Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum
Mammon

Cuba gives a little leeway to it's citizens?

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Cuban state workers make an average of $19 a month. On that salary, it would take nearly two years to earn enough for one night at the Saratoga. Similarly, car rentals in Cuba -- also managed by the military -- are among the most expensive in Latin America, with vehicles typically going for as much as $100 a day.

Being allowed is not anywhere near being able...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...8033102779.html

They can buy cellphones and T.V.s now? And stay in there own hotels? Hell must be freezing over!

Thats nothing really. Cuba is still a totalitarian police state. There are no individual liberties and there is no capitalism. I wish the Bay of Pigs had really resulted in destruction of that evil communist "paradise".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cuba announced that -- starting next year -- its citizens will not need exit visas to leave the country. They have not lifted all restrictions, but this is one step forward. Cubans still need a passport and a visa from their destination country. In addition, the government reserves the right to stop anyone leaving for national security reasons and if it would be a brain drain (e.g. to stop doctors from leaving).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Three Cuban soccer players defected ahead of game in Toronto

Even their official teams cannot keep it together. When the exist Visas are lifted it will be like the old Soviet states after the collapse of Communisim. Everyone who has a grandma, distant cousin, or whatever will rush out of there. Anyone, who can, whether legally or illegally will move out, leaving only those who cannot leave or those who are 'privilaged' enough not to want to leave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If a government says, "OK, now we let you do X", that does not in any way indicate a respect for the right to do X.  And it says nothing about whether it will change its mind later.

If a government does not respect rights in principle, nothing it does should be regarded as "respecting" rights, and to read current events as evidencing a growth in that nonexistent respect is to profoundly misunderstand those events and their likely consequences.

(The same critique applies to hurrahs when America's government announces that it will no longer violate this or that right.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×