Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Talk About Defining With Non-essentials

Rate this topic


RadCap

Recommended Posts

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5287945/

This supposedly serious article denigrates the remarkable achievement of man space through redefinition by NON essentials. It is a sneer piece which pretends to be benevolent and *somewhat* cheering of the astronautic achievements.

According to it, man has NEVER 'really' gone into space at all.

Note that the writer is from SETI. That explains alot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of funky headlines, I saw this today on CNN:

Simple Injection Stops Affairs

What would you give for a simple injection that would stop your lover from cheating? A single gene inserted into the brain can change promiscuous male rodents into faithful, monogamous partners.

http://cnn.aimtoday.cnn.com/news/healthmai...re=cheaters0604

It works for rodents, folks - what else need I say?

Regarding the article, it does make one valid point – SpaceShipOne only used 2% of the energy necessary for escape velocity. While this does not make the accomplishment insignificant, we should be realistic about what was achieved Monday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be misunderstanding your point, GC, but I have a different understanding of the article RadCap posted above. The article said that the energy requirements of SpaceShipOne were 4% of those for a regular NASA space shuttle. Using convoluted grammar, the article added that energy required to get SpaceShipOne into space was 2% of that necessary to get a space shuttle into space. I don't think this 2% figure diminishes SpaceShipOne's achievement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The article states that the requirements are “pound for pound” adjusted. In other words, SpaceShipOne has just 2% of the energy needed for it (not the Shuttle) to escape orbit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when will those stupid humans learn that space, science and technology are all constructs of stupid human logic. mwuahahahhahahah :D

Sorry I felt that sarcasm was necessary, because I need to get it out of my system, Ive been around too many skeptics lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...