CapitalistSwine Posted February 27, 2011 Report Share Posted February 27, 2011 Up until today Libya was on the United Nations Human Rights Council. Does that surprise anyone? The UN is a bad expensive joke. http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/02/26/rex-murphy-un-offers-a-tyrants-last-refuge/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Wolf Posted February 27, 2011 Report Share Posted February 27, 2011 So... what has United Nations done to sanction human rights again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapitalistSwine Posted February 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2011 (edited) So... what has United Nations done to sanction human rights again? Write very strong-worded letters to dictators telling them to play nice. As you can see, apparently some of these letters were signed by dictators as well. Edited February 27, 2011 by CapitalistSwine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'kian Posted February 27, 2011 Report Share Posted February 27, 2011 Write very strong-worded letters to dictators telling them to play nice. You wish! They wrote mildly-worded letters. Dante 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zip Posted February 27, 2011 Report Share Posted February 27, 2011 You can't spell unethical without the UN... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximus Posted February 28, 2011 Report Share Posted February 28, 2011 The UN is just a den of thieves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wrath Posted March 1, 2011 Report Share Posted March 1, 2011 Amazing that the only comments on this forum about the ongoing Arab Revolutions are cliche conservative talking points about the UN. Not that they're inaccurate, but can't you people come up with something more substantive to say about a popular movement that could wind up modernizing large swaths of the Muslim world? This is why I rarely post here anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Wolf Posted March 1, 2011 Report Share Posted March 1, 2011 Uh.. what? You might want to look around, dude.. I saw about two just reading the "recently updated topics" on the forum index for each page. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapitalistSwine Posted March 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2011 Amazing that the only comments on this forum about the ongoing Arab Revolutions are cliche conservative talking points about the UN. Not that they're inaccurate, but can't you people come up with something more substantive to say about a popular movement that could wind up modernizing large swaths of the Muslim world? This is why I rarely post here anymore. My focus on posting this was not even really related to what has been going on in that region but rather simply about the U.N. This recent event has made a perfect point in that respect. It would help if there was a better thread concerning the actual regional revolution. So far I haven't seen one other than that one that kind of diverted from the main discussion so I haven't really put much input here on the forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wrath Posted March 1, 2011 Report Share Posted March 1, 2011 That wasn't a swipe at any particular poster. Just amazement at the apparent failure of this forum, as a whole, to even have a serious, ongoing conversation about these events. I mean, I certainly haven't done a better job at starting a thread than anyone else, but I don't post here that much anymore. Just seems like at least one of the regulars would have picked this up and run with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanaka Posted March 1, 2011 Report Share Posted March 1, 2011 (edited) That wasn't a swipe at any particular poster. Just amazement at the apparent failure of this forum, as a whole, to even have a serious, ongoing conversation about these events. I mean, I certainly haven't done a better job at starting a thread than anyone else, but I don't post here that much anymore. Just seems like at least one of the regulars would have picked this up and run with it. There are other threads on this subject. The reason we don't post in them every day is that there's very little to be excited about. Those crowds are far from rational, or in favor of Capitalism (mainly because they have no idea what it is). By the way, you also had something to say about this, in your previous post. You said that "it's a popular movement that could wind up modernizing large swaths of the Muslim world". While attacking the comments in this thread, you were fair enough to admit they are accurate. Allow me to be fair with your take on the subject, and start with something you did right: you didn't commit to actually making a definitive statement about it, you used the word "might". I assume what followed after that 'might' is a projection of your ideology (unless you're just reciting the projection of CNN's ideology). It certainly doesn't reflect any facts I'm aware of. If by "modernize" you are referring to the calls for "social justice", more welfare (that's certainly what Liberals like to call "modern"), or democracy (mainly for the purpose of imposing Islamic morality and politics on the secular minority, through government force), then sure, that's what these people are fighting for. But if you mean freedom on principle, especially economic freedom, or secularism (these are the two things that I would at least like to think still define modern western societies), I have seen no mention of either of them among the protesters' demands. Like I said in one of those secret threads on this, the overthrowing of some of these dictatorships and the subsequent freedom/chaos might allow for a brief window, at least in Egypt (before the Islamists take over through democracy) to introduce those ideas into the debate, and hope enough people embrace them. But as of today, there is no movement to modernize the Muslim world, in the sense I would use the word modern. Edited March 1, 2011 by Tanaka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icosahedron Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 The UN is just a den of thieves. Yup. And get ready for their power grab, under the guise of "globalization". They want to establish the same pecking order as in the "developed" nations, but on a global scale. That makes the pots bigger and the skimming easier to get away with. Sheesh. - ico Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icosahedron Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 That wasn't a swipe at any particular poster. Just amazement at the apparent failure of this forum, as a whole, to even have a serious, ongoing conversation about these events. I mean, I certainly haven't done a better job at starting a thread than anyone else, but I don't post here that much anymore. Just seems like at least one of the regulars would have picked this up and run with it. Somebody got up on the wrong side of bed ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximus Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 Yup. And get ready for their power grab, under the guise of "globalization". They want to establish the same pecking order as in the "developed" nations, but on a global scale. That makes the pots bigger and the skimming easier to get away with. Sheesh. - ico But these are just conservative talking points. Did you get your DNC Talking Points Bulletin today? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximus Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 Amazing that the only comments on this forum about the ongoing Arab Revolutions are cliche conservative talking points about the UN. Not that they're inaccurate, but can't you people come up with something more substantive to say about a popular movement that could wind up modernizing large swaths of the Muslim world? This is why I rarely post here anymore. I'm so sorry. We just aren't your intellectual equals. We be skeered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Wolf Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 (edited) That wasn't a swipe at any particular poster. Just amazement at the apparent failure of this forum, as a whole, to even have a serious, ongoing conversation about these events. I mean, I certainly haven't done a better job at starting a thread than anyone else, but I don't post here that much anymore. Just seems like at least one of the regulars would have picked this up and run with it. It seems like the revolts are happening because the dictators in question aren't muslim -enough- Edited March 2, 2011 by Black Wolf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icosahedron Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 Out of the frying pan, into the fire. Without a consistent philosophy as compass by which to navigate, even the best intentioned will get lost. - ico Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximus Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 Remember the Revolution of 1917... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grames Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 can't you people come up with something more substantive to say about a popular movement that could wind up modernizing large swaths of the Muslim world? In the 1920's and 30's the spread of fascism and communism preceded the Second World War. What we are seeing now is the spread of a militant and aggressive Islam that will precede the next world wide war that will occur in the 2010's or 2020's. Economic conditions provoked the current round of revolutions and thus provided the seeming synchronicity not any kind of secret conspiracy, but that is how the Great Depression played into the spread of fascism also. The current Saudi and Iranian religious propaganda nicely parallels the work of the international Communist party of the previous era. It is not a positive development and we can't do anything about it so there is no point in talking about than to brood over bad news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icosahedron Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 Au contraire, mon frere Grimes: it MAY BE a positive development, long term, if it wakes the honest folk out of their slumber. The world wars were awful, but as they were unavoidable, they did provide an excuse to blow up the fascists -- and to this day, European politicians are wary about being labeled fascist, which is a good thing. People in a fog will wake up when they see some sharp light source, even if the only light sharp enough comes from the headlights of a mac truck bearing down on them at high speed. It may be too late for them so save themselves, and that would be terrible, but they will wake up. The problem I do have with predictions of military doom are that, if it's so predictable, then why don't we just nuke 'em now, while they are still "babies" economically, before they can catch up militarily? That is the natural consequence of assuming that war is inevitable; if it is unavoidable, then put down "Leaves of Grass" and pick up "The Art of War", where Lao Tzu makes clear that one should choose the time and place for battles to one's greatest advantage. - ico Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wrath Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 Good lord, are we watching the same newscasts? The Islamist movement has been, at best, on the sidelines of the revolts in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya. The overwhelming preponderance of statements from the protesters has been about toppling dictatorships and installing government that answers to its people--not the Quran. And I love the dismissal of any potential progress, because of the fact that the protesters haven't been calling for a laissez-faire capitalist economy. You're setting up a very dangerous false dichotomy, where a country is either Singapore or North Korea, with no intermediates. Toppling dictators and installing accountable government is a step in the right direction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grames Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 The world wars were awful, but as they were unavoidable, . . . The problem I do have with predictions of military doom are that, if it's so predictable, then why don't we just nuke 'em now, while they are still "babies" economically, before they can catch up militarily? Answer your own question about the past, then see if there are analog reasons operating in the present. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grames Posted March 2, 2011 Report Share Posted March 2, 2011 Good lord, are we watching the same newscasts? The Islamist movement has been, at best, on the sidelines of the revolts in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya. The overwhelming preponderance of statements from the protesters has been about toppling dictatorships and installing government that answers to its people--not the Quran. If the population of "statements from the protesters" you know of is drawn from watching TV, you are drawing the conclusion you are being manipulated to draw. You're setting up a very dangerous false dichotomy, where a country is either Singapore or North Korea, with no intermediates. Not at all. The initial status was intermediate. If there is movement and not just a change of faces then it indeed will be better or worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanaka Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 (edited) Good lord, are we watching the same newscasts? Probably not, judging from your description of what the protesters are "saying". You're hearing the voices whatever you're watching selected for you to hear. If you want reality, you should probably look for more diverse sources. Try some of the Israeli media, they're less likely to only tell you what you want to hear. And I love the dismissal of any potential progress, because of the fact that the protesters haven't been calling for a laissez-faire capitalist economy. I'd love to see you quote someone in this thread who made that argument. The actual point being made is that most of those protesters are fighting for less of a capitalist economy than what they have today, and less of a secular government than the ones they have today. That's what's being pointed out to you, not that they're not Objectivists. You're setting up a very dangerous false dichotomy, where a country is either Singapore or North Korea Let's take Bahrain for instance. Do you think a revolution will bring it closer to Singapore, or further? Edited March 3, 2011 by Tanaka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wrath Posted March 3, 2011 Report Share Posted March 3, 2011 (edited) True, the Israeli media isn't going to tell me what I want to hear. But do you seriously think that the Israeli media in this instance is going to be objective? The Israelis have a much deeper interest in these events than any western country, and it is in their interests to paint the movement as Islamist, in order to prompt the major players to forestall any Islamist movements. Even so, I opened the Jerusalem Times just now and the following 2 articles were the first ones to jump out at me, as being about the uprisings: http://blogs.jpost.com/content/revolution-apparently-order-day http://blogs.jpost.com/content/how-egypt-more-libya-will-affect-middle-east Though they both mention the Muslim Brotherhood's posturing, neither paints this as a movement that is primarily Islamist in nature, and the first one even seems cautiously optimistic about the ultimate effect on the region. I've never claimed anywhere that this is going to result in full democratization or modernization. I'll wait for history to decide. But I do think there is reason to hope that the Middle East is taking an important step in the direction of modernization. And while people in here are decrying my statement that the uprising is not primarily Islamist, no one is offering me any evidence that it is--or that it is, as you just said, "less secular and capitalistic". And I haven't followed Bahrain that closely. I know the Sunnis are protesting against Shi'a rule, so there may be more of a religious tint to that one. But the 3 major revolutions (Tunisia, Egypt, Libya) do not, so far, seem to have taken on an Islamist fervor. Edited March 3, 2011 by The Wrath Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.