Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

pieman

Newbies
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About pieman

  • Rank
    Newbie

Previous Fields

  • Country
    United States
  • State (US/Canadian)
    Washington
  • Relationship status
    Single
  • Real Name
    Alex McOmie
  • Copyright
    Copyrighted
  • Biography/Intro
    15 year old from Washington.
  • Experience with Objectivism
    Pretty new to the ideas, but I've agreed with everything I've read so far. Atlas Shrugged was the first Objectivist book I read, I'm currently reading the Fountainhead.
  • School or University
    High School
  • Occupation
    Student
  1. My problem isn't that I don't talk to people or I'm antisocial and I don't know how to get to know people, it's that I'm one of the more popular people in my class and it seems very empty. I have a lot of friends that I talk about sports with or just do nothing with, but I don't enjoy having to spend 7 hours a day with them. My problem is that I'm stuck at school learning things I already know with people that aren't exactly intellectually stimulating. There are definitely those who are enjoyable to be around and great people, but I don't get to see them often with school and preparations for
  2. This is an issue that's been bothering me for a while. I'm in high school, where literally everyone is caught up in others' opinions and either fitting in or standing out. I didn't really get into individualism at all until last year, and I have no feelings toward many of the people I considered great friends when I was younger. It doesn't really bother me that there aren't any individualistic people at school since i can't control it and it doesn't exactly affect me, but I'm unsure of how to exist at school and home. I'm sure everyone here has had this type of experience, so I'm wondering how
  3. I'm trying to write a paper on laissez-faire capitalism, and the argument I keep running into is that people have an obligation to sustain the government because the government creates the infrastructures that allow them to gain wealth in the first place (roads, patent systems, courts, etc.). It seems to me like the best argument against this idea is that private individuals and companies could do this as a business endeavor, rather than a 'public service' and that just because other people voted to pay for these services doesn't mean I'm obligated to (aka a majority can't vote away the rights
×
×
  • Create New...