Amit Ghate at PJM: Values and the Defense of Freedom

[Paul Hsieh]

On October 9, PajamasMedia published Amit Ghate's OpEd, "Values and the Defense of Freedom".

In it, he responds to the question, "Is faith necessary for defending natural rights, or is reason sufficient?" Here is the opening:

In the wake of the recent Values Voter Summit, a worrisome question arises: will the Tea Parties or a reformed GOP be able to champion limited government and fiscal responsibility, without also importing the religious right’s so-called "social values"?

HotAir's Allahpundit raises this issue, noting that speakers at the summit repeatedly asserted the idea that limited government must ultimately be based on religious beliefs -- on the existence of a "Big God." Uncomfortable with these assertions and searching for a better, secular defense of freedom, Allahpundit asks how Objectivists (adherents of Ayn Rand's philosophy) would respond.

It's a perceptive question. Though many recognize Rand as a stalwart defender of freedom, few appreciate how radically her defense differs from that of traditional religionists. Key to her innovative approach is an original conception of values and morality -- one which ultimately puts her at odds with much of the religious program...

(Read the full text of "Values and the Defense of Freedom".)

Congratulations, Amit!

View the full article

[anonrobt]

On October 9, PajamasMedia published Amit Ghate's OpEd, "<a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/values-and-the-defense-of-freedom/?singlepage=true">Values and the Defense of Freedom</a>".

In it, he responds to the question, "Is faith necessary for defending natural rights, or is reason sufficient?" Here is the opening:<blockquote>In the wake of the recent Values Voter Summit, a worrisome question arises: will the Tea Parties or a reformed GOP be able to champion limited government and fiscal responsibility, without also importing the religious right’s so-called "social values"?

HotAir's Allahpundit raises this issue, noting that speakers at the summit repeatedly asserted the idea that limited government must ultimately be based on religious beliefs -- on the existence of a "Big God." Uncomfortable with these assertions and searching for a better, secular defense of freedom, Allahpundit asks how Objectivists (adherents of Ayn Rand's philosophy) would respond.

It's a perceptive question. Though many recognize Rand as a stalwart defender of freedom, few appreciate how radically her defense differs from that of traditional religionists. Key to her innovative approach is an original conception of values and morality -- one which ultimately puts her at odds with much of the religious program...</blockquote>(Read the full text of "<a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/values-and-the-defense-of-freedom/?singlepage=true">Values and the Defense of Freedom</a>".)

Congratulations, Amit!<div><img width="1" height="1" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3372618-7400381639687491831?l=blog.dianahsieh.com" alt=""></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/noodlefood/~4/gBwI4d0AEzQ" height="1" width="1">

View the full article

The comments to Amit's OpEd were, however, quite disappointing... about as irrational and concrete-bound as any seen...