Objectivism Online Forum

# The realms of the Observed VS Unobserved

Rate this topic

## Recommended Posts

This post predicts what happens when Spacetime gets involved with unobserved quantum waves from the act of observation.

The act of Observation/Measurement is a request of quantum wave information to Spacetime.
The interaction is someone purposely placing a detector wanting a particle to be physical.

You make a request by setting something that can analyze the particle during its life/path. The state of a particle is decided before it starts.

Double slit interpretation:
Randomly shot particles are shot through a double slit, if no one places a detector in the path of the particle, the unobserved particle will be in the form of two waves (one for each slit) . Depending on the which wave ends up with more energy (after the split) ..the final position of a channel representing a fringe will be the final resting place of the now collapsed particle. If the energy wasn't unbalanced, I would expect to see only a single channel of fringe be filled in.

Now a detector gets placed anywhere along the path between the cannon and the final landing screen. The particle shot will be collapsed upon leaving the cannon because the state of the particle has already been decided. It won't be waves, just a particle. It's been pulled from the unobserved quantum realm and made physical in Spacetime. It will go through one slit and hit the final screen in a normal clump.

If you accept this interpretation ..then you accept a particle being either a particle or waves ..not both at the same time.
You now also know that placing a detector in an experiment is a request from a human to the realm of unobserved QM to swap quantum waves into something physical.
Observation is then a property of Spacetime. Observation is the reason Spacetime exits.

General Relativity = Spacetime = the theory of the large scale
Unobserved QM = Waves = the theory of the small scale
They are both realms in the same domain
Observed (Spacetime) vs Unobserved (Quantum Waves)

Observation is then a request to bring an object from one realm to the other.
Observation is the bridge between the two.
The theory of the very large and small are unified.

This is conditional statement that formulates a Theory of Everything:
If (spacetime object){
//larger than abbes diffraction limit (or the equivalent mass energy levels - quanta) OR being observed
current situation = General Relativity;
}
else{current situation = Unobserved QM;
}
//The particle collapses no matter the state when it hits a predefined Spacetime object.

There is a duality of realms, but the object in question is either in one or the other. Duality is impossible for particles if it can tunnel or fit through a space smaller than its structure. Waves can do that sort of thing ..not physical (observed) objects.

The delayed choice quantum eraser shows us that the entire life of the particle is known. It's about the entire life of both entangled particles. The first particle knows if the partner will ever be observed.

This is where I go a bit off the deep end (you are welcome to ignore this paragraph):
The reason for Spacetime to exist is for living things to be able to observe. Living things wouldn't like being in an unobservable world.There isn't a logical reason for Spacetime to exist. Spacetime was written to use unobserved wave information for mortals. I've had time to consider what my post implies and it points at a god being involved. Not a god man has described, but one bored out of its existence. The meaning of life is to entertain a god with nothing but time to waste. Each observation we make is something to entertain this god. The realm of unobserved quantum waves has always been and always will be. Spacetime has a beginning. Unobserved quantum waves don't need anything from Spacetime to function. Gravitons don't exist. Photons don't use our version of time. The distance a photon travels doesn't matter. If we request it, its state has been decided.

I want to add that I think there is a good chance a black hole is a spherical gap in Spacetime with the unobservable quantum realm exposed. The event horizon is still spacetime, but inside that is quantum waves.

The cause of a polarized eraser with the double slit is the same for quantum uncertainty.

You have a double slit with opposite linear polarizers at each slit. You get an observed clump. You then add a 45 degree polarizer and the fringes come back.
It's not because the which way information is getting erased. It's because the particle starts a new life when passing through multiple filters.
The state of a particle is predetermined based on the path it will fly through. But something interesting happens with you place multiple detectors.
The particles state is reassessed while passing through a polarizer. If it sees another polarizer in its path it's going to cycle back to being a wave.

Atoms normally shake around with thermal energy ..but not as much as quantum uncertainty makes them appear to be doing.

The Uncertainty Principle is a side effect from repeated requests to make the QM object real/physical.
It's a delay/smear from the system not being able to process quick enough. Swapping from wave to particle is apparently taxing, especially if it has to do it to each observed event (frame/timeline), for momentum tests.

A simple double slit example shows us that a particle can be requested to decohere and remain decohered until it hits the final screen.
An Uncertainty Principle test requires several requests of decoherence to get the momentum.
What's newly discovered is that each request is causing the particle to cycle from wave to particle, setting fuzziness because it wasn't fast enough to do the swap.

If you are measuring something that isn't remaining in the same state, you can't blame the detectors of decoherence anymore. It was ridiculous to assume a detector capable of displaying both coherence and decoherence was the cause anyways.

##### Share on other sites

How does the Schroedinger equation fit into what you're saying?

##### Share on other sites

It fits just fine if probabilities are still good enough for you.

##### Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Time doesn't pass in a black hole (past the event horizon) because unobserved quantum waves don't use time. If unobserved quantum waves don't use time, is it a safe bet they are using frequency instead? The quantum field is usually intermixed with spacetime, but apparently it doesn't always have to be.

Does anyone here have an account on newscientist.com?

I've got to know if my ideas were just stolen.

Edited by pittsburghjoe

##### Share on other sites

What, exactly, does frequency mean if time doesn't pass?

##### Share on other sites

Time doesn't have to be used for it to pass.

##### Share on other sites

The first three words of Pittsburghjoe's most recent post are

21 hours ago, pittsburghjoe said:

Time doesn't pass

.

So my question stands.

##### Share on other sites

field excitation formalism of QFT

##### Share on other sites

Can you elaborate?

##### Share on other sites

The quantum field is only for unobserved quantum waves. Excitations don't require a timeline. They don't use spacetime.

##### Share on other sites

What do unobserved quantum waves wave through?

What does frequency mean in this context, and why is it called frequency?

How does a detector change a non-physical entity not using spacetime to a physical entity using spacetime?

##### Share on other sites

It's the quantum field vs spacetime.

We don't know much about the unobserved. It just isn't using spacetime.

A detector is deciding the state of the particle before it even starts. Spacetime deals with physical objects. The quantum field does waves.

##### Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pittsburghjoe said:

Spacetime deals with physical objects. The quantum field does waves.

Is god a physical object or a wave?

##### Share on other sites

God is able to exist in both

##### Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, pittsburghjoe said:

God is able to exist in both

At the same time? Or at different times?

##### Share on other sites

It created spacetime, it can do whatever the f it wants.

##### Share on other sites
On 8/24/2019 at 11:24 AM, pittsburghjoe said:

It created spacetime, it can do whatever the f it wants.

Why was god bored before he created time? If time isn't passing, then there can't be any period of unentertaining time. Doesn't boredom require the passage of time?

##### Share on other sites

Living things require spacetime. God doesn't need it but his entertainment does.

##### Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, pittsburghjoe said:

Living things require spacetime. God doesn't need it but his entertainment does.

I thought god could do whatever he wants. Surely he could make living things that don't require spacetime.

##### Share on other sites

We don't have another reason for spacetime to exist.

##### Share on other sites
2 hours ago, pittsburghjoe said:

We don't have another reason for spacetime to exist.

I'm sure that's no problem. God doesn't need a reason to do something.

##### Share on other sites

oh, so you don't want it to be a problem so it isn't one?

##### Share on other sites

You fool! Our very limited and frail minds will never comprehend the reasons god has for anything. God transcends boredom.

##### Share on other sites

The purpose of spacetime is life. At the very least, god wanted life to be a thing.

##### Share on other sites
4 hours ago, pittsburghjoe said:

oh, so you don't want it to be a problem so it isn't one?

I'm just saying that creating life and spacetime might be involuntary functions of a god, like creating pee and poop are for humans. Peeing and pooping can be entertaining, but I wouldn't say I do them to alleviate boredom--or to fulfill any chosen purpose really.

## Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

• ### Topics

• 355
• 3
• 34
• 12
• 71
• 3
• 0
• 2
• 0
• 61
×
• Create New...