Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Where can an Objectivist find some Action?

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

I've read nearly everything by Rand, and all I could gather as to advice on activism is to look for Ad-Hoc committies, and I am not really sure how to decipher between legit and not-so-legit causes. I search for them all the time, and I found one that was interesting called "FIRE" advocating reason in education, but I don't know how to dig deep enough to discover whether the leaders/founders of such groups are really and truely the kind of objectivists I agree with, or just posing under the title of objectivist when they are really Rationalists, Libertarians, or even Solipsists. I am a college student dying to enact all this youthful idealism and finding no appropriate means to do so. Does anyone have any information on this?

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be extremely careful about joining ad-hoc groups without knowing exactly what they stand for (which you seemed to indicate you are). Besides joining ad-hoc groups, you can:

1. recommend Objectivist literature to friends and peers

2. discuss (not debate, haha) Objectivism with friends and peers that are willing to

3. do a lot of reading, writing and thinking on your own. Re-read some, if not all, of Rand's work for further clarification and integration; write short opinion pieces, full articles, and full-blown essays on various topics; and constantly evaluate all that is happening around you.

4. Speak on every avenue open to you. Take those writing pieces and try to get them published in as many ways possible (school newspaper, your own newspaper, a local newspaper, or even a national newspaper). Continue your efforts to create either a formal or informal Objectivism club.

5. Pursue a career which will contribute to spreading Objectivism and changing the world. I strive to become a professor of philosophy and a writer, perhaps even working for ARI or any other such organization affiliated with ARI working to spread Objectivism. If you have any such career goal, work towards achieving it.

6. Perhaps support an ad-hoc group that you know to be in-line with your principles and/or support ARI.

These 6 things seem to be the only things that you can do to quelch your "youthful idealism." I too feel quite frustrated sometimes about not being able to do more, about the fact that the world has so many problems, etc. But you must recognize that you can't hope to change the world overnight. Put a lot of effort into those 6 things and at least some of that "youthful idealism" and perhaps frustration will be fed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and you can create a website and/or a blog.

(Blatant self-promotion:) If you want a blog/website at incredibly low rates, check out my hosting company: Collectrix.com If you don't have a domain name already, you can get yourname.objectivismonline.net or yourname.rationalmind.net for no extra charge.

Edit: I'm no longer involved with Collectrix.com. However, since I still own the domains, I'll offer the same deal as before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think you have it bad, imagine how difficult it is in eastern-Europe (more pricise, Romania).

We don't even have a "right" on our political spectrum: only a center and a left :-(

Perhaps, if you really want to get involved into something different, perhaps you could work on spreading true ideas in other countries, besides the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
If you think you have it bad, imagine how difficult it is in eastern-Europe (more pricise, Romania).

We don't even have a "right" on our political spectrum: only a center and a left :-(

I've heard from a number of people about how rare capitalists are in Europe. I think organizing a Walk for Capitalism ( http://www.celebratecapitalism.org/ ) is a good way to promote your ideas even if you don't know any Objectivists where you live. A friend in Belguim organized one and was amazed and how much support he got for a pro-capitalist demonstration in a socialist country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
(Blatant self-promotion:) If you want a blog/website at incredibly low rates, check out my hosting company: Collectrix.com  If you don't have a domain name already, you can get yourname.objectivismonline.net or yourname.rationalmind.net for no extra charge.

Sorry Capitalist, but I couldn't resist pointing out an interesting selling point on your company's website:

Dedicated servers -- Our state-of-the-art, Y2K ready servers are designed for about 50% uptime and are connected to a spool of fiber optics we found at a Silicon Valley-based parking lot. In addition to our super fast computers, the only technicians that are allowed to toy with the servers are ones given a Level 3 security clearance from the School of Hard Knocks. So you can sleep soundly knowing that your information is safe and secure.

Pretty impressive uptime claim. Sure you can back it up?

Ryan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I've been giving this queston a lot of thought over the years. At some point I'm going to put together a Website detailing how I think it needs to be done; but here are some of the points I think need to be borne in mind.

TACTICS

Forget about convincing people by means of trench warfare; that is, you won't do it by straight argument. See the "anti-realism" issue you've been grappling with to see what I mean; people will take whatever smidgeon of Objectivism you communicate in the short time you have, put it into their terms of thought, and blame you for the resulting contradictions. Overhauling someone's terms of thought is a huge process with a *willing* participant, let alone a hostile one. If you are lucky, you may be able to "manufacture" one Objectivist this way in your entire lifetime. Not a great rate of return. About all you'll get out of this is practice.

Instead, fight using high-volume and guerilla tactics: "high-altitude bombing", pinpoint sniper attacks, and limited engagements/skirmishing.

High altitude bombing of the Internet kind is when you lurk on a forum having a better-than-average likelihood of being anti-Left, and drop well-argued posts using Objectivist ideas aiming at the topic, and then disengage. The purpose is to "seed" ideas, to induce curiosity from others to inquire further. Find fora which seem to lend themselves to the sort of topics and discussions you want to work with, and go for it. The test bed for me was a firearms board, which has its share of nuts but is by nature of its topic well-filtered for leftish sheeple. I suggest picking fora by your own interests, as being a genuine member of the board can boost your impact.

Other types of HAB include letters-to-the-editor and other forms of writing and speech. The general principle is that you drop a "package" and keep flying on to the next target. The advantage of this method, is fresh targets and/or fresh issues on every drop.

Some key HAB tactics:

i) Try wherever possible to learn how to express the same ideas in fresh terms and different words every time. I cringe at people who use the same terms every time, and doubly so when they repeat the same verbal constructs Ayn Rand used. This is because someone who has integrated the ideas rather than merely parroting the dogma will learn to express them in various contexts, terms and analogies, because the philosophy is now present in all the different areas of their lives. They apply the principle in new situations all the time and consequently learn new, fresh and unique ways to communicate it. Someone who has merely latched onto the philosophy as a dogma or mantra -- and they do exist, sadly -- will show it in their tendency to repetition. People notice that.

ii) STAY OUT OF THE TRENCHES. Come back around to see how your post played, perhaps follow up if you see opportunity... but don't get drawn in. Try to keep your replies compact and to the point. If you think that the only way to handle a rebuttal is with a long explanatory post, it's time to move on. Don't get sucked in. Reply to the genuine questions, and skip the rest. The "enemy" will smear you as dodging them etc. but there's no reason to care.

Sniping means to fire small, pinpoint shots at the target. The purpose in the case of people with potential is to cause them to consider a new question or idea in the context of a familiar issue. That is where the main potential for sniping ROI is.

Sniping the enemy, however, is different; it only serves to keep them uncomfortable. On leftist boards, that will just get you banned, but on non-political boards, you can actually do some good this way, by emboldening dissent.

A friend of mine told me about this Leftist with a big, loud mouth, who had more or less established a hegemony-by-intimidation over an Internet cinema mailing list. He was constantly construing everything in Leftist terms, slamming dissenting ideas at every chance, but at a sneaky level which didn't quite get him banned. If a dissenter engaged him, he would simply slime them right back, at which point a general hue and cry would come from the other members decrying political discussions as such *without naming a side*... which left the dissenter cut off and the Leftist, having scored his points, smirking.

One day my friend forwared to me one of his more asinine posts, which happened to have the perfect hole in it. I fired a short two-line post back to my friend and he forwarded it. KABOOM!!!! The Leftist went positively ballistic, smearing my friend and me with piles of invective. The merest hint of principled and well-armed opposition just sent him right off. Three days later he apologized to the list, including my friend, for his huge rant. But the damage was done; the atmosphere in the list became less oppressive for a time as his heretofore silent opponents saw the opportunity to speak up. A very good shot, that was; I could tell I had wrecked his world for at least a week.

Limited engagement and skirmishing is when you do engage someone in an argument, but you keep it constrained to a certain range. As all issues are interconnected, the tendency is there for the issue to "balloon" on you, losing your focus and your audience. Don't do that; keep it "bite-sized". This doesn't mean dropping the full context; it simply means that you endeavor to deliver your viewpoint in parcels they can process. Don't overload them. This is best done with someone who you've already determined to be worth the effort. The idea is to determine how much they can handle and on what topics, and to "feed" them accordingly. Try to do this on a demand-driven basis; let them come to you.

On the question of actual protests and such things as Walk for Capitalism, I'd classify those as being advisable only for those who are quick on their mental feet (and their real feet!). Verbal argument requires fast-moving minds to be effective. Joining other protests on an ad-hoc, issue-by-issue basis can be fruitful, but by its nature will be almost entirely trench warfare. Keeping altitude and distance is tough in person.

STRATEGY

Our objective should be to buy the high-level intellectuals time to engineer the propagation of Objectivist ideas into the intellectual realm.

As Ayn Rand makes clear, the real battle is at the epistemological level, and that's going to be fought in the rarified atmosphere of intellectual circles. Because of the extremely low rate of return on "trench warfare", reaching students and young people while waiting for the older Kantians to die off and not be replaced is the only way to "manufacture" Objectivists wholesale. At best, that would take one generation if we ruled the universities right now. So, it's going to take a while.

It's also not a process that will happen in a Gulag.

So, rather than try to win the war by other means, we need to run interference, to buy as much time as possible for the long-range efforts to start paying off -- and above all we must somehow preserve the United States in its semi-free form. Those are what I see as my proper strategic goals.

If you can influence someone in such a manner that they alter their viewpoint on an issue in a more rational direction, that is a victory. If you can force a leftist to backtrack and defend themselves on an issue that they've taken for granted as "won", it's a victory. If someone votes against a bad gun-control law instead of for it, because of a discussion he had with you about the right of self-defense, it's a victory.

It isn't a complete one, it may not last, it may only be on one issue, and at best it may just slow the Left down. But if we haven't yet reached their totalitarian end-of-road by the time Objectivism becomes a force in the culture, we WILL win.

For, as Andrew Bernstein put it: "This time the good guys are armed. To the teeth."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...