Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

FrolicsomeQuipster

Regulars
  • Posts

    354
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by FrolicsomeQuipster

  1. That's why I asked it, the act is one done for the enjoyment of it, which if I remember correctly makes it an end in itself. The only conflict that ought to arise on the premises of Hetero VS Homo sex acts should be on aesthetic level. And thanks to artificial insemination we can start to question the morality of heterosexuality on a altruistic level too. The only reason some mystics allow it is because of reproduction, now that is not even necessary anymore why aren't they jumping at the chance to elevate our species to a completely new level of sexual purity?
  2. I have just registered and have not read this whole tread but why is this in ethics instead of esthetics?
×
×
  • Create New...