A federal judge ruled the "supremacists" had a right to protest. It seems the reason violence occurred is because "counter protesters" gathered in an effort to block the lawful expression of free speech. Notwithstanding the murderous act of one individual who drove his vehicle into the crowd, is there a reasonable basis to blame the supremacists for the violence?
I understand their position is objectionable, however the true value of the right to free speech is for the protection of speech some may consider objectionable.
How is the action of the counter protesters different from re
