Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

rosechild

Regulars
  • Content count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About rosechild

  • Rank
    Newbie

Previous Fields

  • Country
    United States
  • State (US/Canadian)
    Arizona
  • Relationship status
    Single
  • Real Name
    Heather Rose
  • Copyright
    Copyrighted
  1. rosechild

    Charities for children

    Thanks. Those were the lines I was thinking along. Just always nice to have my ideas backed up a bit
  2. So I'm running into an inner conflict regarding charities. My family is looking into doing a charity for Indian children of lepers. You sponsor a child and this gives them the ability to move from the leper colony and into functioning society, an opportunity they would not have otherwise. I'm not usually one to lean toward charities, as I find most of the time I am funding a situation that could have been avoided and therefore condoning irresponsible actions. In this case though, the children were born into a situation that instantly put them in a state of arrested development, with no opportunity to advance within society, having been exiled with their parents. Should I just expect them to do what they can within their limits, to progress as far as their boundaries allow? I find myself viewing it as holding down the potential of a human being, withholding the right to the pursuit of happiness, leaving them in stagnation out of no action of their own, but by the choice of their parents to bring a child into a world they knew was closed off to them. Any opinions on this topic? Would contributing to this charity or similar charities be contradictory to the objectivist view?
×