samr Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 Does objectivism have a concept similar to the concept of logical fallacies? (I ask because objectivism views cognition as being done by the mind, so I guess it should focus more on _metnal_ mistakes (evasion being one) and not "logical" ones). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObjectivistMathematician Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 Well, Ayn Rand coined the fallacy of stolen concept. But yes, Objectivists would recognize other regular logical fallacies (ad hominem, post hoc ergo propter hoc, appeal to emotion, etc.). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vox Rationis Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 Does objectivism have a concept similar to the concept of logical fallacies? (I ask because objectivism views cognition as being done by the mind, so I guess it should focus more on _metnal_ mistakes (evasion being one) and not "logical" ones). Logical mistakes are mental mistakes. Logic is simply the study of the rules of the processes of reason. When someone commits a logical fallacy, he is using the forms of reason to make an arbitrary assertion and is thus abandoning rationality. The logical fallacies which Ayn Rand identified are all fallacies of concept formation. The reason she, rather than someone else, was able to identify these fallacies first is because she was the first to formulate a correct theory of concept formation. I have copied a list of these from the Objectivism Wiki below, all of which except for "Rewriting Reality" are examples of conceptual fallacies ("Rewriting Reality" is not so much a logical error as a pre-logical metaphysical error). Following are examples of conceptual fallacies identified in the Objectivist theory of concept formation. Floating Abstraction Ayn Rand's term for concepts detached from existents, concepts that a person takes over from other men without knowing what specific units the concepts denote Frozen Abstraction Substituting some one particular concrete for the wider abstract class to which it belongs Invalid Concept Package-Deal Assuming that things often grouped together by tradition or culture must always be grouped that way Reification of Zero Regarding "nothing" as a thing, as a special, different kind of existent Rewriting Reality Attempting to alter the metaphysically given Stolen Concept Attempting to undermine the concept itself by attacking the hierarchial root(s) upon which it depend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEgoist Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 Well, Ayn Rand coined the fallacy of stolen concept. But yes, Objectivists would recognize other regular logical fallacies (ad hominem, post hoc ergo propter hoc, appeal to emotion, etc.). Strictly speaking, many of these are not themselves logical fallacies, in the colloquial sense of the term. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vox Rationis Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 Strictly speaking, many of these are not themselves logical fallacies, in the colloquial sense of the term. No, they are all logical fallacies. There are three kinds of logical fallacies: formal fallacies (having to do only with the form, not the content of the argument), such as affirming the consequent; informal fallacies (fallacies in the method of going from premises to conclusion), such as equivocation; and ignoratio elenchi (irrelevant conclusion, really a subtype of informal fallacies), such as argumentum ad hominem. Although some academics only consider formal fallacies "real" fallacies, that would not be the "colloquial" sense of the term. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.