I hope this claim-nuclear electricity ten times less expensive than from coal, and without any pollution--to be real. But the odds are against it.
An Italian inventor, Andrea Rossi, claims that a 1000 MW nuclear reactor, being constructed in Greece, will become operational in October 2011. I hope he is right; how can one not be happy to have electricity which is ten times less expensive than from coal, and without any pollution? But I am skeptical. Why? Read this paper:
http://pages.csam.mo...i/cf/rossi.html
But many reputable people take his claim seriously, as illustrated in these two posts:
http://www.rainews24...eo.php?id=23096
How can such optimism be explained?
Ludwik Kowalski (see Wikipedia)
.
.
Reality or fiction?
Started by kowalskil, May 13 2011 04:10 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 13 May 2011 - 04:10 PM
Ludwik Kowalski, author of a free ON-LINE book entitled “Diary of a Former Communist: Thoughts, Feelings, Reality.”
http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/life/intro.html
a testimony based on a diary kept between 1946 and 2004 (in the USSR, Poland, France and the USA).
The more people know about proletarian dictatorship the less likely will they experience is. Please share the link with those who might be interested, especially with young people, and with potential reviewers. Thank you.
http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/life/intro.html
a testimony based on a diary kept between 1946 and 2004 (in the USSR, Poland, France and the USA).
The more people know about proletarian dictatorship the less likely will they experience is. Please share the link with those who might be interested, especially with young people, and with potential reviewers. Thank you.
#2
Posted 04 November 2011 - 04:11 AM
It is hard ! here is my blog ! my think http://mecanicosaere...sion-is-it.html
#3
Posted 06 November 2011 - 12:33 AM
The explanation is: the optimistic have not done the math. Ignorance is work here. Ignorance or worse, as the saying goes "one cannot con an honest man".
Cogito Ergo Libero - "I think therefore I liberate"- Grames
Notes on "Art of Thinking" by Dr. Leonard Peikoff
Notes on "Ayn Rand's Conception of Valuing" by Dr. Greg Salmieri
Notes on "Induction in Physics and Philosophy" by Dr. Leonard Peikoff
Notes on "The Evidence of the Senses" by Dr. David Kelley
Notes on "Unity in Epistemology and Ethics" by Dr. Leonard Peikoff
Notes on "Art of Thinking" by Dr. Leonard Peikoff
Notes on "Ayn Rand's Conception of Valuing" by Dr. Greg Salmieri
Notes on "Induction in Physics and Philosophy" by Dr. Leonard Peikoff
Notes on "The Evidence of the Senses" by Dr. David Kelley
Notes on "Unity in Epistemology and Ethics" by Dr. Leonard Peikoff
#4
Posted 11 November 2011 - 07:03 AM
A catalyst encouraging a nuclear reaction?
No.
He is talking about a compound of some sort that is causing the hydrogen and nickel to collide. This would require the catalyst iteself to be exterting a pretty extreme force on the two atoms, and would likely cause a very extreme rise in temperature and give off large amounts of radiation. Instead, we are seeing temperatures more consistent with a small chemical reaction and almost no radiation being given off.
This has been done many, many times before. Note the sense of urgency to sell the product without proof of its functionality. What will likely happen is he will get hundreds of thousands of dollars in donor money, then will suddenly disappear.
It may be possible that someone ahs achieved cold fusion, but I have serious doubts that this is legitimate.
Remember the coffee pot cold fusion from the university of Utah? Millions of dollars were made through fraud. People like the idea of stealing money in this way and want to do the same thing.
No.
He is talking about a compound of some sort that is causing the hydrogen and nickel to collide. This would require the catalyst iteself to be exterting a pretty extreme force on the two atoms, and would likely cause a very extreme rise in temperature and give off large amounts of radiation. Instead, we are seeing temperatures more consistent with a small chemical reaction and almost no radiation being given off.
This has been done many, many times before. Note the sense of urgency to sell the product without proof of its functionality. What will likely happen is he will get hundreds of thousands of dollars in donor money, then will suddenly disappear.
It may be possible that someone ahs achieved cold fusion, but I have serious doubts that this is legitimate.
Remember the coffee pot cold fusion from the university of Utah? Millions of dollars were made through fraud. People like the idea of stealing money in this way and want to do the same thing.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













