~Sophia~ Posted January 23, 2008 Report Share Posted January 23, 2008 Has anyone here read anything by him? I am being dared to read Voltaire's Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West and I am wondering what am I getting myself into. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aleph_0 Posted January 23, 2008 Report Share Posted January 23, 2008 Certainly the best way to investigate great literature is on dares and spin-the-bottle. Really, I tend to be open-minded and investigate all sorts of different lit, but that sounds too much like a token bastard of a-culturalism: Having no biases, not even to reason. I have a favorite method of finding great books. I never fail to buy the highest recommendations of my closest friends and people I respect. First, reading something a friend has read is great for discussing a text with someone you respect--which is great for learning as much as possible about the text. Second, good people tend to read good books. By a combination of recommendations and knowing about a few books that I might enjoy, I have piles of books on my to-read list. So unless the person who dared you to read it is someone you particularly respect, I would say to hell with it. There are better things to spend your valuable time on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaszloWalrus Posted January 23, 2008 Report Share Posted January 23, 2008 I'm only read parts of what he's written, but the basic thesis running through what I've read is that "too much" rationality leads to disaster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenure Posted January 23, 2008 Report Share Posted January 23, 2008 Whenever people talk of 'too much rationality' or 'cold, unfeeling logic', as if somehow Reason is some necessary evil, sent to constrict our animal desires and base emotions, I understand that the grain of truth in what they are saying, that grain being 'rationalism' and not 'rationality', and it is true: rationalism leads to disaster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KendallJ Posted January 23, 2008 Report Share Posted January 23, 2008 Whenever people talk of 'too much rationality' or 'cold, unfeeling logic', as if somehow Reason is some necessary evil, sent to constrict our animal desires and base emotions, I understand that the grain of truth in what they are saying, that grain being 'rationalism' and not 'rationality', and it is true: rationalism leads to disaster. What you have there is the mind-body dichotomy in action. I like to call it the "Mr. Spock" syndrome. Of course the basic construct of the argument is a golden mean sort of thinking, that everything, must be in moderation, including reason, and maybe even reality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Sophia~ Posted January 23, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 23, 2008 He is a critic of modern society and from what I have been told some of his identifications are dead on. How does he however go from "there is lots of confusion and ideological disintegration out there" to "the problem is too much rationality"? The fact that someone speaks of freedom does not mean that they understand the concept. Why would he think that reason is the problem and not, for example, simple ignorance? What should we use in reason's place? It looks like I am going to read this thing after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
softwareNerd Posted January 23, 2008 Report Share Posted January 23, 2008 It sounds like a modern version of the Romanticist school. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.