Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Reason Man

A Typical Democrat President Lyndon Johnson – A Study

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

The attached file is a brief study (my original writing) of a typical Dem-President after the New Deal. See Link -- http://share.cx.com/fkGKJ (you do not require CX account, password etc, just click the link and click Download). It describes the politicians promoted by democracy who have displaced the Founding Fathers (FFs) – FFs have no chance against them because of the doles dependent vote block of parasites and the divisions amongst individualists. The description / derivation leads to what I have called as “the ultimate compelling argument” against the welfare state, which I claim will even prohibit preaching charity via government despite freedom of thought and expression! After full derivation a sentence at the end says that the Dems want to be Brahmin Bhudevs (gods on earth), but for which they have to destroy all capability in America first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Johnson was bad news. While FDR was a disaster, Truman and Eisenhower were middle-of-road sensible, and Kennedy -- in actual achievement -- mostly so. Johnson changed that significantly and Nixon compounded it. So, Johnson was a modern-day (post FDR) turning point of sorts. Though you mention that both parties are bad, you seem to focus on the Dems. Also, in the final analysis it is the American voter that gets the government he deserves. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

S/WNerd, thanks to you and several others for taking time to read the file, though yours was the only reply.

This post / file was a follow-up to a previous post I made on other boards. You can see it and the replies to it      

 

Title: CAN CHRISTIANITY, JOHN LOCKE, VON MISES, AYN RAND OR ANY COMBINATION SAVE AMERICA?

 

http://www.solopassion.com/node/9748             

 

Another reason why I referred to it is because my next post will be built on several replies to my statement in the discussion that modifying Christianity should save America beyond this point. My next post will be explaining that statement. Please read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...