MRDA

Strner isn't so much about predation as he is about acting in one's own interest - his "might is right" philosophy has similarities to Branden's "no one is coming to the rescue" - basically he's saying don't hide behind empty platitudes but instead fight for your rights, property etc, and the preservation of such! If one passively espouses this right or that without upholding it in practice, they've given a certain legitimacy to those with suspect ideas. As is often said, "the surest way for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing". The area where he does considerably differ from Rand, apart from his (theoretically) cavalier attitude toward initiation of force, is the rejection of normatives such as "man qua man" which he sees every bit as counterproductive as collectivist ideas of God, State, family, race, etc...

Here's another Objectivist angle on the whole issue of Immigration & Terrorism (not one I necessarily agree with...) Ushering in Civilization's Destroyers Possibly the most extreme solution to the problem (although the implications of fully-open immigration he outlines have some sense behind them....

But Sailor, if emotions are non-volitional, how does one gain such control over the arising of one's emotion ? Did you check the actions/mindsets that led to the arising of said emotions?