Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Jon Pizzo

Patron
  • Content Count

    69
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Jon Pizzo

  • Rank
    Junior Member
  • Birthday 01/17/1989

Previous Fields

  • Country
    United States
  • State (US/Canadian)
    Ohio
  • Real Name
    Jon Pizzo
  • Copyright
    Copyrighted
  • Biography/Intro
    I believe in reason and rationality, purpose and optimism.
  • School or University
    Miami University
  • Occupation
    Writer, Student

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Cincinnati
  • Interests
    Philosophy, Ethics, Politics, Writing, History
  1. My main point is this: I disagree with anyone relying on how they look for any sort of confidence or self esteem, or even approval from others. I think that one's mind/principles is the soul most important aspect of how they should be judged. I do not do anything to enhance my appearance, other than personal grooming. However, what most of you seem to be saying is this: in reality, at least for an objectivist, it is the opposite. You are not relying on your looks for your self esteem, but your looks are a product of your self esteem, or what you want to portray. All I'm saying is that for me a
  2. Very good point, one which I hadn't considered yet. So I have learned something. If a woman is doing it for the reasons you stated, then I see no problem with it whatsoever. I wouldn't do it, but that has nothing to do with being against it. I think that the problem is, like you said, most women don't do it for honorable reasons, they do it because they are self conscious and care too much about their physical appearance in the eyes of others. Capitalism Forever: If I looked into the mirror every day, what reason would there be for me to feel like vomiting? Because I was "ugly"? Why sh
  3. I think that clothes are different, because they are something that society requires in order for a man to live freely. A perfect instance is portrayed in the Fountainhead when Roark says something along the lines of "I will wear their clothes because I am required to, but I will never do this." I can't remember exactly where in the book it is, but I'm sure you can remember it. You cannot walk down the street naked, because society literally would not allow you to do so. Wearing makeup and other sorts of vanity are different, in my opinion. As for wearing "nice" clothes. Would Dagny buy a busi
  4. I guess it really doesn't matter if Dagny would wear makeup or any sort of thing related, but I don't really see how, someone believing the things she believes would go out of their way to create a false image to portray to others. When I say false I mean this: The makeup on your face is not what you really look like, and by putting it on you are trying to create the illusion that you look different than you do. Why would any objectivist do this, when in my understanding it violates A=A? You cannot be what you are not, you should not try to look like someone you don't look like. That is the wa
  5. I haven't seen you post any arguments in this thread. You keep saying that objectivism is not the right philosophy, but I haven't seen any reasons why (if you have in another thread, i apologize in advance). You keep saying that we need to be tolerant of other kinds of philosophies, but tell me, honestly, how do you expect us to do that, when all of those philosophies offer us only one thing in the end? The believers in objectivism know exactly what I'm talking about, and you will too someday, I hope, for your own good.
  6. He (Rourke) is one of the kinds of people I was referring to when I created this thread. He attacks Objectivism, but I have not seen him give one direct argument against it. It seems to me that he is afraid that perhaps only one philosophy can be the right and rational one, and, just like mystical spiritualists, insists that any road is the right road as long as the intentions are honorable.
  7. I have yet to hear anyone make this point in a more clear, concise way. It's exactly correct, they can't both be right. The sooner people start realizing that, the better.
  8. That is horrible. And people that tell us we are wrong think that they know what the word 'evil' really means. I am sure that your wish will be fulfilled, because you are the kind of person who will make it happen, without the help of their crutch of a God
  9. I agree. While everything about the extremist Muslim culture deeply angers and disturbs me, I could never validate using open aggression on a culture. To expand what Moose said about Nazi Germany, I think that we are on top when it comes to military might in the world, but think about what would happen if the rest of the entire free world decided to engage us in war because they viewed us as fascist basically committing, well, Genocide. (That is assuming we do like $$$ said and wage war against the muslim world.) Also, consider what it would do inside our own country. If we took that action, I
  10. Two good points. I don't know much about her history, but yes, by the way the media is portraying her, you can't tell that she was corrupt. If she was, then no side is greatly better than the other I guess. From what I've heard, she wanted womens' rights, democratic voting, and free trade, but I'll have to look into it more. Also, I agree that elections there are a joke, but at least if they are having elections, they have no one to blame for their leaders' faults but themselves.
  11. Ironically enough, I posted a topic about this woman a month back, when islamic extremists launched a failed assassination attempt in Pakistan. Now, the former Prime Minister and Democracy advocate actually has been assassinated. This angers me deeply, because, as usual, the perpetrator took his own life via suicide bomb (while taking the lives of more than 20 bystanders as well). The reason I am discussing this is because I wonder what effect it will have on the upcoming elections, or whether or not Musharaff will even allow elections.
  12. I don't think that a man needs to "find a reason" to live. It depends on what you're talking about here. Are you talking about stepping in front of a bullet for someone, or are you talking about someone asking you to sacrifice yourself so that they can live? If you're talking about stepping in front of a bullet for someone, here's what you need to remember: when force is used against someone, logic and reason go out the window. There can really be no 'logical' action at this point when a gun is fired. I would step in front of a bullet to save someone I cared about, not as a sacrifice, but b
  13. I watched the trailor, and quite frankly, I don't know how this person could get this footage without being an accomplice, as no criminal in their 'right mind' would let a random observer, for example, film them killing a rival gang member.
×
×
  • Create New...