Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Potential solution to banking crisis

Rate this topic


solution checker

Recommended Posts

Is that what you think innovation is? Guessing?

The Wright brothers guessed that making a flying machine (airplane) was possible. They had absolutely no way to know for sure, so yes, I think guessing and then checking is an essential part of innovation... my name is solution checker for a reason, I came here to have my solution checked to see what arguments in favor or against it would come up. It seems what you have been trying to say is: "It's too complex to predict the consequences, and often government involvement has a lot of unwanted side effects, so there's no use in having this discussion." So your message is clear enough. I welcome you to re-enter the discussion with arguments regarding the economic subjects sNerd and I are discussing, because I'm not here to discuss the meaning of the word 'guessing'.

When it comes to control, day-to-day bureaucratic membership and power over others -- the real distinguishing features -- the Fed is indistinguishable from a government regulatory agency.

Hi sNerd, I remain curious about your sources. I've named the Supreme Court, Wikipedia and congressman Ron Paul to back up my idea that the FED is essentially a privately owned institution, together with the argument that a government cannot be in debt of itself. Yet you keep your opinion that it's not private, and even if it were, it wouldn't matter because still it would be the government calling the shots. Moreover, you say on a bureaucratic level it is indistinguishable for other government regulatory agencies. However, the FED themselve point out some clear differences on their website:

"It is considered an independent central bank because its monetary policy decisions do not have to be approved by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branches of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms."

I would also welcome other readers to state their opinion on whether or not they think the FED should be considered a federal or a private institution. The answer 'It's part federal and part private' might be true, but it's not helpful without specifying what part is what. Thanks!

Edited by solution checker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi sNerd, I remain curious about your sources.
This is not a question of sources. This is an issue of defining what exactly you mean by a "private organization". I gave all my reasons above.

BTW *you* pointed to a Fed page, so I looked at it and this is what is said:

The Federal Reserve System fulfills its public mission as an independent entity within government. It is not "owned" by anyone and is not a private, profit-making institution.

As the nation's central bank, the Federal Reserve derives its authority from the Congress of the United States. It is considered an independent central bank because its monetary policy decisions do not have to be approved by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branches of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms.

However, the Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by the Congress, which often reviews the Federal Reserve's activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute. Therefore, the Federal Reserve can be more accurately described as "independent within the government" rather than "independent of government."

The 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks, which were established by the Congress as the operating arms of the nation's central banking system, are organized similarly to private corporations--possibly leading to some confusion about "ownership." For example, the Reserve Banks issue shares of stock to member banks. However, owning Reserve Bank stock is quite different from owning stock in a private company. The Reserve Banks are not operated for profit, and ownership of a certain amount of stock is, by law, a condition of membership in the System. The stock may not be sold, traded, or pledged as security for a loan; dividends are, by law, 6 percent per year.

Are you presenting the above as proof that the Fed is private?

Edited by softwareNerd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you presenting the above as proof that the Fed is private?

No, I'm presenting the above as proof that it is distinct from other government regulatory agencies. Like I said, the FED themselves prefer to be very vague about their ownership. By the way, I just came across a partly similar discussion here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I'm presenting the above as proof that it is distinct from other government regulatory agencies. Like I said, the FED themselves prefer to be very vague about their ownership. By the way, I just came across a partly similar discussion here.
I decided to create a fresh topic.

I doubt I have any more to add, but since this question comes up from time to time, and since idiots like Ron Paul make this popular, I figure it deserves a topic of its own.

Edited by softwareNerd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Wright brothers guessed that making a flying machine (airplane) was possible.

No, they didn't.

They had absolutely no way to know for sure,

Yes, they did.

The Wright Brothers were successful in building a flying machine (as others failed around them) precisely because they didn't guess. They instead studied the laws of physics, actual flight (of birds) and past human successes (with gliding).

Humans have been guessing how to fly long before the early 20th century. The reason why they never succeeded (and could never have succeeded) was because guessing does not and cannot work to engineer a solution to a complex problem like human flight. What is required is knowledge of the driving principles behind the problem.

I'm not here to discuss the meaning of the word 'guessing'

There's no disagreement on the meaning of the word. The disagreement is on whether it's a useful method for solving problems.

Realizing that it isn't begins some time in elementary school, when kids are presented with their first math problems. That is where teachers have a responsibility to eliminate guessing from every student's repertoire of methods to solve those problems (by creating problems that can't be guessed, or, if that's impossible, by never accepting a guess as the answer - not even when it's the right answer).

Has no teacher ever told you to stop guessing in class? If they didn't, then that's on them. It really is a shame that there's a learning institution out there that equates creativity with guessing.

Edited by Nicky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...