D'kian Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 The recent thread(s) featuring a so-called "Christian Objectivist" made me think: what other self-contradictory descriptions or statements can I come up with? Someone already propposed "Laissez-faire Communist." Here are a few: Fat-free doughnut An exciting soccer (or baseball) game Non-violent boxer Well-meaning Altruist Industrial-scale green energy Fair tax Positive government bailout of (insert industry name here) Efficient bureaucrat Reason-free Objectivims (or Christian Objectivism) Rational faith Superbowl winner (pick one: Saints, Vikings, Falcons, Texans, Eagles) That's it for now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zip Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 Temporary Government Program Innate knowledge Collectivist Individual God given ability/skill - God given anything actually Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matus1976 Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 You can't be sure of anything (how can you be sure you can't be sure?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khaight Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 Objectivist intellectual. (Kidding, kidding...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'kian Posted November 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 Harmful CO2 emissions User-friendly tax code Pro-Man Altruism Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mensch Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 Good grief Violent love Atheist's belief Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randroid Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 Modern art Social justice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devils_Advocate Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 Fair Tax Anarchist Communist (?) Anarchist Capitalist Good in theory, bad in practice (This reeks of more Kantianism then any other catch phrase I've ever heard) Benevolent Dictator Government Efficency Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'kian Posted November 22, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 Dehydrated water (that's an old joke by Steve Wright: "I bought instant water. I don't know what to add." Oh, well). Back on topic: Group Rights (any group) Animal rights Peace Protesters (this works on many levels) Jews for Jesus (really!) Enlightened Religion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MajorTom Posted November 22, 2008 Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 Jumbo Shrimp Clean Coal Partial Fractions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuringAI Posted November 22, 2008 Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 Partial Fractions How is 'Partial Fractions' a contradiction? It sounds more like The Department of Redundancy Department to me. I've got a good one: Unidentified Flying Object. (If you can detect it to the point where you know it's flying it's not really unidentified, now is it?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myself Posted November 22, 2008 Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 Unidentified Flying Object. (If you can detect it to the point where you know it's flying it's not really unidentified, now is it?) No, then it would be a Detected Flying Object, or even Photographed Flying Object. If you don't know what it is you're looking at, that pretty much means it's Unidentified. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RationalBiker Posted November 22, 2008 Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 I'm from the government, I'm here to help. Suppose there were no hypotheticals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenure Posted November 22, 2008 Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 (edited) Material consciousness (bloody hell, I spent so long in my Seminar trying to explain why consciousness cannot be anything other than, well, consciousness of something, that it's a state of mind and not a state of matter and... argh... some people just do not get axioms, "Oh, like the idea that 'existence' isn't a property. Well, you know Rory, some people hold that 'existence' is just a contingent property, that things don't 'have' to exist to be"....) Edited November 22, 2008 by Tenure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
musenji Posted November 23, 2008 Report Share Posted November 23, 2008 Rory, I would say that all consciousness exists physically in the interactions of brain pieces/parts. It's not convenient to refer to it that way because we're nowhere NEAR being able to pinpoint exactly what physical interaction equals, say, the concept "tree", but the truth remains that it has to in SOME form exist physically, else it could not be real. Meanwhile: Pacifist Taxman. (I recently thought of asking some pacifist friends, "how do you justify taxation by force, and the fact that the police protect you? You're just letting someone else do the work that you consider 'sin'. What's more, you're counting on them to do it. So what's the difference in principle?") Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01503 Posted November 23, 2008 Report Share Posted November 23, 2008 (I recently thought of asking some pacifist friends, "how do you justify taxation by force, and the fact that the police protect you? You're just letting someone else do the work that you consider 'sin'. What's more, you're counting on them to do it. So what's the difference in principle?") Do that, and post it on here. Preferably in a different thread, of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.