jacassidy2 Posted December 4, 2015 Report Share Posted December 4, 2015 Hey Folks, You know I am a Rand Scholar with emphasis in Aristotelian metaphysics and Rand/Peikoff's epistemology . Many have emailed me to read Richard Dawkins and I have now done it. Thank you. Hey, it took me about 6 months. My personal advanced education was grad school at the time 1978-1986. I read so much and took notes in categorized volumnes. . I knew the accepted methods were flawed. Some scientist who has internalized the philosophy of Aristoltle/Rand/Peikoff, who can integrate Neo-Darwinism. Can some intellect combine the science knowledge of evolution with the cognative philosophy of Rand/Peikoff? Here is the cognative answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrictlyLogical Posted December 4, 2015 Report Share Posted December 4, 2015 1 hour ago, jacassidy2 said: Hey Folks, You know I am a Rand Scholar with emphasis in Aristotelian metaphysics and Rand/Peikoff's epistemology . Many have emailed me to read Richard Dawkins and I have now done it. Thank you. Hey, it took me about 6 months. My personal advanced education was grad school at the time 1978-1986. I read so much and took notes in categorized volumnes. . I knew the accepted methods were flawed. Some scientist who has internalized the philosophy of Aristoltle/Rand/Peikoff, who can integrate Neo-Darwinism. Can some intellect combine the science knowledge of evolution with the cognative philosophy of Rand/Peikoff? Here is the cognative answer. Did you mean to say more? Wondering what you mean is the "answer"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMeganSnow Posted December 5, 2015 Report Share Posted December 5, 2015 Actually, Harry Binswanger already wrote quite a lengthy treaties on this called The Biological Basis of Telelogical Concepts (which I should really get around to reading sometime). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tadmjones Posted December 6, 2015 Report Share Posted December 6, 2015 (edited) I read it a long time ago , probably have to revisit it. Darwinism, neodarwirism and all things scientific re evolution would better be integrated with cognative science , no? Philosophy can lead you to better science and more so probably with a better philosophy, but we need to be very careful minding the p's and q's , yes ?,for keeping them in their appropriate boxes. Edited December 6, 2015 by tadmjones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.