cre-1

I think that the problem lies in high quality low volume production ,in which demand outstrips supply .And glass supply is a problem with such low volume production ,companies like to produce glass in large volumes by the tonne to make it economically viable for them so a few dozen blanks even a few hundred dosen't interest them and with big glass companies even roland christians name and reputation counts for nothing if he's not placing a large volume order. Roland christian controls all aspects of the production process ,including checking and re-checking each lens until it meets specification . The result of this attention to detail is an outstanding telescope with an independatly tested reputation for performance and quality and exclusivity . Which will attract the flipper an individual with no intrest in the item other than how much they can make and profit from it. However most flippers are of the moment speculators looking for a quick return and profit from the investment.They would have to be pretty masochistic to wait 12 years to buy one to flip for a profit .So i would like to think that most of these scopes will go to genuine enthusiasts who will love cherish and use them. That said i would pose another question what is the morality of profiteering of an owner of a 1992 -1998 180 EDT Which cost between $4995 and $5495 at that time and is on the notification list getting the good news that he is to be the recipient of a new 175mm if he wants it and then advertising his old scope for sale for up to $30 000 Good for him you might say ,and it does release another astrophysics large refractor onto the market ,for someone who would otherwise have no chance to buy one ,but is it right ? But it's a common practice with all low volume luxury items , like ferraries morgan cars etc where demand outstrips demand ,and their is a waiting list .And when anything is availiable for a price.