tadmjones Posted November 19, 2012 Report Share Posted November 19, 2012 any takers tautology or basic understanding? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tadmjones Posted November 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2012 (edited) ok maybe more like tautology vs fundamental understanding ok maybe tautology vs zeigtist whatever Edited November 20, 2012 by tadmjones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tadmjones Posted November 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2012 (edited) what if descibed this topic as either Peikoff's parlor games or Kelley's Konomdrums? You know with the advent of the holiday's? Edited November 20, 2012 by tadmjones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dream_weaver Posted November 20, 2012 Report Share Posted November 20, 2012 (edited) To start with, epistemology is a science to discover the laws governing knowledge. Hierarchy is a structure recognized within knowledge. Architecture can be a way to indicate what way you want someone to regard a building, such as a house, skyscraper, etc. Gravity is what holds it to the ground. Given that take on the key elements introduced, how are you deriving that A:B as C:D? Edited November 20, 2012 by dream_weaver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tadmjones Posted November 22, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 22, 2012 My thinking was that epistemology requires, is dependent on hierarchy in the same way architecture is dependent on gravity. And that both sciences develope based on the requisite foundations, though understanding of the base can /does happen post developement? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts