Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

CapitalistFred

Regulars
  • Content Count

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

CapitalistFred last won the day on January 15 2012

CapitalistFred had the most liked content!

4 Followers

About CapitalistFred

  • Rank
    Junior Member
  • Birthday 02/17/1964

Previous Fields

  • Country
    United States
  • State (US/Canadian)
    NorthCarolina
  • Relationship status
    Married
  • Sexual orientation
    Straight
  • Real Name
    Fred George
  • Copyright
    Copyrighted
  • Biography/Intro
    Founder/CEO of a small chain of retail stores in NC.
  • Experience with Objectivism
    I have read all of Ayn Rand's books and I am conversant with Objectivism. I would consider myself a student of Objectivism.

    I am a capitalist.
  • School or University
    Trade It
  • Occupation
    Businessman, Founder and CEO of Trade It www.tradeitstores.com

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.tradeitstores.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Wilson, NC
  1. A fellow North Carolinian!!! Welcome. I am a businessman in Wilson, NC. Maybe we will have enough NC Objectivists to get an NC group together.
  2. Capitalism has not failed. Democracy is wholly unsuitable to the governance of anything larger than a smallish city-state. We in the USA live in a (supposedly) constitional republic, not a democracy.... democracy is just another nake for mob rule, and minorities of all sorts tend to fare poorly in any democracy. This idea of an all powerful state enforced meritocracy is immoral as well as being impractical, the state simply has no valid right to confiscate my money after death, I have the right so sell, give away, or bequeath my property at any time, and if I should choose to leave my
  3. "Not neccesarily approving" is not equivalent to negatively judging. You have to read her comment in the context of the times and of the entire statement - had the newspapers put her statement on the front page in that era, the headline would NOT have been "Rand Doesnt Neccesarily Approve of Homosexuality", it would have been "Laws against Homosexuality are Immoral, says noted Author". Rand supported gay rights in an era when that was NOT politically a popular stance. Trying to repackage that into Rand being homophobic is simply wrongheaded. In an era when it was generally accepted that
  4. Rand said that she does not "neccesarily approve of (homosexual) practices" but that all laws against homosexuality should be repealed. How could one be so intolerant as to require anyone to neccesarily approve" of homosexuality? Any individual is free to approve (or not) of any particular behavior, to oppose someone for not "approving" of your choices is ridiculous. Rand bluntly stated that all laws regarding homosexuality should be repealed, which I agree with. You shouldnt be so intolerant as to require my approval for your private behavior, anymore than I will demand your approval fo
  5. An artist is able to burn away all irrelvancies and present a picture that focuses only on what truly matters to the artist. In learning about Reardon, Roark, Dagny Taggart. D'Anconia - these Idealized capitalists are presented as pure examples -it is easy to see the pertinent traits. Reading biographies of the real giants capitalism, one is presented a complex picture of an individual... the important aspects of the person are often buried under many layers of useless personal information. There is value in reading and studying the triumphant caputalists, but one must dig for the timeless
  6. While you are clearly well read and educated, I couldn't disagree more with your conclusions. You state that the Phoenicians engaged in mercantilism and that Rome was more capitalistic, gratuitous assertions that seems to me to be without merit. Phoenicians were capitalistic traders and producers, engaged in import/export production, and private individuals were able to enter into trade and production - THAT is capitalism. Was it perfect lassez faire? Probably not, through the mists of time its really hard to get an accurate picture. I can provide a few dozen links and sources for my co
  7. Rand's moral defense of capitalism has indeed been key for me. After reading Atlas Shrugged and Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal as a teen, I was immune to anti- business jabs and the unearned guilt that collectivists try to heap upon "greedy businessmen". Unearned guilt and self doubt have sabotaged many a promising career, and secure in the moral rightness of my cause, I have been immune to these things. Even more beneficial to me though, was the heroic exanple set by (fictional) people like Hank Rearden, Francisco D'anconia, Dagny Taggart, Howard Roark, John Galt, etc. Long before I kn
  8. Well, the story isnt over yet! I am working hard to grow my business still further. If I am being honest. though, I am more Hank Rearden than I am John Galt.... more a man of action than true philosopher.
  9. I read everything that Rand wrote during my high school years and internalized the lessons and philosophy. Coming from an enterpreneurial background, I was already aware that capitalism was the most practical and effictive economic system, what Objectivism gave me was the knowledge that capitalism was the only moral way for men to deal together, and some idealized characters who epitomized capitalist values. I opened my first business when I was in my early 20s and made a few dollars. Over the next 15 years I opened several different businesses, all did well for a time, but I made some b
  10. Bribes, dishonesty, and violence all can exist in a free society. In a free society, judges would be as likely to be bribed as they are in our mixed economy. The fact that government would be much smaller and disempowered in a free society, however, would mena that dishonest government officials could do far less harm.
  11. I dont know that the Romans were in any way superior to Carthage, the Romans were a militaristic, hyperorganized society, while the Phoenicans were enterpreneurial and comparitively individualistic. There was really only one family in all of Carthage that was interested in military matters, the Barcas, and Hamilcar Barca conquered Spain in order to have a place tp raise an army with which to destroy the evil Romans - a dream which his som Hannibal nearly achieved. It could have turned out either way, Hannibal's Carthaginians ransacked Italy for YEARS and beat EVERY army the Romans sent a
  12. What was it about Isabel Patterson's writings or the possibility that the Phoenicians landed in the new world that made you change your mind? I am not as familiar with Patterson's philosophocal writings as I could be, so perhaps I am being obtuse.
  13. THAT is exciting. I know that I sound like a cliche, but as a businessman, I am extremely busy and have not made time to read and study as much as I would like to.... This will be a great way to overcome that with some formal courses on a topic that is both fascinating and useful.
  14. Bah! This topic has been up for years.... literally. Folks using a convenient shorthand does NOT make Objectivism into a religion, regardless of who may have said otherwise. Quoting others and using the argument from authority, however DOES attempt to make Objectivism into a religion.
×
×
  • Create New...