Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Perception Is the Opposite of Reality

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

I have come across an interesting blog. From my point of you I can say that it happens sometimes. I can bury myself so deeply in thoughts that I can almost feel what I have been thinking of. But to make such a bold statement that it's opposite of reality? I would rather say it's a widening of reality. What do you think?

 

 

by Jennifer Gibson

Do you ever feel like you are actually doing, seeing, or experiencing the things in your daydreams? Perhaps the warm sand beneath your toes while you relax on the beach; the wind rushing through your hair while you drive a fancy sports car; the smooth finish of that fine wine you have been wanting to try. Even if you have never experienced these things before, your brain is recalling sensory information stored in your brain and processing it as abstract thoughts. But how does it do this?

Neuroscientists have long studied how information travels through the brain, but the complex and intricate web has spurred more questions than answers. Are there independent pathways or are there integrated conduits? What direction does information travel, and does it make a difference? While these answers are far from being decided, new evidence suggests that, when you are experiencing or perceiving something, information courses through your brain in the opposite direction as when you are imagining something.

To study brain activity during both visual input and imagination, researchers performed electroencephalography (EEG) on subjects when they were using their imagination and when they were receiving visual input. Some subjects watched short video clips before being asked to recall an image in their heads; other subjects were asked to imagine riding on a magical, flying bicycle before watching video clips. By analyzing the output of the EEG data, the study authors were able to determine the directional flow of information in the brain.

In short, during imagination, information flowed from the parietal lobe to the occipital lobe – from a high-order region that combines multiple sensory inputs to a lower-order region. During visual input, information flowed from the occipital lobe (the area that processes visual stimuli) to the parietal lobe. One hypothesis is that when the brain experiences something, the sensory stimuli get organized and stored; however, when the brain imagines something, it sorts through these stored bits of information and reorganizes them until they actually feel real.

Even if you have not experienced the exact thing that you are imagining, your brain has similar, previous experiences that are stored and ready to be recalled and formed into a new, almost-real experience.

This new information will be useful for engineers, scientists, and medical professionals because it will help build tools to evaluate just how the brain works. Understanding the anatomical and functional features of the brain will eventually assist victims of brain injury and people suffering memory impairment, as well as those involved in sleep and dream research.

http://brainblogger.com/2014/12/15/perception-is-the-opposite-of-reality/

http://www.scienceclarified.com/Oi-Ph/Perception.html

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/perception

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome! I see that you're new - and a fan of Mass Effect!

Did you find this blog through the reddit psychology page? I found it there yesterday.

The title of the article is pretty misleading. All the study is saying is that imagining is processed differently than perception, through totally separate routes. That might be a reason why people who are hallucinating aren't confused about what is real. People who confuse imagining and seeing would likely have a real problem in the brain, like schizophrenia in severe cases. That's my guess. "Widening" makes sense, though. Here, imagining seems applicable to abtraction, maybe visualizing ideas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we engage in what-if contemplation about future actions, there is an emotional component to the experience which helps us evaluate the value of the outcome.  Antonio Damasio, a neuroscientist that I respect greatly has developed what he calls the Somatic Marker Hypothesis that you might find interesting.

Edited by New Buddha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...