Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

4th Generation War,objectivism And John Boyd

Rate this topic


Al Kufr

Recommended Posts

I dont know if anybody here likes to study military theory or has ever heard of John Boyd(he is the most important military theorist since Sun Tzu),but his ideas are some of the most powerful ideas ive ever heard. And i believe that if they were applied to this war on terror in the correct manner it would be devastating to our islamist enemy. But the problem is that many if his ideas have been "infected" with contemporary bad philosophy and ideas(pragmatism for example),but what hasnt been infected by that though?

For example it has lead some military theorists to consider mutually agreed chivalric codes with islamist!!! becuase war is fought at three levels, the physical, the mental, and the moral level, which is the most POWERFUL level so the weak are perceived to have the moral high ground, for example in the "The Power Of Weakness" :

"Martin van Creveld who wrote 'The Transformation of War' the definitive book on 4th generation war says:-- --“In private life, an adult who keeps beating down on a five-year old – even such a one as originally attacked him with a knife – will be perceived as committing a crime; therefore, he will lose the support of bystanders and end up being arrested, tried and convicted. In international life, an armed force that keeps beating down on a weaker opponent will be seen as committing a series of crimes; therefore it will end up losing the support of its allies, its own people and its troops. Depending on the quality of the forces … things may happen quickly or take a long time to mature. However, the outcome is always the same. He (or she) who does not understand this does not understand anything about war; or, indeed, human nature.”--

He concludes that its "Human Nature" to feel sorry for the week.

And this is by William Lind who is a conservative(pragmatist) defense policy analyst and who wrote Maneuver Warfare Handbook says:

"In other words, he who fights against the weak – and the rag-tag Iraqi militias are very weak indeed – and loses, loses. He who fights against the weak and wins also loses. To kill an opponent who is much weaker than yourself is unnecessary and therefore cruel; to let that opponent kill you is unnecessary and therefore foolish. As Vietnam and countless other cases prove, no armed force, however rich, however powerful, however advanced, however well motivated is immune to this dilemma. The end result is always disintegration and defeat …. That is why the present adventure will almost certainly end as the previous one (Vietnam) did. Namely, with the last U.S. troops fleeing the country while hanging on to their helicopters’ skids." --Lind continues and asks this questions, "More fundamentally, the question of how a strong state such as the United States can fight the physically weak (but often morally powerful) non-state enemies it now faces is a central problem in Fourth Generation theory. "

"the question of how a strong state such as the United States can fight the physically weak (but often morally powerful) non-state enemies it now faces is a central problem in Fourth Generation theory. 

Unless we can come up with an answer (mutually agreed chivalric codes may be the beginning of an answer, where those are possible), the 21st century may see the weak triumph over the strong."

http://www.sftt.org/cgi-bin/csNews/csNews....tch%202004%2edb

And here is another quote that speaks for itself:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detai...=glance&s=books

Now, i hear many Objectivist like leonard peikoff say that we should attack the islamist but he leaves HOW we attack the islamists to the military as if military intellectuals havent been infected by bad ideas, so are there any Objectivist military theorist out there?

Here as some quotes from John Boyd:

Eastern philosophy has had a great influence on military theories with Sun Tzu and Mussashi, so Im wondering, what contribution can Ayn Rands ideas have on how we fight our wars? Especially in this time that we our in a war for our survival.

If you want to know everything about Boyd and his ideas this is the best place to start:

The ESSENTIAL BOYD

http://www.defense-and-society.org/fcs/cowan_proceedings.htm

http://www.d-n-i.net/second_level/boyd_military.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am glad someone brought this up. I am a military history junkie, and have been wrapping my brain around the idea of an Objectivist/Value based military organization.

My thoughts are still bouncing around in my head, and not fit for publication yet. When they are be sure that I will post them.

As for the Boyd fella, I had never heard of him. I did a quick read of the Essential Boyd link you posted, and I must say it looks like a rewrite of Sun Tzu.

Sun Tzu, is pretty definetive in my opinion. You have to strip away all the mystical crap in it, but at it's core it is perhaps the usefull book of strategy and tactics that I have found.

In fact the first translation into a European language of the "Art of War", was French, and it was pubished, if memory serves shortly before Napolean's rise to power.

If you read Napolean's Maxims, you will notice a lot of similarities.

I hope this topic brings some discussion, as it is a great interest to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sun Tzu, is pretty definetive in my opinion. You have to strip away all the mystical crap in it, but at it's core it is perhaps the usefull book of strategy and tactics that I have found.

I highly disagree, we have come so far from Sun Tzu that even reading his work is completly pointless. Everything Sun Tzu thought about has been evolved so much by the likes of Ulyses S. Grant, Kesselring, Robert E. Lee, Erwin Rommel, Georgi Zhukov, Omar Bradley, Boyd, and Patton just to name a few.

If you want useful information on tactics just read Marine Corps tacticle doctrine;)

https://www.doctrine.usmc.mil/htm/doc5.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I highly disagree, we have come so far from Sun Tzu that even reading his work is completly pointless.  Everything Sun Tzu thought about has been evolved so much by the likes of Ulyses S. Grant, Kesselring, Robert E. Lee, Erwin Rommel, Georgi Zhukov, Omar Bradley, Boyd, and Patton just to name a few.

If you want useful information on tactics just read Marine Corps tacticle doctrine;)

https://www.doctrine.usmc.mil/htm/doc5.htm

NO NO NO, Sun tzu is still very important, the art of war is still important just go jhere to read

http://www.d-n-i.net/richards/sword_4_boyd.pdf

http://www.sonshi.com/richards.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have read it numerous times in the past and have found nothing in it that can not be read more easily in other works, exspecially when one is talking about applying it in a modern context.

He may have been the first one to write on Strategic warfare but he is hardly the best one to write on Strategic warfare. He also almost completly ignores small unit action and tacticle warfare.

I am by no means saying his lessons were not important, but they are not the best to look at if one wants to fight a modern war.

Some good reading(linkts to articles, and articles)...

http://worldaffairsboard.com/showthread.php?t=1627

Your welcome to join the forum of course!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have read it numerous times in the past and have found nothing in it that can not be read more easily in other works, exspecially when one is talking about applying it in a modern context.

He may have been the first one to write on Strategic warfare but he is hardly the best one to write on Strategic warfare. He also almost completly ignores small unit action and tacticle warfare.

I am by no means saying his lessons were not important, but they are not the best to look at if one wants to fight a modern war.

Some good reading(linkts to articles, and articles)...

http://worldaffairsboard.com/showthread.php?t=1627

Your welcome to join the forum of course!

I dont know about that, Col. David Hackworth still recomends that all soldier read that book if they are going to war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, he says:

Sun Tzu, an ancient Chinese general/philosopher, wrote THE ART OF WAR more than 2,500 years ago. I strongly urge you to buy it, read it a dozen times and then carry it in your pack next to the PRIMER. They go together like chopsticks and rice and passages of both should be read daily.

I think he means that Sun Tzu is important becuase of the basic thing that are in the book that even modern commaders today ignore to the detriment of their soldiers.

Here is the best example of Hackworth using ideas from the book

http://dev.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=20065351

He quotes him many times in his weekly column:

http://www.sftt.org/cgi-bin/csNews/csNews.....02638255663663

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=18371

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, he says:

Sun Tzu, an ancient Chinese general/philosopher, wrote THE ART OF WAR more than 2,500 years ago. I strongly urge you to buy it, read it a dozen times and then carry it in your pack next to the PRIMER. They go together like chopsticks and rice and passages of both should be read daily.

I think he means that Sun Tzu is important  becuase of the basic thing that are in the book that even modern commaders today ignore to the detriment of their soldiers.

Here is the best example of Hackworth using ideas from the book

http://dev.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=20065351

He quotes him many times in his weekly column:

http://www.sftt.org/cgi-bin/csNews/csNews.....02638255663663

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=18371

Well then sure go ahead and read it. My point is that almost all people in the Army are dealing with tacticle warfare and not strategic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well then sure go ahead and read it. My point is that almost all people in the Army are dealing with tacticle warfare and not strategic.

Well if your tactics are bad doesnt the grand strategy collapse? And if your grand startegy is bad it kinda makes tactics pointless because innthe long runyoull fail anyways.

And the army is a mess they are bearly starting to change from second generation war to third, the marines is where its at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if your tactics are bad doesnt the grand strategy collapse? And if your grand startegy is bad it kinda makes tactics pointless because innthe long runyoull fail anyways.
You can fight a war with bad tactics and win but it turns into a meat grinder. Just look at the Soviets in World War 2.

And the army is a mess they are bearly starting to change from second generation war to third, the marines is where its at.

I agree. On top of this they are moving to a lighter force. Let's see a Stryker Brigade carry out Operation Thunder run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started reading about Boyd only a couple weeks ago, but Patton has been a military idle for me for years now. I was reminded of him by a recent CapMag article, and the description it gave of Patton's tactics reminded me a lot of what I had just read about Boyd.

It turns out that Patton was part of a long line of people, including Sun Tzu, Hannibal, Genghis Khan, Napolean, W. T. Sherman, Stonewall Jackson, and MacArthor, who valued speed and powerful attacks on their enemy's weakest point when it was least expected.

Of course, there is more to maneuver warfare (3rd generation warfare) than that, but I haven't read any complete book on the subject yet. Does anybody have any books to recommend (besides Sun Tzu -- I share Praxus' sentiment about that)? All I know of right now is "Maneuver Warfare Handbook" by William S. Lind and "The Mind of War: John Boyd and American Security" by Grant T. Hammond.

Al Kufr: In response to your first post, were you trying to say that the authors you quoted were altruists?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started reading about Boyd only a couple weeks ago, but Patton has been a military idle for me for years now. I was reminded of him by a recent CapMag article, and the description it gave of Patton's tactics reminded me a lot of what I had just read about Boyd.

It turns out that Patton was part of a long line of people, including Sun Tzu, Hannibal, Genghis Khan, Napolean, W. T. Sherman, Stonewall Jackson, and MacArthor, who valued speed and powerful attacks on their enemy's weakest point when it was least expected.

Of course, there is more to maneuver warfare (3rd generation warfare) than that, but I haven't read any complete book on the subject yet. Does anybody have any books to recommend (besides Sun Tzu -- I share Praxus' sentiment about that)? All I know of right now is "Maneuver Warfare Handbook" by William S. Lind and "The Mind of War: John Boyd and American Security" by Grant T. Hammond.

Al Kufr: In response to your first post, were you trying to say that the authors you quoted were altruists?

Mostly pragmatists, William Lind for example is a conservative, read these articles to give you an example:

"The Marines threw away the opportunity to de-escalate the fighting with the Sunnis in Fallujah and instead have raised the intensity of anti-Americanism there. For months, the Marines trained for de-escalation. But because of one minor incident of barely tactical importance, the killing of four American contractors, the de-escalation strategy was thrown out the window and replaced by an all-out assault on an Iraqi city. The Marines may have been given no choice by the White House, but it also looks as if their own training did not go very deep; the Plain Dealer quoted a Marine battalion commander in Fallujah as saying, “What is coming is the destruction of anti-coalition forces in Fallujah. They have two choices: Submit or die.” That is hardly the language of de-escalation."

http://www.defense-and-society.org/fcs/lind_4_14_04.htm

http://www.defense-and-society.org/fcs/lind_4_21_04.htm

http://www.defense-and-society.org/fcs/lind_4_27_04.htm

If you want more info on 3GW and 4GW the best place to go is:

http://www.d-n-i.net/

http://www.belisarius.com/default.htm

BOOKS:

http://www.defense-and-society.org/top_level/books.htm

http://www.defense-and-society.org/richard...ed_readings.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patton was a brillaint strategist and tought the Germans a thing or two about manouver war. He wasn't a good tactician that's for sure. Omar Bradley and Kissereling are the greatest tacticians of the war in my opinion.

As for books...

The Rommel Papers

A Soldiers Story

War as I Knew It

George Washington

Henry Lee

Ulysses S. Grant Memoirs

Memoirs W.T Sherma

Crusade in Europe

These are all memoirs written by the Generals themselves. You can find more memoirs from nearly every great general in the history of warfare.

*I don't have Word installed on this computer so don't complain about spelling;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mostly pragmatists, William Lind for example is a conservative, read these articles to give you an example:

Would you still recommend his book as a good intro to maneuver warfare despite his foreign policy? I think it should be okay as long as the problems in the white house and the problems on the battlefield are totally separate. Here at home our political leaders are reluctant to fully and decisively protect America's self-interest, and abroad our commanders (and the pentagon?) are still in the traditional 2GW worldview.

As for books...

I'll be sure to look into those, especially Patton's. However, it seems that due to his untimely death the book isn't as much a memoir as it is a compilation of journal entries. One reviewer said it well: "the post-war world lost its opportunity for the war's greatest memoir and its most unpredictable political leader."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be sure to look into those, especially Patton's. However, it seems that due to his untimely death the book isn't as much a memoir as it is a compilation of journal entries. One reviewer said it well: "the post-war world lost its opportunity for the war's greatest memoir and its most unpredictable political leader."

Well, ive read some of his book and its great, and i think you should buy i dont think it give any forein policy stuff though its just on 3GW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would add to this list

The Art of War by Jomini. Hard to find, but worth a read. Supposedly my beloved Stonewall was heavily influenced by his writings.

History of War by Keegan. A good read on the evolution of warfare, strategy and tactics.

Steal My Soldiers Hearts, by Hackworth. A great primer on how to out guerilla the guerillas.

Achtung Panzer, by Guderian. One of the first books to work out the principals of what would be called Blitzkrieg tactics.

When Infantry Attacks, by Rommel. This is a book of lessons learned from WWI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am surprised no one here has mentioned Clausewitz.  Patton, Rommel, and a slew of other military theorists are students of On War.

Yes, Clausewitz had very good ideas, especially on "friction", but John Boyd had A LOT of criticisms of Clausewitz ideas.

Here is a VERY short explanation:

http://www.belisarius.com/modern_business_...lausewitz_2.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm genuinely surprised that nobody mentioned S. L. Marshall's "The Soldier's Load and Mobility of a Nation" that the Marine Corps Press put out many many years ago. For me it was seminal book. He addressed the disconect between doctrine and tactics and wrapped it up in a pretty neat package.

His most important contribution is to combat (pun not intended) the philosophy of burdening your troops down with un-needed equipment on all levels. I always associated him with the Just In Time management concepts meet the military.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...