1. If an argument is given that cannot be refuted, the other must conceed the point.
2. Debaters must agree to continue until one is convinced of the others correctness.
I will attempt to show that Objectivist views are not all constructive and that a subtly different view of things that incorporates some other philosophy is a much better approach.
Pure Objectivism Vs. Mixed Philosophy
in Debates
Posted
Rules:
1. If an argument is given that cannot be refuted, the other must conceed the point.
2. Debaters must agree to continue until one is convinced of the others correctness.
I will attempt to show that Objectivist views are not all constructive and that a subtly different view of things that incorporates some other philosophy is a much better approach.