Paul Hsieh Posted July 14, 2008 Report Share Posted July 14, 2008 The following letter appeared in the online edition of the July 13, 2008 Denver Post, with negative references to individualism and Ayn Rand: <http://blogs.denverpost.com/eletters/2008/...ttled-the-west/> or <http://tinyurl.com/6g245h>. Because Ayn Rand's name doesn't frequently appear in our local paper, I took this as an opportunity to set the record straight. Here is the original letter: It wasn't individualism that settled the West Re: "The Cowboy Myth," July 6 Perspective article. There are two problems with Jeffrey Lockwood's support of the Cowboy Myth. First, we are constantly told that it was reality, that cowboys were the essential ingredient in the winning of the West. Truth is, the average cowboy was about as significant as today's parking lot attendant. Perpetuating the Hollywood/dime fiction image of the cowboy propagates the false belief that Ayn Rand individualism was the historical way and will be the best future way to solve our nation's problems. Truth is, the sodbusters were the key, the heroes: risking all, sticking determinedly in their forlorn shacks to raise their crops and banding together to raise their barns, build their schools and defend their homes. The key to our nation's past successes was Americans joining together in common cause, not individualism. Working together will also be the key to our future. Bill Belew Boulder, CO Here is the response I submitted as a website comment. (I don't know when it will show up on the site). Rather than getting mired in the concretes of the sodbusters-vs-cowboys debate, I went straight to fundamental issue he raised of collective-vs-individual, associating Ayn Rand with the positive side. BTW, it only took about 5 minutes to write: America was made by great individuals working under a system which (albeit imperfectly) protected their right to use their rational minds to create value and advance their lives. Where would we be without the likes of Thomas Edison, Westinghouse, and Henry Ford? This was a key insight of Ayn Rand and she deserves tremendous credit for promoting a philosophy that celebrates individual achievement -- the philosophy that underlies the positive and optimistic "can do" American sense of life. Of course individuals can and should band together voluntarily when it suits their purposes. I have no problem with "working together" with others for mutual benefit as a voluntary arrangement, as many did in the Old West. However, this notion is too-often corrupted into a vicious morality which preaches that the collective should take precedence over the individual, that individuals should be coerced to help one other, and that therefore we need massive government intrusions into the economy (such as "universal health care") to automatically provide for everyone's needs at taxpayer expense. This approach will destroy the sorts of individuals who made America great, and will eventually destroy America. We need to celebrate and support the individuals who embody the American spirit and work-ethic, not punish them. Paul Hsieh Sedalia, CO I also submitted a shortened version as an LTE. I don't know if it will appear in print, but my primary purpose was to let the editors to know that the pro-individual point of view is still alive and well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grames Posted July 14, 2008 Report Share Posted July 14, 2008 How are the sodbusters not also individuals? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fletch Posted July 14, 2008 Report Share Posted July 14, 2008 How are the sodbusters not also individuals? I am sure most were. I suspect the person in the original letter wished only to discredit Ayn Rand and individualism, and used a poor analogy. The fact that sodbusters might work together ocasionally to achieve common goals does not invalidate individualism, or even begin to suggest that it was collectivism that made America great--which is the point the original letter was trying to make. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian0918 Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 (edited) I think your reply was well-written - pithy, not too preachy, in the tone of "a fellow American" to whom people can relate. Edited July 23, 2008 by brian0918 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllMenAreIslands Posted November 28, 2008 Report Share Posted November 28, 2008 I liked the response very much! I like how you repeated the words chosen by the original letter writer ("working together") adding in the key word "voluntarily" that he'd left out. Excellent response. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.