Eiuol Posted January 28, 2011 Report Share Posted January 28, 2011 For most of us though, we're not genius artists, even if we were we might not necessary hold those matters as such high values, or we might have other values to weigh up before making a decision like that (Roark was basically aloof from everything else - no family etc). This entirely misses the point. The reason you're saying this is the same sort of reason why some people take Roark to be a person one should emulate in behavior and values. It's like suggesting no one is perfect, therefore, none of us can expect to be as good as Roark and have as much self-esteem. The other angle of that is saying that BECAUSE Roark is perfect, you should emulate him in order to be as good as him. Rand's characters aren't really "theoretical extremes", her characters support points because they ARE realistic. You may think "extreme" only because there are so few people like Roark; he's an individual, that's why he appears to be extreme. Not because he has crazy beliefs, but because he acts in his full self-interest in order to promote his unique values. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyco Posted January 28, 2011 Report Share Posted January 28, 2011 That Roark has unique values was my point. His unique values of course stem form his identity: genius architect. Most people are not in an equivalent position. I'm pretty sure I got the point of the novel. Roark's actions are logical however his identity and circumstances are unusual, which is what makes him an 'extreme' case. Fiction pushes things to extremes to make more clearly defined points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DancingBear Posted January 28, 2011 Report Share Posted January 28, 2011 No other philosopher as far as I know uses fiction to delineate "official" philosophy. Don't forget about "Republic" by Plato as well as the numerous Existential fictions: "The Stranger" by Camus; "No Exit" by Sartre. To that point, "Art is a selective re-creation of reality according to an artist's metaphysical value judgments." -Ayn Rand, "Art and Cognition", The Romantic Manifesto, p. 45. So really any art represents a philosophy, implicit or explicit. Sorry for the tangent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.