Zach Beale Posted July 31, 2009 Report Share Posted July 31, 2009 The Gov't released a list of who is to be administered the new vaccine for the treatment of Swine flu. Here's an article from washingtonpost.com about the prority list: Swine Flu. According to the article, it looks like those of us that are least healthy will be treated first, is this entirely practical? I can't seem to find the entire list, but it seems as if those with chronic or terminal illnesses will be treated before those that are healthy, even though those that are terminal will have a shorter lifespan than those that are healthy. I'd like to hear what you have to say about this, and whether or not it's entirely a good idea. Also, if anyone can find that list, I'd appreciate it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vendetta Posted August 1, 2009 Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 The vaccine will be used for depopulation. Most vaccines have mercury and other chemicals which harm people. The Medical Industrial Complex only cares about keeping people sick so that they can continue to rake in more profits. (Not that profit is necessarily bad) There is no profit in keeping the masses healthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zip Posted August 1, 2009 Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 The vaccine will be used for depopulation. Most vaccines have mercury and other chemicals which harm people. The Medical Industrial Complex only cares about keeping people sick so that they can continue to rake in more profits. (Not that profit is necessarily bad) There is no profit in keeping the masses healthy. Wow, did you stumble in here directly from AboveTopSecret.com or did you stop off at www.911truth.org first? As to the OP there should be no list there should only be private companies selling the vaccine to people who want to purchase it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zach Beale Posted August 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 "vendetta" seems to be a troll. I would assume that's the best way to do it, Zip. First come, first serve. Why is it that we see the need to do it this way, however? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zip Posted August 1, 2009 Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 "vendetta" seems to be a troll. I would assume that's the best way to do it, Zip. First come, first serve. Why is it that we see the need to do it this way, however? Because our governments are driven by a code of morality that tells them that being able to pay for something means you are the least deserving of it. The Beggar deserves his free meal because he can not pay for it, so the fact that you can earn the money to pay for yours means that some of those earnings must go to supply the beggars free lunch. People are immoral. That is the basic premise behind every single do good scheme anyone has ever dreamed up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve D'Ippolito Posted August 1, 2009 Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 The rationale for treating the least healthy first, is that they are the ones most likely to be killed by the flu (rather than "merely" laid low for a few days). Not a bad rationale (put the vaccine where it is likely to save lives) considering what could be adopted (and probably will be once the pull peddlers get into the act), but of course there should not be an imposed rationale at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.