Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Tenderlysharp

Regulars
  • Posts

    319
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by Tenderlysharp

  1. On 1/28/2021 at 10:51 AM, Eiuol said:

    Why did you post that picture? 

    People use a volitional spirit to play with things that scare them, like halloween.  

     Mammals need to feel safe and in control.  The virus makes us feel like we are out of control.  If you can't control the virus you might try to control other people as an attempt to alleviate anxiety.  People are irrational in predictable ways, whether you are for or against the mask, you can find an avalanche of 'evidence' online to support what you want to believe.  

    The anxiety the virus causes one person doesn't affect another the same depending on how many people you know personally who died from it.  The anxiety of being told what to do by other people can be just as painful, especially if you have suffered personal abuse, institutional abuse, or malpractice.  

    Some people have a very strong physiological disgust mechanism that makes them germ phobic, while plumbers are elbow deep in human waste on a daily basis for years.  

    and the executioners face is always well hidden

  2. I moved to Wyoming for a few years, back in Kearns now.  

    It seems like there are a lot of loud obnoxious angry kids gripped by irrational political ideology in the Utah Atheists group on Facebook.  

  3. On 12/23/2020 at 6:13 AM, whYNOT said:

    If this infection were a plot hatched by an evil alien genius ;) to conquer Earth without resistance, he read human nature exactly right and will succeed. Many will give up freedom for a little bit of safety. 

    Thinking more about this.  If oppressive governments are pouring billions of dollars into "Anti-Human" social media ad campaigns to polarize all sides of the American political spectrum... are they getting their moneys worth?  Their approach works on their own people who are crushed by more than 50,000 years of slave mentality.  

    What do they seem to be gaining as they vicariously dabble with the concept of free speech in America?  How do you get good at spotting the clever tricks of oppressors who think they can push the "empathy button" without actually feeling it?

    The empathy center in your brain expands in proportion to the freedom of volition in your surrounding area.  This is why the difficulty and solitude of colder climates produce a greater percentage of independent, resilient, and benevolent individuals.  Native Americans had 10,000 years of much greater volition to spread out.  Early slave traders were perplexed at how impossible it is to violate a Native American's volition.  

    In each oppressed person there is an oppressor who believes that accepting subversion will make them part of something stronger.  Americans seem to love the underdog as a celebration of volition.  How do you temper your empathy to free the oppressed with understanding that the responsibility of freedom is overwhelmingly horrifying to those who have been punished their whole lives for any attempt to think for themselves?  

  4. On 1/18/2021 at 3:02 PM, Hermes said:

    We should have been doing this all along,

    How is it that a year ago it was much more common to feel derision toward germaphobes and hypochondriacs?  

    Humans die without contact, I wouldn't trade anything for my 4 year old niece jumping my lap and giving me a kiss on the cheek with her booger face.  I get a tissue, clean up her face and tell her she is adorable.  A germ or virus is nothing compared to human consciousness.  Why teach children to feel overwhelming helplessness in the face of something you absolutely have the intelligence to adapt to?  

  5. On 12/23/2020 at 7:18 AM, JASKN said:

    I think friendliness is very important right now. However, I have no tolerance or sympathy for tattlers or do-gooders, and if they stop me they get a sharp dismissive reply.

    The 'Do no harm, take no crap' approach is interesting.  Last year YouTube was repeatedly recommending a hostage negotiation masterclass, looking into it I discovered a... language within the language... that I have been spending the year learning.  It has absolutely evolved the way I approach conflict and difficult conversations.  I am starting to actually look forward to challenges.  I am kind of feeling like the 'shit head whisperer'.  

    I watch a group called Utah Atheists who seem to be dominated by marxists shouting down every awkward individual who is newly questioning their faith in the conservative state.  The curious semi-atheist tries to see if its worth it to take a lonely jump from one community to another.  

    After seeing hundreds of posts in support of twitters freedom by people who constantly post threads taxing the life out of business owners...  I started a thread about freedom of speech separate from the Trump debate and got a hundred people telling me to shut up and go away.  Understanding history is my incentive to engage.  The thought came that the aggression is a manifestation of volition, and not to take it personally.  If they want to use their freedom of speech to try to shame me into conceding on deeply meaningful issues, it won't work.  They have obviously never contemplated in depth.  Why let it take me for a ride?  

    I remember Ayn Rand saying the rats will scatter at the first sound of a human step.  I could have handled some of my reaction better, my patience seems to have paid off, the group is loosening some restrictions.  If my words inspire a person who is uncomfortable but can't explain why, then I feel like I am not standing idly by letting my home be overrun with stupidity.  

    What does this have to do with wearing masks.... to negotiate with a hostage taker, you spend the beginning of the conversation listening, mirroring, using tactical empathy, calibrated questions, to let the control freak feel like he is in control.  These skills are awkward at first and might feel like wearing a mask, but they can become integrated into your personality as an evolutionary approach.  A human will irrationally defend volition, letting him have it changes his brain chemistry and brings his higher reasoning online.  

  6. Look around your home.  Is there anything there that gives you energy?  Validates your consciousness?  Reminds you of the unique manifestations of your identity?  Any song, book, film, tactile object that resonates with the possibility of a goal worth aiming toward?  Is there something you could put on your wall that will add a spring to your step, or release the tense confusion of a recent argument because it resonates with a problem solving mindset? 

    As one works toward building a solid foundation in reality, aesthetics is where humanity has a chance to evolve creatively through the contribution of each individual.  It takes a great deal of personal resilience to create something that is true, to the epic depths of your mind, regardless of whether another person might recognize some universal appeal.  

  7. On 12/23/2020 at 6:13 AM, whYNOT said:

    What metaphysics? Nobody is in full contact with reality (poorly substituted by the pallid, rehashed 'reality' from TV and our e-devices), and what epistemology, anyway, where little rationality could be sustained in this non-real, under-active dream state? 

    This has been on my mind a lot lately.  It seems each person struggles in this dream state to a certain degree.  It looks like contact with reality takes a tremendous amount of time, effort, and the evolutionary advantage of a developed frontal cortex.  How do I describe the dawning I encountered when Ayn Rand gave me my first real taste of what reality might be... after spending thirty years of doing the best I could with the primitive tools I had.  

    On 12/23/2020 at 6:13 AM, whYNOT said:

    And what "identity", one's human, physical self-identity and 'other'-identity, that distinguishes one from the crowd - when individuality is hidden behind a face covering, you can't hardly recognize an acquaintance, struggle to hear their muffled voice and are not permitted to touch each other? 

    What "identity"... identity as a man, as a romantic, as a fertile animal, as a brother, as a friend, as an internet acquaintance.  Man seems especially hungry for a hero of consciousness to access a path or foundation with resilience to weather the storm.  

    On 12/23/2020 at 6:13 AM, whYNOT said:

    If this infection were a plot hatched by an evil alien genius ;) to conquer Earth without resistance, he read human nature exactly right and will succeed. Many will give up freedom for a little bit of safety. 

    Plague scares are not uncommon throughout history, what kind of mind has gotten through with more benevolence and freedom intact?  

    On 12/23/2020 at 6:13 AM, whYNOT said:

    You mean I need more than one mask, Tenderly!?

    one of em has eyes as big as jolly ranchers.  I've been focusing on neural science and psychology lately.  Carl Jung's thoughts are interesting.  The ancient use of masks in culture to get a grip on negative emotion...  Halloween is our yearly tradition dressing up as our favorite boogie man to make fun of insecurities it seems.  

  8. On 12/22/2020 at 7:16 PM, dream_weaver said:

    Faceless. As in one's mouth and nose obscured by a mask (as has been typically been observed.)

    The opportunity to express one's self to others still transcends this protocol. At this stage, our eyes and ears are not obscured.

    My daughter and her husband expressed the fact that they had likely contracted CoViD-19. The symptoms, thus far, have been relatively mild. She, being in the nursing field, indicated that her two boys were to develop their immunity to CoViD-19 over the Christmas holiday—should they contract it— changing the usual course of the last 15 years of our historical tradition of having gotten together for this holiday season.

    I respect her decision, and conversely, she respects mine.

     

    It seems freedom twinkles around the edges... these moments where a person has the consciousness to show the rare benevolence that is still cherished in America.  

    It was difficult worrying for my son when he had Covid last February.  I compare that initial worry with wondering if he was going to get it all year, and appreciate how we got it over with.  Our family has also been missing the usual get togethers, luckily my brother is building a large patio so we can catch up this spring.  Mutual respect is crucial for relationships, its good to see someone doing what they can with a difficult situation.  

  9. How many masks do you wear?

    I chose to present and ponder this topic as a Metaphysical and Epistemologcal exploration of identity.  

    This thread is not so much to argue the benefits and safety of the mask.  Another thread seems to do a thorough job in favor of the mask: https://forum.objectivismonline.com/index.php?/topic/34048-rebloggedit-is-not-self-interest-to-take-illness-lightly/&tab=comments#comment-368272

    I wear the mask every day, I had Covid in February, never been more sick in my life... I definitely don’t want my three grandmothers in their 90’s to die from it, and I miss hugging them terribly.  I've been seriously trying to figure out how I might be able to quarantine for two weeks just to have the privilege of being in the same room with each of them.  

    You can submit to the mask and still hate it and still speak out against how dehumanizing it can be.  As well as give careful attention to the ways opportunistic power struggle groups seize upon fear.    

    The Chinese Congress spent $2 Billion for covid in the U.S.  That is $40M in each state… Money from China is slave labor money.  The money seems to be spent on social media ad campaigns promoting their agenda. You can spot the underlying theme in a deluge of memes that try to alienate, belittle, polarize, dehumanize, take for granted, and intellectually cripple America for respecting freedom and success.

    If you are faceless, what identity do you have?

  10. Intelligence tests were first designed to comb through people in poverty, identify those with potential and invest in their education.  

    Some contributing factors of intelligence having upward mobility are basic nutrition, stable emotional environment, caring family members, not being shot at, willingness to take on responsibility, negotiation skills, writing/speaking skills, openness, autonomy...

    Part of the flag waving American Pride is the implication that humans seem to have gotten a lot smarter in the last 200 years in proportion to their freedom and value for individual independence.  

  11. 50 minutes ago, Nicky said:

    There's far more to it than that.

    I agree.  

    2 hours ago, Nicky said:

    Jordan Peterson (who I think is a brilliant thinker and public speaker) makes a very interesting point

    I've been on a Jordan Peterson youtube marathon the last couple weeks, as I do with many people who interest me.  His lectures are packed so full of information.  He reads a book a day, and says the more you know the more you realize how much more you don't know.  I've sensed his limits on a few issues, wouldn't it be nice to have a couple hundred more years to take things in and put them together in useful ways.  

  12. 1 hour ago, Eiuol said:

    Do you mean the outliers being included in the population "shifts" the mean? 

    In this image, the space in the center (the mean) shows the average IQ scores for the vast majority are the same, and the real differences arise in the small gaps at the edges which are the outliers.  

    One Standard Deviation.jpg

  13. 48 minutes ago, Nicky said:

    no one else really matters

    The people I care about matter to me in many different ways, their intelligence being one aspect.  

    38 minutes ago, Nicky said:

    the radical split in prison population, by sex...pretty sure it is above 9 to 1 in "favor" of men

    In prison drug use has probably diminished the IQ's that many had when they were younger.  There are also some very intelligent bastards in prison.  

    This got me thinking about another statistic Jordan Peterson was talking about.  That 10% of Americans, the outliers, do not have a high enough IQ to be allowed into the military.  They are not smart enough to be shot at, yet they still need to be kept occupied with something productive to do so they don't run around tearing the world up.  One can have very low IQ and very high trait conscientiousness and still do a simple repetitive job much better than a robot can.  

  14. Thank you DavidOdden for taking time to consider and express your thoughts on this subject.

    2 hours ago, DavidOdden said:

    First, the question needs to be what a school should be, which makes more explicit that schools have a purpose and we must identify that purpose ... Being “alternative” is not an objective value, but following different practices could be valuable.

    The context for alternative I am pondering is a model that reflects the amazing technological advances we have seen over the last thirty years.  By 1918, every state required students to complete elementary school.  These schools were designed to meet the masses of farmers moving into cities for industrial work.  The industrial model of children flowing through school like a conveyor belt hasn't changed much in the last hundred years.

    Some ideas.  Bringing together specialists, in many fields, who are learning about how the brain works.  Optimizing windows that open at certain periods of development where the acquiring of specific skills are accelerated.  Flexibility to foster students to move forward more quickly with what they like and are good at.  Skills at sifting through massive amounts of information in order to quickly identify, organize, prioritize information that is useful.

    3 hours ago, DavidOdden said:

    IMO, the currently optimal approach is IPE with well-structured online supplementary material.

    Yes, this has been on my mind a lot.  My son is eleven years old.  He loves learning and hates school.  Something is terribly wrong with that.  I haven't found an online school that seems like a better option.  He has friends he really likes in school.  I would be happy to join or help build a system that has half or a quarter of in-person education while also seeing him much more dynamically engaged in an online education that plays more like a video game than the repetitive drudgery he keeps bringing home for homework.  In the last six years we have only had one teacher who put real thought into her job.  

    I've watched hundreds of You-Tube videos about creativity and education.  Many in-person schools seem amazing, but I don't have the money for tuition, and moving expenses.  I am currently working on setting clear goals to figure out how to move into a better life situation, which takes time.  The online resources I am finding are incredibly helpful, while at the same time I am feeling frustrated that this information wasn't available to me in school twenty years ago.

  15. If Jordan Peterson's premise is correct (He has done more research into the subject than I have) I might contemplate how this affects me on an individual level.

    If I realize I am talking to a person who belongs to a demographic with an average higher IQ, and I theoretically have a median IQ, I might assume they have a 60% chance of being smarter than me.  If a person belongs to the bottom 40% of their group, and they haven't tested their own IQ they might have a higher chance of inflating their own intellectual value by associating inappropriately with the extreme cases in the group they identify with.  

    I see this with people who are interested in Objectivism, who obviously have no where near the intellectual capacity of Ayn Rand, attempting go exert some authority by using her words.  

    At the same time, extremely talented individuals who belong to any group you identify with have the power of being role models you can understand, and you may improve your own intelligence by learning what you can from each of them.  

  16. Unrealistic expectations kill any chance at a meaningful relationship with friends, partners, or family.  

    In the beginning people look for virtue signaling, and red flags.  If she is a single mother, she may be struggling with her own responsibilities.  If the father of her child has been irresponsible, she may not be handling her emotional damage as well as she would like.  Women have a much shorter fertility window, so if she wants another child she may be in a hurry to find someone who seems to really want to be with her.  She may not want to seem needy, as though a man is doing her a big favor by taking on a family that isn't biologically his.  A lack of fatherly tendencies a man shows toward potential step children are huge deal breakers as well.  

    The impact of biological forces and hormones can be overwhelming to clear cognitive function in some.  If you can see and treat her like a real human being regardless of your sexual desire, it is a sign of strong frontal cortical activity and executive brain function.  Sexual desire placed above the value of the individual most often leads to a pattern of cheating.  

    Humans have only had sexual equality for a hundred years in a small part of the world, so we are all still trying to figure out how to be ok with each other.  In the past a woman wasn't allowed to be friends with a man unless he was her brother or cousin.  

    Establishing true friendships with the opposite sex has provided me, and individuals I know with valuable insight,  it raises your standards.  

    If you know any happy couples in healthy relationships you might want to spend time communicating with both partners about how they negotiate the challenges they have faced.   If you want a lasting relationship you need an honest reliable partner who is going to be there through health issues, tragedy, misunderstanding. Overwhelming insecurities and unwillingness to communicate will lead to many problems down the road.  

    Think of this as a valuable learning experience.  Relationships are not going to be pain free, that is one reason we test each other in the beginning.  

  17. Have you ever had a personal sentimental item, attached to the memory of a person who is gone, stolen from you?  I have.  No amount of shouting in the street about what is fair is going to stop human malevolence and ignorance.  If I want to approach fair human interactions, I've got to build my own foundation, inspire the cretins to educate themselves, and not waste time bloviating to a choir of one.  

    I come here to find real, unique, interesting intelligent human beings, who happen to adore Ayn Rand for reasons she might have appreciated.  I am not here to run around in circles with puppets who spout ideologies with no thought of what any of it means to them personally, individually here and now in the real world.

  18. There is a difference between equalization of opportunity and equalization of outcome.

    Equalization of opportunity means keeping the starving masses from uprising and destroying the system, while fostering social mobility so that talent can rise from poverty.  The loss of millions of individual lives has already shown that we can not force/guarantee equalization of outcome.  Working to fight unearned second hand theft is important.  Outliers in society are a fact, do you want them to steal your car, or a portion of your paycheck, some portion of your time addressing their source and reduction?  There is a problem, it has always been a problem, something is going to happen, which do you choose?  

    People often use portions of Ayn Rand's text without fully integrating her entire philosophy. They haven't earned it.  It isn't proper to tell someone what to do, it doesn't work. What one ought to do, and I try, is to be very careful in choosing words.   

    Human societies (including Objectivism) are based on hierarchies.  Ayn Rand is at the top, there are varying degrees of competence within the structure of individuals who volunteer to take part in this particular hierarchy.  Just as in America, where Objectivism was born, there are conservative and liberal objectivists.  When an individual in this social space goes to an extreme each individual chooses how he or she wants to deal with it.  

  19. Questions I am asking myself within the context of education:

    What would a modern alternative comprehensive online school look like?  

    In what context would you be willing to contribute to such an enterprise?  

    What does it mean to read a book a day?

    What role does humor play in the development of consciousness?  

    How does a call to "Responsibility" and "Meaning" affect the rising generation?

    How does one develop a balance between ones own body and mind in healthy integration?  

    How does one practice speaking in a compelling way that keeps the interest of your audience?  

    What is the value of self awareness?  Do others find you self aware in an argument?

    How do you hone your skills toward a contentious audience?

    How do you organize vital information to recall in crucial situations?  

    When you think, do you develop arguments within yourself in order to prepare to meet your opposition?

    How much effort have you made to improve your writing skill?

    Who is your target audience?  Ayn Rand wrote for herself, but was also reaching toward her ideal man.

    Would your ideal man have any critical feedback for the way you conduct yourself in the world?

    Do you have some sense of what you don't know?  

    Have you set goals for what you want to accomplish?

    In what ways do you abdicate the responsibility toward your aspirations?

    In what ways do you create meaning in your life?

    Are there disciplines that have become corrupt that I think I might be interested in and able to take on?

    What are the common conditions that lead to war?  

    Are there good ways to direct my skills toward entrepreneurial pursuits?

    What have I learned through the phenomena of social media?  Why leave those venues to my adversaries?  

    What are the consequences of recent technological breakthroughs?

    How can I develop creatively in all aspects of life?

    Has the quality of life of the people I value and love (and who love me) been sufficiently improved by my presence in their lives?

    Considering Existence and Consciousness are corollaries: What symbolic void is being left in the world by me not attempting living up to my potential?

    How do I quantify the education I have acquired?

    How can I find a way to travel and visit more of this planet in a more intimate way?

    How can a person be taught to read, think, speak, present, and negotiate in a more efficient manner?

    What is the Intellectual Dark Web?

    Clinical Psychologist, and Evolutionary Biologist Jordan Peterson is working toward the development of a less expensive online school.

     

    Considering hierarchies are biologically linked to achievement, how do I develop my own competence hierarchy that benefits me as an individual?

  20. On 10/16/2018 at 9:20 PM, Eiuol said:

    For the record, ARI did not embrace Jordan Peterson. Nor should they, because he's more of a postmodernist thinker (despite his protests against it). He wasn't at OCON because people agreed with him and his views. 

    I wonder specifically where the distinctions of Jordan Peterson's view of objective reality differ from Objectivism.  Ayn Rand used terms like 'God No'  and 'God bless you' not because she believed in a literal God, but because she liked what those phrases meant.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZMIbo_DxJk&t=1139s

  21. On 5/15/2018 at 6:14 PM, EC said:

    it's just that person's opinion.....can only be answered correctly via quote.

    "You don’t think through another’s brain and you don’t work through another’s hands. When you suspend your faculty of independent judgment, you suspend consciousness. To stop consciousness is to stop life. Second-handers have no sense of reality. Their reality is not within them, but somewhere in that space which divides one human body from another. "-Ayn Rand, For The New Intellectual

    A living person is to parrot someone who has died... for a philosophy of life?  I don't believe any living Objectivist claims to be Ayn Rand.  Only you can direct the action you take to quote her.  If it were all quotes it would be like she was just here talking to herself... 

×
×
  • Create New...