Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Is Islamophobia sweeping the US?

Rate this topic


2046

Recommended Posts

A proposal to build a US$100 million Islamic center two blocks from Ground Zero has sparked controversy in the US. While opponents say they are not against Islam, protests against similar mosques far from Ground Zero has raised fears that intolerance toward American Muslims is growing. One church plans to burn the Koran. 20% of Americans and 46% of Republicans believe Barack Obama is Muslim. A taxi driver in New York City was attacked after telling his passenger that he is Muslim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One could only hope that more Americans become aware of the great threat Islam poses to our way of life. Symbolic gestures like burning books, or physical assaults on peaceful believers are not useful or proper responses, of course -- but given Islam's explicitly stated goals and actions, the so-far pathetic resistance to them from the West and the ultimate outcome should these not be reversed, how is fear not a rational response?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One could only hope that more Americans become aware of the great threat Islam poses to our way of life. Symbolic gestures like burning books, or physical assaults on peaceful believers are not useful or proper responses, of course -- but given Islam's explicitly stated goals and actions, the so-far pathetic resistance to them from the West and the ultimate outcome should these not be reversed, how is fear not a rational response?

I agree. All religions should be feared, but most modern religions have been tempered by reason. Islam has no such temperment. Its integration of state and religion is complete and total and inseparable. It is like asking someone during the Inquisition, "are you afraid of Christianity?"

Edited by A is A
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Islamophobia" is here used as an anti-concept. A fear can be rational or irrational, i.e., it can have grounds in reality or not. The purpose of the word islamophobia in this context is to make it seem impossible to be afraid of Islam and the islamization of the West on rational grounds. But the fact is that there are rational grounds to be afraid of Islam and the islamization of the West. Islam, in its essence, is a totalitarian religion. Islam means submission for a reason. It is about submitting yourself to God every day and in every moment of your life. It is incompatible with freedom at its very root. I agree with Kyle Haight. One can only hope that more people in the West in general and in America in particular read about Islam and become familiar with the enemy. One can also only hope that the West in general and America in particular grows some balls and starts to offer a proper response to the threat, instead of the current continuation of decades of pragmatic, guilt-ridden and suicidal appeasement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of general curiosity, how many of you have read the Quran, Hadith, and Sira? and by which authors? (I mean all 3 not just one of them). Robert Spencer's literary works don't count, that should be obvious, but the more I discuss this issue and topics related to it, the less I am willing to take certain things for granted.

Edited by CapitalistSwine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have read many, many, many quotes from the Koran and the Hadith. I have read one book by Robert Spencer (I think it was The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam). Everything else I know about Islam comes from reading articles about it on the Internet. I do not see any justification for excluding Robert Spencer's writing on the subject. I do not think one has to read all of the Koran (or the Hadith) to know what Islam is all about, just like one does not have to read the entire Bible to know what Christianity is all about. All you have to do is to read enough to grasp the essence. And that is not that hard. There is no reason to be concrete-bound when it comes to Islam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think one has to read all of the Koran (or the Hadith) to know what Islam is all about, just like one does not have to read the entire Bible to know what Christianity is all about.

My point in asking if anyone here has read all 3, and Robert Spencer distorts the religion to quite a degree (I had borrowed his main book "infidels guide" for a time) which is why I said his comments don't count, is because the Quran is not in context like other religious writings, the Hadith and Sira together provide the context. You simply cannot rely on simple quotes (which could have been from any quranic authors, which in itself is enough to worry about its legitimacy) or on standard reading practices to "get" what the overall religious texts are saying, especially since it is written in the present tense.

And that is not that hard.

It apparently is.

There is no reason to be concrete-bound when it comes to Islam.

I would agree.

Edited by CapitalistSwine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is america heading towards Islamaphobia? I am not entirely sure, I have heard it said, with no evidence provided, that Islamaphobia exists sommewhat in europe. However this is mostly among right-wing groups (in the europeon and american senses). In america we have not gotten to the point where a television show can bash Islam without having their epsiode taken down the next day. After that, right wing American thinkers and pundits tend to make false distinctions between Islam and Militant, Fundementalists, or Radical Islam.

Most religous/multiculturalist liberals have been trying to stop "islamaphobia" (the awareness that Islam is a false set of ideas, and that its followers are dagnerous).

Even though in europe there is tolerance of islam and the backwards ways of islam, the populace seems to be getting rowdier and rowdier about this stuff. Look up a video on youtube about the English Defence League. Sadly these people seem mostly to be morons and will most likely create a totalitarian state, and not solvve any problems.

However, this becomes interesting when you consider Militant Atheists, most of whome are statists. The for horsement seem to all be very much against Islam, although I am not sure if the less popular two have said anything as inlfamatory as Hitchens or Dawkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of curiosity, are you a Moslem, CapitalistSwine? It seems like all you do here is defend Islam.

No I am not. I do not care for Islam in any degree and I think the philosophy/religion is espouses is disgusting and barbaric. I think you missed the golden eggs in my comments elsewhere on this forum that clarified that my disagreements here are not on the fundamental nature of Islam but rather on inaccuracies regarding specifics. Also, I would like you to know that my comments on this forum are not necessarily representative of my writings elsewhere.

Edited by CapitalistSwine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I found the criticism of concept section of the wikipedia entry on Islamaphobia to be interesting:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamophobia

@dadman you have to log in to view whatever you linked. Post the youtube of it/what have you and I will watch it.

Edited by CapitalistSwine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it ironic that the people who complain about Islamophobia are the ones that fear Muslims the most?

"OMG, we can't burn the Koran because it might incite violence!"

"Don't depict Muhammad in a cartoon. It will make Muslims angry!"

The whole argument that we should avoid offending moderate Muslims because they might join the radicals is a non sequitur argument. After all, a person who would kill you for burning a book or drawing a cartoon isn't peaceful to begin with.

I think the proper response to people who accuse you of being Islamophobic is, "If it's irrational to fear Islam, then why are YOU so afraid of offending its followers?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Symbolic gestures like burning books, or physical assaults on peaceful believers are not useful or proper responses, of course --

I used to think the same regarding burning the Koran but now, after the reaction to the mere threat of burning a Koran, I'm not so sure. What better way to expose the anti-free speech nature of Islam? Book burning is historically an act of censorship, which brings a level of irony to such demonstrations that "Everybody Draw Mohammad Day" could not hope to acheive.

Edited by FeatherFall
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to think the same regarding burning the Koran but now, after the reaction to the mere threat of burning a Koran, I'm not so sure. What better way to expose the anti-free speech nature of Islam?

I think the real purpose of such demonstrations should be to illustrate the double-standard that the Islamic totalitarians are working to establish -- the idea that Muslims and Islamic symbols must be treated differently. Perhaps a 3-way book burning: Atlas Shrugged, the Bible and the Koran. Do them in that order, and hammer on the point that one should be equally offended (or not) at each case. Only burning the Koran allows people to blur the issue by talking about 'offensiveness'; it would be harder to carry out that evasion if the burner is also burning a book that he himself finds profoundly valuable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...