Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Juxtys

Regulars
  • Posts

    279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Juxtys

  1. Some women in Lithuania, in order to get more money from social insurance during their "mother's holiday", cheated their social record by paying bigger social insurance fees and signaling that their salaries are bigger, thus getting more money from social insurance. This way of fraud was so effective that some of them managed to get a hundred thousdand dollars a year, which is huge money in Lithuania.

    This year, however, such women are threatened by jail for comitting fraud against the social insurance and hundreds of young women(along with their babies in some cases) might go to jail. On one hand, they broke a law and are responsible for it, on the other hand, what would become of their children if their mothers went to jail for ten years or so while they were growing up? How to solve such a practical and ethical problem?

  2. I agree. I've run across many "ghost" towns here in Colorado during my hiking adventures over the years. The remaining structures aren't usable, nor the building foundations if they even have any. And they are usually at high elevations far from existing utilities. There's no problem, IMO, with living at a high elevation or a remote location, a la Galt's Gulch, but I don't think there would be any advantage to buying a ghost town.

    Bob

    What about the roads in them? I'd think they'd be pretty much usable still. And the structures, though not very "comfortable" might still provide a cheap source for building materials of new buildings while the former utilities might generate the first revenues for scrap metal deals. All what might be quite expensive and difficult is fresh water and electricity supply. I think we could simply get anything else we might need. Buying a ghost town is better than an empty land since it retains some infrastructure. Besides, internet business could be conducted even from there after we establish our internet connection.

  3. I recently had an idea how to found an objectivist settlement easily:

    We just need to reclaim the ghost towns. Some of them have a decent, though abandoned, infrastructure, are easy to buy out while have some goals to mask the invasion of them with, like attempting their redevelopment to bring life to abandoned towns or limit the damage to nature since reusing the same infrastructure would be more resource-efficient than building everything anew.

    A project like that might even get some government funding or we might even try to get a tax-exempt status for a decade or two. Since support of this project might help gain some politicians popularity while not many would think it'll work, it looks like an easy solution of a place to live in.

    I'd like some of your thoughts on this idea.

  4. ==General==

    The '''Kapitalist Partiet''' is a political party in eNorway founded on specific principals.

    Chief among these is the [[Trader Principal]]; that men enter into agreements with others in order to exchange value for value. Next is the principal of [[Non-initiation of force]], that in order to trade all exchanges between free men must be voluntary, free of force and/or fraud. These principals draw their legitimacy from the inalienable right of all men to live their own lives for their own sake.

    ==Platform==

    What this should contain?

    ===Economy===

    Reduce Income and Import taxes while increasing the VAT if neccessary.

    ===Defence===

    Seek closer relations with both Scandinavian and EDEN countries; have constant training wars.

    ===Foreign Affairs==

    Try to find new allies whenever possible.

    ==The Party==

    "Capitalist Party" or "Individualist Party"

    ===Leader===

    I could do it.

    ===Deputy Leader===

    ===Representation in Congress===

    One from each region we have people in. At least.

    That should clear something up ;)

  5. Have you just seen the Norway's recent military campaign? They have attacked Finland and Russia. I think they are using the moment of Russia's war against USA to their advantage and are up to taking over the Eastern Russia. There are only two regions hard to take over though: Moscow and Urals, so Norway should take over the rest quite easily. Whatdo you think about it?

  6. The wiki for the Technocratic party that is currently in power doesn't mention much about its ideology.

    They might as well as be the actual technocrats. If that is the case, they want to charge the ones who have the best understanding of the game mechanics in charge. I don't see anything dangerous about it, though.

  7. As far as productivity goes, you can actually make an organization that owns a lot of the companies; you can have 1 of each type of company (grain, food, metal, houses, etc), so that's really nice. One thing we do need is enough work force, but as an owner you dont actually need to work in the place yourself.

    Having one company for each one of us is nice enough though.

    But yeah, I also got a raise today. Some people seem pretty good about giving you raises to keep their workers! :)

    Same here. Should get another one in two days. I am the producer (weapons). Although all the difference there actually is is the sphere you're occupied in. The one can be both a worker, a soldier and a journalist.

    A country doesnt really need to produce all its basic resources, after all :)

    heard anything of export licenses, though? I think those are needed to get the income out of the trade.

×
×
  • Create New...