My question relates to the morality of current government programs like the fire department and some EMS divisions.
I personally believe that no one should be forced to pay for these programs, but how would one go about defending against the practical argument of saving lives with them?
My friend, whom I've introduced to the Objectivist philosophy generally appreciates it, but he is working to become an EMS tech with his local fire department and he insists that these programs are necessary, either because he cannot see an alternative or because it sounds awful to him to let someone die, or their house burn if they did not pay a service fee.
How could I take the argument further than stating that it is morally wrong to force people to pay for such services and that the government's sole role should be...? Can the argument be carried farther? Does Dr. Peikoff address this topic in his podcast?
Also, I apologize for any faux pas. First time posting I believe.