Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

ramKatori

Regulars
  • Content Count

    71
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About ramKatori

  • Rank
    Junior Member

Previous Fields

  • Country
    Not Specified
  • State (US/Canadian)
    Not Specified
  1. Suppose you are the jury of the Nobel Peace Prize. Which person would you nominate as most contributing to peace among nations in the last few years? I think George Bush.
  2. When one marries the spouse would usually take precedence unless some other explicit declaration exists. If the parents can prove the marriage was false or that the husband is acting in malice as some allege then that is different. I ask myself that if he really acted for money then why not take the recent offer from someone for a million dollars. More about this case is available at this site.
  3. In school they fed me Malthus: population increases in geometric progression and resources increase in arithmetic progression and that is why China and the east is poor. In college it was Marxism. The college library had von Mises and I read it because of Ayn Rand's suggestion. Hated his epistemology. Menger made some sense. His theory of value was almost same as Objectivism. Still I could not see where I could go with his theory. Reisman's book was a brain dump. The only good book was by Henry Hazlitt. I'm still waiting for a good economist.
  4. Anybody know how the recent eminent domain case is doing at the supreme court?
  5. How can a journalist be objective? Does it mean no opinion? Does it mean not putting opinion as fact? Does it mean not slanting the facts and showing only one side of the story?
  6. ramKatori

    Abortion

    Is it gross obscenity to say a parent should decide certain things for a child? If sex and abortions should be an exception, make the case. If 17 year olds should be allowed to decide more than 13 year old I agree. "if the parents don't believe in abortion..." then their decision to force the child to have a child should be legal. Yes I use the word "force" for if the parent and the child agree then why discuss whether parent or child has legal priority. This is a situation where a legal system is being asked to decide whose view should stand by force of law. You say a pro-life view "
  7. ramKatori

    Abortion

    Deciding that the act of conception was irrational, and changing one's mind is a perfectly rational reason to have an abortion. The original act may have been irrational. The old movies -- sudden act of passion. Irrational? yes. (Wonder if Franscisco & Dagny used protection that first time.) Subsequent abortion could still be rational. About a kid who should ask her parents about whether to abort. I disagree with that. If she is too young to decide, she should not be allowed motherhood. The baby must be aborted. Legally parents should decide. Morally, they should decide to abort.
  8. In this example something else applies. We may assume that one means of communication is superior to others. Still, spmeone can use the inferior one effectively.
  9. Saw "The Truman Show" yesterday. Interesting "what if" scenario. Impossible but interesting. Someone listed it as a favorite in a previous post. I think more could be done with the idea. I don't know what could be done. I think a good author would have a way to do something with it.
  10. Won't do your homework. Will help with this hint about looping. (Using Code formatting, like poster above.) Print Year means: LOOP 12 TIME PRINT-A-MONTH END-OF-LOOP[/code] Print Month means: [code] LOOP from 1 to ?? PRINT-WEEK-n UNTIL no-more-weeks/days
  11. Hear! hear! Can this forum be a palce where international objectivists like to come? Let's bring Prodos here... he's an Aussie with spirit. Hear! hear! Let us help Felipe. There are posts with too much quotation. Lazy. Help Felipe formulate a good rule.
  12. I agree that freedom of speech is a necessary condition before a country deserves the rule of law. It is not a sufficient condition. If the democratic will of the people takes me closer to slavery, there will come a time when I will have to disobey the law, even if I the law lets me protest my predicament. Oakes: do you morally condemn Martha Stewart?
  13. There seems to be consensus that certain things are definitely porn (e.g. the "hard core", primarily anatomical, photographs published with the sole intent of sexual arousal. So, at least for such porn, I'd like to go back to the question raised by the original questioner. Is consumption of this type of "hard core" porn immoral? [basic Questions Forum, moderator note: Edited with permission of poster, to remove note about an earlier post that was in violation of Forum Rules. To all members: Use the !REPORT button, rather than the thread itself, to report violations. Burgess Laughin.]
  14. I've found that the search does not like words that are 3 letters or less. So, searching for D. C. Stove will not work, unless you search for the entire text, by putting it within quotations, thus: "D. C. Stove". Ofcourse, this has its downside, so you might simply search for the word "Stove".
  15. Great post BBrown. I'd guess that is it not uncommon in history that someone who starts thinking along a new line also retains many incorrect ideas of his generation. When we finally bring the new line to full intellectual maturity, it is rude (if nothing else) to curse the person who pioneered the new branch for not taking a wider step to the side. Rather we should be thankful, regardless of the size of the step, for it is little forks in the road that lead on to vastly different futures.
×
×
  • Create New...