) because they remind them of someone they do not like This still is a desire, just that this time it is a desire to “not aid” or even harm the other person When we say that a parent is disposed to help their children, we do not mean that the parent has consciously worked to set up an internalized conscious choice. Rather, we mean that our biological makeup is such that parents will have an automatic preference to help their own children. This seems right. What have we discovered about dispositions then? They are a form of automatic desire Much like the sentiments (evaluation) or intuition (cognition) These desires are usually held as preferences (a “liking” of one thing over another), which is a form of desire Link to Original
  6. by Jason Stotts My very first blog post was on May 8th, 2005, 13 years ago today. That was back before blogs were popular. In the intervening 13 years, I saw the rise and fall of blogging as a popular medium and now it seems that most people have moved to podcasts and youtube videos. Yet, Erosophia persists. Not that I’ve been blogging much, although that should increase soon. Erosophia’s 13th year saw some really big changes. The biggest is obviously that Eros and Ethos: A New Theory of Sexual Ethics has finally been published and is now available on Amazon. So far, sales have been pretty solid and the reviews are excellent. I’ve also been interviewed one podcast so far and have several other podcast appearances lined up for the coming weeks. In this coming year, I hope to finish several essays related to Eros and Ethos, finish the principal draft of Volume 2 on practical issues in sexual ethics, and do more interviews to help build the audience for Eros and Ethos. If you want to keep track of what I’m doing, you can sign up for my newsletter, which I send out a couple of times a year. If you want to support Erosophia in some way or help with Eros and Ethos, contact me. Link to Original
  7. by Jason Stotts I am releasing a minor update to Eros and Ethos, details of which can be found in the changelog. It will start with an update to the ebook effective today. The ebook will also be getting a new cover, due to the old cover violating advertising TOS against “nudity” and us being unable to use it in ads. The paperback will be updated sometime in the next week, once I get an updated proof and make sure the update won’t break anything in the print edition. That said, if you want a true first edition paperback, you had better order it now as they won’t be available much longer. To celebrate this update, the ebook will be on sale for $4.99. Note: If you have already purchased the ebook, you can update to v1.1 for free by following this guide. Link to Original
  8. by Jason Stotts I will be appearing LIVE on the Objectivist Discussions show tomorrow at 2pm EST (11am PST) to talk about my new book “Eros and Ethos: A New Theory of Sexual Ethics.” The interview will also be recorded and available on YouTube afterwards. If you have any questions about the book you’d like us to cover, feel free to email me with them and we’ll try to get to them. Link to Original
  9. by Jason Stotts Are you part of a reading group, student group, or even a group of friends who want to read Eros and Ethos? If so, I am now offering discounted paperbacks to groups who want to read it. Who qualifies? Established reading groups Book clubs Student groups Academic departments Other groups (decided on a per-group basis) What do you get? Your group/organization can purchase copies of Eros and Ethos for $9 per copy, including free shipping That’s nearly 1/2 off the regular price of $14.95 when you factor in free shipping Note: this cannot be combined with special copies, including signed copies How to get started? Email me at [email protected] Please include some information about your group in your email What’s the catch? You must order at least 5 books Currently limited to the continental US Other locations can take advantage of the discounted books, but will pay more for shipping Note: This is a limited time offer and it may be discontinued without notice. Link to Original
  10. by Jason Stotts It’s been exactly one (short) month since Eros and Ethos was released and it seems like a good time to talk about how things are going. In short, they’re going well. As you can see in the graph (click to make it bigger), the ebook (orange) launched first and sold well. The paperback (grey) launched after and has been holding steady. Amazon reports paperback sales on the day they ship, so there’s a lag for the books to print and ship reflected in the data. Interestingly, the majority of sales (63%) are ebook and 37% are paperback. In total, there have been 62 total sales in only 28 days, which is a solid start. Reviews are all very good so far. The book is currently at 4.8/5 stars with 7 reviews. Reviews at this stage are critical for helping to pick up new readers that may not be familiar with my work, so if you’ve already read it, please leave me a review. Even just a couple of sentences is enough and it makes a big difference. All signed and numbered copies have been shipped. If you have not received yours, please contact me. Numbered copies are half sold and I’m currently sold out of signed copies (with more coming soon!). All in all, I’m pretty happy with the launch and I look forward to increasing sales as word of the book spreads. If you haven’t gotten your copy yet, now’s the time! Link to Original
  11. by Jason Stotts Many people have been asking me about the paperback and I am delighted to announce that the paperback version of Eros & Ethos: A New Theory of Sexual Ethics is now available on Amazon! This book is the product of a decade of work on my part and it’s the best thing I’ve ever done. Seriously, it’s really good. Of course, you shouldn’t take my word for it, check it out for yourself. Anyone who has ordered a special edition directly from me will be getting theirs soon. I have ordered quite a few copies and they have to ship to me first, then I’ll need to sign them and get them shipped out. I’ll update those people who have ordered special editions directly via email when their package ships. Two things to note: Amazon tells me that the book may take up to 48hrs to appear in the different marketplaces (e.g. Amazon.de). Amazon also informs me that it may take up to 72hrs for the paperback version and the ebook version to appear on the same sales page. This is important if you with to buy both as once they’re on the same sales page, you’ll have the option to buy the paperback and only pay $2.99 for the ebook. Link: http://amzn.to/2Gx1dbJ Link to Original
  12. by Jason Stotts I am so incredibly happy to report that, thanks to you, Eros and Ethos is already a bestseller in two categories on Amazon in the first 24 hours after release! Thank you all so much for your support. If you haven’t gotten your copy yet, now is the time. Join me, and all the other people who have already purchased the book, and see what all the excitement is about. Link to Original
  13. by Jason Stotts I am thrilled to announce that “Eros and Ethos: A New Theory of Sexual Ethics” is officially published and available for sale in ebook format now (here). The paperback edition will be available in a week or so and I’ll post an update when it’s live. Once you read it, and you’re thoroughly impressed (as you will be), please leave me a review on Amazon. Feel free to also reach out to me with any questions or comments. If you find any errors, please let me know right away. My contact information is on the contact page as well as in the front of the book. Also, if you want a signed copy of the paperback or one of limited numbered and signed copies, check out the Special Editions page. Link to Original
  14. by Jason Stotts One of the things that I think people often fail to understand about markets is that literally every good is affected by every other. A change in the price of oil will change the price of wool. A regulation about coffee in Brazil will change the price of cars in America. Everything that affects a market at all will be felt in the price of every good or service in the market. Perhaps the effect will be larger or smaller, but if you do anything in a market, rest assured you are having an impact. I think this short movie does a good job of illustrating this fact in a very benevolent way and I encourage everyone to take a look at it. Capitalism is the only system of individual rights ever conceived; it is the only moral system of human interaction. Link to Original
  15. by Jason Stotts I’ve decided to end the current Goodreads giveaway early…so that I can give away MORE BOOKS! If you haven’t entered the current giveaway, tomorrow is the last day to do so. Watch out for a new giveaway starting soon! (Link) Goodreads Book Giveaway Eros and Ethos by Jason Stotts Giveaway ends December 05, 2017. See the giveaway details at Goodreads. Enter Giveaway Link to Original
  16. by Jason Stotts I am thrilled to announce that as of today, the pre-order is now live on Amazon! Pre-order for the ebook is here: http://amzn.to/2AAwtV0. The pre-order for the print book will be available soon. If you’re interested in ordering special editions, like signed copies or a limited edition numbered run, see this page: http://jasonstotts.com/eros-ethos/signed-copies-special-edition/ There will be several contests in the lead up to the book launch. The first is that there are 3 signed copies being given away on Goodreads. Enter to win here: link. There will other contests announced soon, so watch for them. You can find more information about the book at http://jasonstotts.com/eros-ethos/ or ErosandEthos.com. Link to Original
  17. by Jason Stotts There is a new giveaway on Goodreads for my forthcoming book “Eros and Ethos: A New Theory of Sexual Ethics”. There are 3 signed copies available to win, so head on over and get registered. Goodreads Book Giveaway Eros and Ethos by Jason Stotts Giveaway ends February 08, 2018. See the giveaway details at Goodreads. Enter Giveaway (In case the widget doesn’t work, the link is: https://www.goodreads.com/giveaway/show/263146-eros-and-ethos-a-new-theory-of-sexual-ethics?utm_content=button&utm_medium=email&utm_source=giveaway_shelved_book_36514860) Link to Original
  18. by Jason Stotts I am so very pleased to finally be announcing the immanent publication of Eros and Ethos. It has been nearly 10 years in the making and I think it’s simply amazing. I hope you will as well. Pre-orders for the ebook will go live on November 11th on Amazon. At that time, I’ll update this with a link to the book. The ebook will be published on February 9th. It will be available for purchase and available via Kindle Select for the first 90 days. After that, it will also be available through other outlets. The ebook will launch in all Amazon markets concurrently (including Canada, the UK, Australia, etc.). It will only be available in English at launch, but may be available in other languages in the future. The paperback version of the book will be available soon after (details to be finalized soon). Anyone who purchases the paperback through amazon will have the option to concurrently buy a discounted version of the ebook for an additional $2.99. *People buying signed copies should be able to get discount ebooks as well (would either have to directly email them or find a way to do discount codes through Amazon) There will be 50 special signed and numbered copies available for purchase directly through Erosophia on (hopefully) launch day. These can also be pre-ordered so that you can be guaranteed one. They will be $50 each and will help support my work and will go a long way to getting Volume 2 out. These are also already 20% sold, so don’t wait too long if you want one. Regular signed paperbacks will also be available through Erosophia for $20 plus shipping. Here is the description: [Blurb] Link to Original
  19. by Jason Stotts It saddened me today to learn that Hugh Hefner died last night. I have written about Hefner before (link) and his role in both civil rights and sexual freedoms. Hefner was a great pioneer in the sexual field and really helped to change our culture for the better with respect to sexuality. For anyone who has not seen it, I recommend the Amazon series “American Playboy” that tells much of Hefner’s story. What I find most remarkable about Hefner, aside from his strong stance on civil rights and sexual freedoms, is that he wrote and defended his beliefs about sexual ethics in “The Playboy Philosophy.” (For example, you can see him debate William Buckley on sexual ethics here.) What is so great about this is that he was attempting to shift the debate around sexuality to a philosophic level and out of the emotive reactionism and moral panic of the past. Whether he succeeded or not is moot, but in so doing, he blazed the way for others to write on the topic and helped to shift the culture. There is a strong sense in which Hefner paved the way for books like mine and I will be forever in his debt for this. So, thank you Mr. Hefner. You lived your life as you saw fit and made the world a better place in the process. Link to Original
  20. by Jason Stotts I can’t believe it’s been another year and now Erosophia is 12! While it wasn’t a big year for content on Erosophia, it has been a really big year for Eros and Ethos, which is coming out THIS FALL! One of the big changes that made this possible was splitting Eros and Ethos into multiple volumes. The original project simply grew much too large and there was a natural split between the first part that establishes the theory and the second part that applies it to the various problems of sexual ethics. Volume 1: The Theory Introduction (Finished) Chapter 1: Ethics (Finished) Chapter 2: Emotions and Sentiments (Final copy edit) Chapter 3: Love (Final copy edit) Chapter 4: Relationships (Final substantive edit) Chapter 5: Sexual Attraction & Fantasy (Ver. 3/4) Chapter 6: Identity, Orientation, & Self-Understanding (Ver. 3/4) Chapter 7: Sex, Union, & Intimacy (Ver. 3/4) Most of Volume 1 is done and in copy-editing now. We’re shooting to have everything ready to be published on October 1st. Soon, we’ll have the website www.ErosandEthos.com fully operational to support the book launch. I’m so excited to have Eros and Ethos almost done and ready for publication. If you want to stay current with things, you can subscribe to Erosophia or for a more personal touch, subscribe to my new quarterly newsletter. Finally, I want to thank all of you, for a great 12 years and I look forward to many more years to come. Link to Original
  21. by Jason Stotts Editing of penultimate draft of “Eros and Ethos” is going well and it is about 1/3 edited now. I anticipate having a complete final draft sometime this summer with publication in the early Fall. To that end, I’m looking for around 3 volunteers to serve as proofreaders. You must be willing to commit to returning each chapter within 2 weeks and you must commit to doing this for all of Volume 1, which is 7 chapters. I’m anticipating about one chapter a month through Summer. If you’re interested, email me at Jason(at)JasonStotts.com and let me know why I should pick you. If you have experience editing, that would certainly be a plus. If you have background in philosophy or sex, that would also be a plus. If you just really enjoy reading, that works too. There is no special background that you have to have, because the book is written for a general audience. The people selected will be thanked in the book and receive a numbered and signed first edition. Link to Original
  22. by Jason Stotts I recently read G. E. M. Anscombe’s “Modern Moral Philosophy” for the first time and I think that it is one of the most astute and important essays on ethics that I have ever read. In it, she has three major theses, but it is the second that is the most important and makes the paper a necessary read for anyone interested in ethics. Her second thesis is this: The concepts of obligation, and duty—moral obligation and moral duty, that is to say—and of what is morally right and wrong, and of the moral sense of “ought,” ought to be jettisoned if this is psychologically possible; because they are survivals, or derivatives from survivals, from an earlier conception of ethics which no longer generally survives, and are only harmful without it. (p. 1) She wants to take on the ideas that we have a duty to do, or that morality obligates us to do, certain things for which we can be condemned as “morally wrong” if we fail in them (it is important to emphasize that these are all unchosen duties or obligations and that someone voluntarily choosing to take on a duty or obligation is an entirely different issue). She has in her sights any ethical system that utilizes the concept of “duty” or “obligation,” which is nearly all major ethical systems: in utilitarianism you have a duty to maximize happiness, in Kantianism you have a duty to your unknowable nature-in-itself, in religion you have a duty to obey your god, etc. This is no easy task, for if she’s right, then she will take out all of these ethical systems at the base and render them unsupported. So, what’s her argument? First, that many people feel that there is some special psychological force involved in moral “shoulds” that make them different from other kinds of shoulds like “you should put gas in your car.” This special “‘moral’ sense” implies “some absolute verdict (like one of guilty/not guilty on a man)” (p. 5). This arises from an equation between “shoulds” and obligations or duties, “in the sense in which one can be obliged or bound by law” (p. 5). Second, that this conjunction between “shoulds” and the law has arisen because Christianity has dominated ethics for centuries and it operates via a “law conception of ethics” (p. 5). In this conception of ethics, their god is the lawgiver and his commandments are the law. Of course, this divine law must be obeyed absolutely and is not open to question or amenable to reason. Third, that failure to do your duty and obey the divine law is not simply to do a single wrong. Rather, it makes a person “sinful” or morally wrong in toto: a person who violates the divine law has become a moral-law breaker or outlaw of the worst kind. This is in marked contrasted with an ethical system like Aristotle’s, which antecedes Christianity, and has no term of absolute condemnation. Rather, Aristotle has terms such as “unjust” or “impious” for discrete acts or terms such as “scoundrel” or “villain” for a person with a bad character, but no way of describing someone who is irredeemably evil. Fourth, any ethical system that utilizes this framework of duty, but without the idea of the divine lawgiver, has severed the concepts of duty and obligation from the only foundation that might give them meaning. Thus, they are without meaning and illegitimate. This is an amazing insight and I would rank it among the top most insightful critiques of ethics in the history of philosophy. Certainly it is the most powerful critique of duty-based ethics that I have ever seen and it firmly cuts them off at the base and renders them absurd. Yet, Anscombe could have made an even stronger case. If she had not been a Catholic (and she was a devout, refused to use birth-control and protested abortion clinics, Catholic), she could have taken the tack that since there is no such thing as a god, the very idea of moral duty to a lawgiver does not make sense. It is, to use her analogy, “as if the notion ‘criminal’ were to remain when criminal law and criminal courts had been abolished and forgotten” (p. 6). Thus, all ideas of moral duty or obligation in this special sense must resolve to absurdity. Now, to be fair to Anscombe, she does even apply her argument to the divine command theorist and notes that even someone using a divine command framework must still justify why we have a duty to obey the divine commands (p. 8). This, of course, students of Philosophy will recognize as a take on the Euthyphro problem. Moreover, she notes that the Kantian move, that one has a duty to oneself-in-itself due to one’s noumenally rational nature will fail to justify the legislative framework, since “whatever you do ‘for yourself’ may be admirable; but it is not legislating” (p. 13), and this does seem to be a completely unwarranted jump. Thus, I think Anscombe has destroyed the idea of unchosen moral duty or obligation. It makes me curious, though, why this essay isn’t more commonly read or cited. Is it because Anscombe is a woman? Is it because people are loathe to give up their duty-ethics? I do not know the answer to this, but I am certain that philosophy is much the worse for this essay not being better known. My own position, before reading Anscombe’s excellent essay, was that all duty ethics ultimately end up being no more than systems of punishments of the form “You have a duty to do X and if you don’t, you will be punished”. For this reason, they should not even be considered ethical systems at all, but merely systems of rules and punishments (I argue this in my forthcoming book Eros and Ethos, Chapter 1). While I maintain this position, Anscombe’s idea really explains the force that some people feel for duty-ethics. An interesting question is why people feel this force in the first place. I submit that it is not because we are used to a legal framework, since few of us have cause to come in contact with the legal system, especially during the years when we are forming our moral beliefs. Rather, it is that many people learned to be moral by having morality imposed on them from the outside as they grew up, by their parents or caregivers. They never took it upon themselves to actually become moral, they simply followed the moral rules they were given in order to conform to a moral code they didn’t understand. Thus, they want to keep having morality be forced upon them, to conform to the only form of morality they know, while simply substituting the moral rules of duty-based systems for the rules of their parents. This is, I believe, the origin of the force that many feel for “moral duty,” although it is only through Anscombe’s argument that we can understand why the very term falls flat. Thus, for all these reasons, we must reject duty-based ethical systems as being both empty of content (laws without a lawgiver) and as facades hiding a brutish system of punishments. One can, hereafter, say “Do X or I will harm you,” although obviously this is no moral claim, but can no longer say “You have a duty to do X.” Such a claim is incoherent and brutish. All references in essay to: Anscombe, G. E. M. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy, Vol. 33 (124), p. 1-19. Link to Original
  23. by Jason Stotts After much agonizing over this decision, I’ve decided that I will be publishing Eros and Ethos, my forthcoming book on sexual ethics, as two separate volumes. Thus, instead of: Eros and Ethos: A New Theory and Application of Sexual Ethics It will be: Eros and Ethos: Volume 1, A New Theory of Sexual Ethics & Eros and Ethos: Volume 2, A New Application of Sexual Ethics There are a number of reasons for publishing Eros and Ethos separately. The primary reason is that each half of Eros and Ethos is as long as most nonfiction books by itself: Volume 1 is around 100,000 words or about 210 book pages and Volume 2 is around 95,000 words or about 200 book pages. So, as you can see, publishing them separately makes sense. Moreover, each can easily stand on its own as a separate book. Most importantly, this means that I can focus my attention on finishing the final drafts of Volume 1 and getting it published right away. Volume 1 should be released within the next 6-8 months and Volume 2 should follow within the next 3-5 years. After both volumes have been published, I will release an omnibus edition, in probably 7-10 years, that will bring together revised editions of the first two volumes and include another 50-100 pages of original content. This is really exciting news for me, because it means that Eros and Ethos: Volume 1 will be published soon! I’m so excited about this. I’m excited for you to see it. I’m excited for it to be in the world. I’m excited about all of the original philosophy that it contains, which has never been done by anyone before. I’m excited to have created something that I think is amazing, new, revolutionary, and a boon for human flourishing. I’m excited to have done something about which I can be proud. To give you an idea of why I’m so excited about, and proud of, this project, let me give you just some of the things it includes: A new theory of ethics. A new theory of emotions, including how to understand the connection between a person’s beliefs and their emotions. A new theory of erotic love and better ways to think about love more generally. A new theory of sexual attraction and a full explanation of it. New ways to understand sexual orientation, sexual identities, as well as masculinity and femininity. And much more! AND, most importantly, all of this culminates in a new way to understand sex and its importance in a human life. I really think that these books have the potential to make the world better and improve people’s lives. I’ll send out another update once I have a better idea of the publication date, but it’s time to get excited about it. Link to Original
  24. by Jason Stotts I can’t believe I’ve been blogging for 11 years already! A lot has happened in the last year, so let me give you an overview of what’s been going on. If you want to stay current with things, you can subscribe to Erosophia or for a more personal touch, subscribe to my new quarterly newsletter. Last year I said I’d be done with Eros and Ethos by December of 2015. Well, that was optimistic. On the other hand, there has been a lot of work done in the last year and it’s a much better book now. It currently stand at just over 188,000 words and approximately 600 book pages. I’ve listed the current chapters below and how complete they are, with respect to the number draft they are currently on and the total number of drafts anticipated. At the rate I’m going with my current editor, I expect to have a completed penultimate draft by January and to complete the final revisions by this time next year. Part 1: The Theory Chapter 1: Ethics (Ver. 3/4) Chapter 2: Emotions and Sentiments (Ver. 3/4) Chapter 3: Love (Ver. 3/4) Chapter 4: Relationships (Ver. 3/4) Chapter 5: Sexual Attraction & Fantasy (Ver. 2/4) Chapter 6: Identity, Orientation, & Self-Understanding (Ver. 2/4) Chapter 7: Sex, Union, & Intimacy (Ver. 2/4) Part 2: Applications Chapter 8: Erotic Decadence (Ver. 2/4) Chapter 9: Faith, Mysticism, & Religion (Ver. 1/3) Chapter 10: Family & Progeny (Ver. 1/3) Chapter 11: Sex for Sale (Ver. 1/3) Chapter 12: Children & Sexuality (Ver. 1/3) Chapter 13: Polysexuality (Ver. 1/3) Chapter 14: Kink (Ver. 1/3) Chapter 15: Public & Private (Ver. 1/3) Chapter 16: Society, Sex, & the Law (Ver. 1/3) Conclusion (Ver. 1/3) Epilogue: Selected Philosophic Essays (Ver. 1/3) Last year I announced that I’m working on my first fictional work called The Wizard’s Tower. I have spent most of the last year working on Eros and Ethos, but I am pleased to announce that The Wizard’s Tower is nearly done in first draft! If you’re interested in more news about The Wizard’s Tower, sign up for the newsletter to be the first to find out what’s going on with it. If you’ve enjoyed Erosophia these last 11 years, please consider sending me some love. You can donate via PayPal: You can buy me a birthday present from my Amazon Wishlist. You can email me and tell me that my work has had some impact in your life: Jason(at)JasonStotts.com (I could really use this one right now). Or, you can like Erosophia’s Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/ErosophiaBlog. Finally, I want to thank all of you, for a great 11 years and I look forward to many more years to come. Link to Original
  25. by Jason Stotts I’m creating a special newsletter for people who are interested in keeping track of what I’m doing and the progress of my various projects, like Eros and Ethos or The Wizard’s Tower. If you’re interested, head to http://jasonstotts.com/newsletter and sign up there. The first edition will be going out soon and will include some exclusive content not found anywhere else. Link to Original
×