MoralParadise Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 What does it mean? I think it is an example of Gail not being able to control someone, and being frustrated. Yet, I want to understand what Rand is implying by the part: "My darling, anything you wish, anything I am, anything I can ever be . .. That's what i want to offer you not the things I'll get for you, but the thing in me that will make me able to get them. That thing a man can't renounce it but I want to renounce it so that it will be yours so that it will be in your service only for you" Here is the whole quote. Gail Wynand was twenty when he fell in love. He had known everything there was to know about sex since the age of thirteen He had had many girls. He never spoke of love, created no romantic illusion and treated the whole matter as a simple animal transaction; but at this he was an expert and women could tell it, just by looking at him. The girl with whom he fell in love had an exquisite beauty, a beauty to be worshiped, not desired. She was fragile and silent. Her face told of the lovely mysteries within her, left unexpressed. She became Gail Wynanand's mistress. He allowed himself the weakness of being happy. He would have married her at once had she mentioned it. But they said little to each other. He felt that everything was understood between them. One evening he spoke. Sitting at her feet, his face raised to her, he allowed his soul to be heard. "My darling, anything you wish, anything I am, anything I can ever be . .. That's what i want to offer you not the things I'll get for you, but the thing in me that will make me able to get them. That thing a man can't renounce it but I want to renounce it so that it will be yours so that it will be in your service only for you: The girl smiled and asked: "Do you think I'm prettier than Maggie Kelly?" He got up. He said nothing and walked out of the house. he never saw that girl again. Gail Wynand, who prided himself never needing a lesson twice, did not fall in love again in the years that followed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoralParadise Posted August 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 (edited) Oh come on - 40 views and no one read the Fountainhead? Edited August 22, 2009 by MoralParadise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve D'Ippolito Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Well, it's not that Gail Wynand was annoyed because he could not control her. He was uspet because the woman he thought he loved turned out to be lights are on but nobody's home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grames Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 What does it mean? I think it is an example of Gail not being able to control someone, and being frustrated. Yet, I want to understand what Rand is implying by the part: It is part of setting the pattern for all of his future human interactions until he meets Dominique and Roark. He doesn't believe anyone is what they look to be or claim to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas M. Miovas Jr. Posted August 22, 2009 Report Share Posted August 22, 2009 Wynand dumped her because she was a second-hander -- all she wanted to do after being so praised by Gail was to compare herself to someone else, and Wynand just thought she wasn't worthwhile any longer based on those premises. Wynand was a self-made man and didn't compare himself or his values to others, and he expected the same from those he loved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoralParadise Posted August 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Wynand's philosophy seems to be formed in this passage. He assumes that people are generally worthless and that he must therefore gain power over them...and subsequently allow them to control him. It's ironic how he resents the second handerism in his would be girlfriend, yet resorts to a darker form of it through pandering to the masses in an opposite form of Roark. The attitude he adopts is key to his future actions in the novel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas M. Miovas Jr. Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 It's ironic how he resents the second handerism in his would be girlfriend, yet resorts to a darker form of it through pandering to the masses in an opposite form of Roark. But Wynand doesn't realize that power lust is a form of second-handedness; and he doesn't realize he lets people in general mean too much to him, which is also a form of second-handedness. After reading the story, you can realize that his great mistake was in accepting that mankind was nothing but second-handers, leading him to become one, but he doesn't realize that until much later in his life. It's not that the right type of people shouldn't mean anything to you, but realizing that others make of their lives what they will -- perhaps without much thought at all -- but you don't have to follow the herd in your own choices, so long as you are a free man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.