Hayden Donnelly

I'd read this! Sounds pretty good. I'm guessing you are well acquainted with this kind of material (video below I mean!) (and all the other mises institute stuff) judging from your heavy reliance on arbitrage systems. Nice to find another like-minded individual who thinks the same way I do. If you really want some feedback I guess I don't really get why the judges are appointed by vote though (in an ancap society)... And why they could not instead put themselves forward as trusted individuals (could be anyone in theory) who know the law or are well established rational thinkers on principled grounds and further develop market demand due to their growing track record for passing unbiased judgement on arbitrage cases (more of a meritocracy). It worries me to have to resort to a voting system for something as important as appointing people as important as judges. I trust a free market much more because the judges are thus much more responsive to their "customers". The judges might even stand when THE ACCUSED / DEFENDANT enters the court room (rather than everyone else standing) and would want to deliver a well heard and even-handed judgement in clear view of all who may be bearing witness to the court case (would gain more popularity and reputation --> $$). Just my 2 cents..