Avila Posted August 2, 2011 Report Share Posted August 2, 2011 Why are utterly Nationalist, anti immigration, states such as Taiwan, S Korea and Japan not vilified by western media and culture. Why is it generally tolerated that Taiwanese and even less Japanese don't accept foreign immigration but we make a big scandal if a European politician even implies going back to those policies Because they aren't white and they aren't historically a part of Western Civilization. Western Civilization is the real target of multiculturalists. In this country, European discoverers are routinely demonized, and the virtues of this country are ignored while its sins -- slavery, Indian suprression -- are trumpeted. Europe doesn't believe in anything anymore, and so is particularly vulnerable to mass immigration of people whose philosophy is inherently foreign to it. Breivik was initially described as a "Christian fundamentalist", but there's no evidence of that -- he did not belong to any church. Rather he saw Christianity as a potentially unifying force. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEgoist Posted August 2, 2011 Report Share Posted August 2, 2011 Far as I know, the Muslim neighborhoods are perfectly voluntary. The Muslims are simply cruel to those who might mock their social norms, but they don't have the authority to say "You must leave.". Again, that's as far as I know. As long as it is voluntary, I do not care. Also, the Muslim/Sharia "laws" people keep yapping about are cased in Private Arbitration court. All parties involved must consent to such private arbitration. Again, nothing involuntary or coercive here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeatherFall Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 Also, the Muslim/Sharia "laws" people keep yapping about are cased in Private Arbitration court. All parties involved must consent to such private arbitration. Again, nothing involuntary or coercive here. In such a community I would expect to find that people with little social power (women, mainly) are coerced into consenting to such arbitration. I've got no evidence, just the understanding that familial pressure backed up with a backhand is sufficient to make many people ignore more powerful laws that would otherwise protect them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.