Liberals Do Not Believe in Checks and Balances

[MoralParadise]

Whether it be market checks and balances or checks and balances in the governments, altruist powered liberals like Obama fundamentally do not understand the concept of an economy. In an economy, men exchange goods and services. Wealth is created by bringing new goods and services to the market financed by savings and production. In order to make more wealth available, the government needs to step away and allow honest bartering to happen. If that can't happen, how can a government granted monopoly solve the problem by demanding tax payers purchase its products (insurance and care)? How could this possibly benefit the economy? More benefit could be derived from legally prosecuting the companies that produce cancer causing products like aspartame which turns into formaldehyde at body temperature. Instead we have elected to further empower the queen of medicine (American Medical Society) to further regulate and prosecute our own doctors for not telling their patients that they must die within x years and are not allowed to pursue any other avenues.

Moral of the story: Those who live by this voracious dogma of growing the economy under government takeover of industry will ultimately die by its effects, though not at the expense of the average disillusioned tax paying realist who is ten mental echelons above Obama the neurotic who is either insane or afraid of blackmail. IT's too bad the Jesuits run the world and enforce their insidious altruist facade on our leaders who fear their own independence more than any illness stricken potential beneficiary of this monopolizing 1200 page bill.

Edited March 1, 2010 by MoralParadise