Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Romance and evolution.

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

The way I see it, man being the mover and woman being the moved are understood strictly in a romantic context. The mover gives to the moved. In a bioevolutionary context, however, women are the movers and men the moved. The mover takes from the moved.

Where the goal of any bioevolutionary context is to create new life existentially, the goal of any romantic context is the creation of new life intellectually.

There is a perfectly good explanation for this and it has to do with the fact that the mind is adapted not only for flourishing in an individual manner, but also to accomidate the possibility of new children.

Our minds grow from sex, in a very certain manner that involves our readiness to have children. It becomes in our interest to have children because the ways we become happy change.

This does not mean that it's unromantic not to have children. It does, however, mean that children do not kill romance. Not if the romance is genuine and so are the partners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...