Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

andre_sanchez

Regulars
  • Posts

    117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by andre_sanchez

  1. He begins to act irrationally, because he values his wife more than this cure, but has chosen to spend time on creating the cure and not on spending time with his wife.

    No, he does not. The only reason he works on his cure is to save his wife so he can spend time with her. He is obsessed not with the cure, by itself, but with his wife.

    In fact, according to the movie, if Izzy had waited just a little bit, his work would have saved her. The author is clearly saying "He could have saved her, but what's the point? Just accept death. Death is your master, bitch."

    However, they also make the point that "death is an act of creation" quite a bit as well

    Which is complete and utter nonsense. Nothing is created by death, it is the exact opposite of creation. Life is an act of creation, death is the absense of life.

    I believe it makes the point that life will continue even after a particular individual dies

    Yes, that is true. In a very real sense, the first living being on earth is still alive today in billions of different mutations. But we don't value life because of cellular mechanics, we value life because of identity. While in purely biological terms, you could say death doesn't even really exist (we just change bodies), the fact is that our identities are destroyed. To worship this "greater form of life" is a form of collectivism.

    you do see death worship, it is embodied in the evil character of the Grand Inquisitor

    He is punishing the queen because she seeks eternal life on earth. The movie's creator then

    punishes the Conquistador for seeking such life by turning him into a plant.

    I think you could say the Gran Inquisitor is actualy the point of the movie, not the villain. At best, he simply belongs to a different strand of death worship.

    more to show that death is what gives our lives so much meaning.

    Life gives death meaning, not the other way around. Writing this, I remembered the immortal robot analogy. It's important to remember though that the analogy is a demonstration that values are the things that protect us from death, that help us towards life. They are not given value by death, but by life.

    Because we are mortal, we have to choose to live. The ideal in this movie is the character of Izzi. She doesn't choose death. Death is thrust upon her. She chooses to accept death, but value immensely what she has left.

    Yet the charachters who choose to live, are all given death by the movie's creator. Doesn't that tell you something? Up until

    the Conquistador was turned into a plant

    I thought the bad elements might just had been part of an elaborate attempt to make the point that life is good and we should seek it. The way the movie starts with the Conquistador charging forward (and surviving) while his fellow soldiers run in fear (and are killed) was probably the best part of the whole movie.

  2. I decided to rent this again to see why I liked it so much. I wasn't dissapointed. I liked it more than the first time I saw it. I deals with several themes tied to objectivism. The ending deals with justice (the importance of praising what is good), the movie itself is centered by the idea of goal-directed effort and hard work, and attempts to put it in it's proper context (the selfish creator).

    A few quotes:

    -... if you choose to compete in the IG classic you can come back. How's that? Hike'll give you a chance to think things over.

    - What if I choose not to come back?

    - Haley... tell you the truth... nobody cares. Nobody cares what ya do.

    - The only reason I'm doing these tricks is because somebody somewhere said "I don't care if this is nuts and I don't care if it hurts. I'm doing it. I'm gonna climb this insanely high mountain. Watch me." When you're the first to climb a mountain in gymnastics, they name it after you. A Gienger. A Rufolva. A Tchusovitina. A Shaposhnikova. They all rocked. And we salute you.
  3. I found this book to be very interesting and a great debunking of the whole "muslims hate us because of our imperialism" crap. They were enslaving not only europeans, but -americans-, pretty much the second after America was born. It also shows how the only way to deal with such thugs is by a show of force. Thugs, by definition, cannot be dealt with through reason and diplomacy.

    http://www.audible.com/adbl/site/products/...UseBVCookie=Yes

  4. The movie was very well made, and if it had ended differently, I would have highly recommended it. It was very good visualy, that I cannot deny. The death worship however, is not something I can forgive. It is an anti-life movie and directly opposes objectivist philosophy. It degrades the very core of objectivism, that reason is man's tool of survival, and tells the viewer that we should embrace death, and that if we don't, death will embrace us anyway. The premise the movie is built on is the complete opposite of objectivism.

  5. Disgusting...

    These two boxers ran away from the cuban delegation in Rio de Janeiro, during the Panamerican games. Fidel had the entire delegation brought back to Cuba, not even letting them stay enough to be awarded their medals, in fear that there would be mass defection. Now these two man got arrested by police and sent back to Cuba on a special chartered plane. Under the control of Fidel, and clearly scared as hell, they say they are very revolutionary and ran away because they got overweight and got scared they would be disqualified...

    These things make me sick. Let this serve as a warning to all cubans: Don't try and defect in a place run by those who admire and love the guy who keeps you in slavery.

×
×
  • Create New...