Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Craig24

Regulars
  • Posts

    562
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Everything posted by Craig24

  1. The word "solution" implies an ability to make them learn respect for rights. You think that's actually possible?
  2. That's fine but you must show me what Israel is doing wrong here. Hamas has openly stated they exist to destroy Israel. Hamas backs that stated intent in action (terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians). Israel is left with two options: Destroy Hamas (risking collateral damage) or take no action and be destroyed by Hamas. If you see a third option that secures Israel from future attacks that somehow leaves Palestinians unharmed I'm all ears.
  3. Yeah everyone does have rights but what point are you making? How is this related to the actions necessary for Israeli security against terrorism? Or is it your claim that acknowledging such rights prohibits risking collateral damage in a retaliation by Israel? What option does Israel have that they are not undertaking that would adequately protect Israel and prevent the collateral damage that so many object to?
  4. Israeli explains why the pro-palestinian view is wrong:
  5. I'm confused. Who is claiming Thunberg is a follower of Kaczinski?
  6. Are you asking if the govt should regulate the degree of ambiguity in a TOS contract on a social media site?
  7. You have my attention now. I'm against innocent folks being eradicated. Of course you have proof of this.... I have my doubts. https://theconversation.com/putins-claims-that-ukraine-is-committing-genocide-are-baseless-but-not-unprecedented-177511 https://www.usip.org/publications/2022/04/how-kremlin-distorts-responsibility-protect-principle
  8. I wonder what the German Constitution said in from 1933-1945? One wonders......
  9. Is this supposed to be evidence that Russia's invasion was provoked?
  10. He's talking about Jon Letendre. I wonder if he ever met this Q?
  11. A civil war started by who, against who? Why is it Russia's problem? Is the current conflict a rescue operation to save innocent victims of this civil war?
  12. Yes becuz Russia has no nukes, no military, no history of belligerence and no territorial ambitions. It's ok Europe. Go right ahead and disarm if you wish. Russia is no threat to you.
  13. I have to ask... (I may regret this).... what do you mean by Russia's security situation? Who was or is planning/threatening to attack or invade Russia?
  14. For Putin there was always the option not to invade.
  15. I think it would have satisfied almost everyone here if this stupid war NEVER HAPPENED!
  16. Wait, what? Has there been any so called false flags in this conflict? Any at all?
  17. I stand corrected. Upon further thought, this isn't at all surprising. Holocaust denial has been censored in Europe for some time. I don't approve of it of course.
  18. I'm calling BS on this claim. Which western governments have censored RT and Sputnik? If you are able to link to RT as a source it's obviously not banned where you live and it certainly isn't banned here in the US.
  19. As a follow up to my last post here's a NY Times article on Russian censorship since the beginning of the conflict. From the article:
  20. Do you acknowledge that Russia literally censors any and all news that contradicts the pro Russian narrative on the conflict? Why do they do that? Do you approve of that? How can that not cast at least a reasonable doubt on the veracity of what is reported?
  21. Ok but aren't we saying a woman has a right to terminate the pregnancy? Why would this be relevent?
×
×
  • Create New...