RationalEgoistSG Posted July 4, 2004 Report Share Posted July 4, 2004 Before seeing Spiderman 2 last night I saw a number of previews. One movie stood out as extremely interesting and visually spectactular: Sky Captain and The World of Tomorrow. The synopsis: In 1930's Manhattan, reporter Polly Perkins (Gwyneth Paltrow) has noted the disappearances of many of the world's most famous scientists. After the city falls under attack of giant flying robots, she decides to team up with her old flame/aviation officer Joseph "Sky Captain" Sullivan (Jude Law) and fly to Nepal in search of Dr. Totenkopf, whose plan is to destroy the world. What really got me interested in the trailer at the movie was the astounding visuals of it. Apparently the entire movie was made in front of a blue screen, even scenes in normal-looking settings! Here's an article about this fact: http://voicefilms.typepad.com/voicefilms/2...tain_and_1.html The movie is said to be made in retro comic book fashion, and the the old trailer reflects this pretty well. The new trailer unfortunately has taken out the corny comic book style, so I suggest checking the old one out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Areactor Posted July 4, 2004 Report Share Posted July 4, 2004 I'm actually interested. I like pulp noir stories and movies and thats what this looks like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles T. Posted July 4, 2004 Report Share Posted July 4, 2004 That looks like it could be a neat movie. On a sidenote, the musical theme that plays during the older trailer has been used in *at least* four other films. The first time I heard it, and it is probably best known from this, was as the theme to Stargate. I wonder why they keep using the same music over and over for different films. Kind of strange. At least it's good music. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elle Posted July 4, 2004 Report Share Posted July 4, 2004 Speaking of interesting movie trailers that look promising, has anyone else seen the trailer for The Aviator. It's about Howard Hughes and is starring Leonardo DiCaprio. It looks pretty good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RationalEgoistSG Posted July 4, 2004 Author Report Share Posted July 4, 2004 Yes I have Elle, it looked pretty interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed from OC Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 Yes I have Elle, it looked pretty interesting. I'm looking forward to it, but casting DiCaprio as Hughes could be bad. He just looks like such a young kid, while Hughes, in my mind, should look like someone in his late 30s -- very clearly a man in his prime, not some pretty-boy. DiCaprio is a good actor, at times -- see "Catch Me If You Can" -- so I'll give him a chance. Maybe he'll do well here, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elle Posted July 5, 2004 Report Share Posted July 5, 2004 I'm looking forward to it, but casting DiCaprio as Hughes could be bad. He just looks like such a young kid, while Hughes, in my mind, should look like someone in his late 30s -- very clearly a man in his prime, not some pretty-boy. DiCaprio is a good actor, at times -- see "Catch Me If You Can" -- so I'll give him a chance. Maybe he'll do well here, too. I think DiCaprio has been moving towards better and better films, and away from his young pretty-boy image (e.g. Romeo & Juliet, Titantic, etc.) His acting in Gangs of New York was impressive, although the movie on the whole lagged. I haven't seen Catch Me If You Can, I should. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montesquieu Posted July 6, 2004 Report Share Posted July 6, 2004 I'm surprised so many found the trailers for this movie so intrigueing, I think it looks awful. One should be very wary of any script that would attract Gwyneth Paltrow, Angelina Jolie, and Jude Law based on who they are outside of movies and what they have made in the past (I'm thinking specifically of one of the worst films I've ever seen, "The Talented Mr. Ripley") All three are also on the slide with the bombs beginning to rack up, I would stay away from this movie, which looks entirely cartoonish and has no discernable plot, at least going by trailers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Betsy Posted July 6, 2004 Report Share Posted July 6, 2004 I'm surprised so many found the trailers for this movie so intrigueing, I think it looks awful. One should be very wary of any script that would attract Gwyneth Paltrow, Angelina Jolie, and Jude Law based on who they are outside of movies and what they have made in the past (I'm thinking specifically of one of the worst films I've ever seen, "The Talented Mr. Ripley") Despite their off-screen antics, all three are physically attractive people and actors who have and can convincingly portray heroes. I would stay away from this movie, which looks entirely cartoonish and has no discernable plot, at least going by trailers.Here's the write-up from IMDB: In 1930's Manhattan, reporter Polly Perkins (Gwyneth Paltrow) has noted the disappearances of many of the world's most famous scientists. After the city falls under attack of giant flying robots, she decides to team up with her old flame/aviation officer Joseph "Sky Captain" Sullivan (Jude Law) and fly to Nepal in search of Dr. Totenkopf, whose plan is to destroy the world. It could be a dud, but there are some promising elements: 1930's Manhattan (Art Deco stylization), a Nazi-like villian ("Totenkopf" means "dead head" in German), and a career woman in search of disappearing scientists (sounds familiar). There is only one person, Kerry Conran, listed as both the writer and director which tends to be a very good sign, esthetically. The fact that Conran has no other credits, yet is being trusted with a big budget film, is strange. It might be a pseudonym for a writer and director who does not want his real name associated with the film. I'm hoping for the best, but we'll see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottkursk Posted July 6, 2004 Report Share Posted July 6, 2004 I'm looking forward to it, but casting DiCaprio as Hughes could be bad. He just looks like such a young kid, while Hughes, in my mind, should look like someone in his late 30s -- very clearly a man in his prime, not some pretty-boy. DiCaprio is a good actor, at times -- see "Catch Me If You Can" -- so I'll give him a chance. Maybe he'll do well here, too. Actually I think DiCaprio is 30, he just deoesn't show it. But I agree, Hughes did look much older. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPowersDC Posted July 6, 2004 Report Share Posted July 6, 2004 On a sidenote, the musical theme that plays during the older trailer has been used in *at least* four other films. The first time I heard it, and it is probably best known from this, was as the theme to Stargate. I wonder why they keep using the same music over and over for different films. Kind of strange. This happens a lot. Often, music from an older movie by the same studio will be used in the trailer, or even symphonic concert music that was never part of a movie score. The reason is that the trailers are sometimes made even before editing is completed (which is why you'll occassionally see a scene in a trailer that isn't even in the finished film). The addition of the score into the soundtrack is usually the very last step before the film is sent off for duplication/distribution. When a trailer is made, sometimes the score hasn't even been composed yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Currence Posted July 6, 2004 Report Share Posted July 6, 2004 I think I saw the preview for this movie at The Day After Tomorrow, and if I remembered that correctly, it was the best part of the whole two hour experience. As for themes in trailers and so forth: I don't know if anyone noticed, but the trailer music for the second Lord of the Rings movie (or possibly the third, I'm not quite sure) was the theme music for the movie Requiem for a Dream, directed by Darren Aronofsky. The music was performed by the Kronos Quartet and written by Clint Mansell (of Pop Will Eat Itself fame), for anyone who is interested. It is a simple but powerful theme, and very fitting for such a depressing but well-crafted movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elle Posted July 6, 2004 Report Share Posted July 6, 2004 I think I saw the preview for this movie at The Day After Tomorrow, and if I remembered that correctly, it was the best part of the whole two hour experience. Haha, my thoughts exactly! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RationalBiker Posted July 7, 2004 Report Share Posted July 7, 2004 I think DiCaprio has been moving towards better and better films, I think DiCaprio's best movie so far was What's Eating Gilbert Grape? He plays Gilbert's (Johnny Depp) younger retarded brother Arnie and his acting is excellent. I also liked Depp in that movie too. If you haven't seen the movie, Depp's character is struggling with having to give up any thought of having a life because he has to take care of his retarded younger brother and his mom who weighs like 600 lbs. and is home-bound. When he does start to have something of a life on the side, of course things go wrong with his family to suck him back in. Despite the prevalent altruistic theme, there appears to be light at the end of the tunnel for his character. I would highly recommend this to anyone who hasn't seen it. And Catch Me If You Can is good as well. VES PS: Yes, I want to see Sky Captain as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottkursk Posted July 7, 2004 Report Share Posted July 7, 2004 I saw an article on slashdot.org that the director was a fan of movies like Rocket Man. Rocket man for those unfamiliar is a great movie with a great sense of life, classic figures of heroism, right verses wrong, etc. That and Air Boy comics which I used to collect. He worked years in his basement producing a few minutes of a very stylistic film on an ancient computer. He did it for the love of it. He kept it to himself ala Dominique's statue until a family member basically forced him to show his 6 minute flick to a producer friend. The producer saw that this was a very different film and ran with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidV Posted September 19, 2004 Report Share Posted September 19, 2004 The gulf between motion picture technology, such as computer-generated imagery (CGI), and Hollywood's ideas is widening and it is abundantly clear in Kerry Conran's Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. http://www.boxofficemojo.com/reviews/?id=skycaptain.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Betsy Posted September 19, 2004 Report Share Posted September 19, 2004 http://www.boxofficemojo.com/reviews/?id=skycaptain.htm The reviewer, Scott Holleran, is a friend of mine, but we almost never agree about movies. Interestingly, over half of Box Office Mojo's readers gave Sky Captain an "A". I'm going tomorrow and I hope to really like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew Posted September 19, 2004 Report Share Posted September 19, 2004 There is only one person, Kerry Conran, listed as both the writer and director which tends to be a very good sign, esthetically. The fact that Conran has no other credits, yet is being trusted with a big budget film, is strange. It might be a pseudonym for a writer and director who does not want his real name associated with the film. Check out this article about Kerry Conran from Apple: http://www.apple.com/pro/video/conran/index.html The man seems to be pretty innovative with using relatively common, yet still expensive and complicated, software. I agree with his prediction that more and more movies, including ones like this that seeming look grand, will be made by "no names" like him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeus Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 I saw it on Friday. It looks nice, and the beautiful Angelina Jolie made an impression, and that's about all I'm prepared to say. "Cellular", however, was quite good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CICEROSC Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 I saw it Friday night, and liked it well enough, but if I had to rate it in comparison with "Starship Troopers" (another pseudo-comic-book movie) I would say the pace and enthusiasm of Starship Troopers was much better. No other commentary from those who've seen it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeus Posted September 20, 2004 Report Share Posted September 20, 2004 I saw it Friday night, and liked it well enough, but if I had to rate it in comparison with "Starship Troopers" (another pseudo-comic-book movie) I would say the pace and enthusiasm of Starship Troopers was much better. No other commentary from those who've seen it? There's a longer review on NoumenalSelf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadCap Posted September 23, 2004 Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 Ive not been able to see this movie yet (for a number of reasons). But I thought others were anticipating this film. So Im surprised no one has commented on it yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bowzer Posted September 23, 2004 Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 (edited) Ive not been able to see this movie yet (for a number of reasons). But I thought others were anticipating this film. So Im surprised no one has commented on it yet. This thread should probably have been moved to this forum. My fault. Done. - GC Edited September 24, 2004 by GreedyCapitalist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen_speicher Posted September 23, 2004 Report Share Posted September 23, 2004 Ive not been able to see this movie yet (for a number of reasons). But I thought others were anticipating this film. So Im surprised no one has commented on it yet. I was rather disappointed. The technique itself was exquisite, a perfect approach to creating the world in Atlas Shrugged. Digital stylization. But the story and the characterizations did not match up to the technique, though at times it approached it. I was expecting, or, perhaps, hoping, for something more, a whole package. It was not there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.