Darrell Cody Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 One fiercely anti-mysticism movie. The most blunt movie I have seen on this subject. Who else saw it and liked it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicky Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 I did. It was a good movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ppw Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 It's fiercely nihilist if anything. As one IMDb poster summed up quite brilliantly when discussing the meaning of the title: "Yeah, Lian Neeson wears a grey sweater throughout the movie, and the color is washed out of most of the photography in post production. There's also a lot of shots of grey indistinct exteriors, most of the men have either salt-and-pepper hair or ice in their hair that makes it look grey, and there's the scene where Ottway is yelling at God, and he stares up into the grey, cloudy sky. It's pretty clear that "The Grey" is actually a reference to both the existential and emotional condition of man as he confronts death, and to the natural world's indifferent disposition toward humanity, and to the uncertainty and indistinctness associated with death. It's a loaded title. The main wolves in the movie don't even look like grey wolves." The poem supposed to convey the central theme of the movie "Once more into the fray, Into the last good fight I'll ever know, Live and die on this day, Live and die on this day." is about willful, deliberate self-annulment, as an end in itself. Self-sacrifice "Kantian style". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicky Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 The poem supposed to convey the central theme of the movie "Once more into the fray, Into the last good fight I'll ever know, Live and die on this day, Live and die on this day." is about willful, deliberate self-annulment, as an end in itself. Self-sacrifice "Kantian style". No, it's not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairnet Posted December 25, 2012 Report Share Posted December 25, 2012 That doesn't sounds nihilistic ppw. That quote makes the movie sounds like a Jack London story, who was one of the best naturalist writers (imo). The idea of nature being supreme was a very big idea in his works and some others like Stephen Crane (who could be considered much more nihilistic than London). I haven't seen the movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Cody Posted December 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2012 It's fiercely nihilist if anything. As one IMDb poster summed up quite brilliantly when discussing the meaning of the title: "Yeah, Lian Neeson wears a grey sweater throughout the movie, and the color is washed out of most of the photography in post production. There's also a lot of shots of grey indistinct exteriors, most of the men have either salt-and-pepper hair or ice in their hair that makes it look grey, and there's the scene where Ottway is yelling at God, and he stares up into the grey, cloudy sky. It's pretty clear that "The Grey" is actually a reference to both the existential and emotional condition of man as he confronts death, and to the natural world's indifferent disposition toward humanity, and to the uncertainty and indistinctness associated with death. It's a loaded title. The main wolves in the movie don't even look like grey wolves." The poem supposed to convey the central theme of the movie "Once more into the fray, Into the last good fight I'll ever know, Live and die on this day, Live and die on this day." is about willful, deliberate self-annulment, as an end in itself. Self-sacrifice "Kantian style". There is nothing about self-sacrifice in this movie, explicitly or implicitly, whatsoever. It is about man's will to survive and live. FeatherFall 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ppw Posted December 26, 2012 Report Share Posted December 26, 2012 There is nothing about self-sacrifice in this movie, explicitly or implicitly, whatsoever. It is about man's will to survive and live. Yes, and about how completely impotent that will is in the face of existence. they spend the entire movie fighting for their lives, only to get slowly picked off, one by one. instead of finding shelter or encountering humans, they end up at the source of all of their deaths, precisely what they were trying to get away from the entire time, thus cementing their fate. the main character, in the end, concludes that nothing really matters but "the fight" to stay alive, without any reference to values, purpose, goals or anything remotely connected to the mind. but the movie tells us that even that doesn't matter, because they all die in the end. metaphysical importance is ascribed to death (the poem is but one reference). Death is viewed as a valid goal. (Similarly to Mr. Smith saying "the purpose of life is to die".) I don't mean 'self-sacrifice' in the usual sense of giving up a bigger value for a lesser value, or even giving up life for some prescribed "noble" goal (e.g. like Christ), that's why I gave it a different term. I mean it in the worst possible sense: shutting down the mind, leaving it all to automatized materialistic self-sustaining action, and hoping for an early death. That's what his dad was about, it's what the poem was about, it's what the Communists tried to achieve in man (destruction of the ego), and it's nihilism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeatherFall Posted December 26, 2012 Report Share Posted December 26, 2012 PPW, I didn't get that from the movie. What I took from it was that even though death was inevitable, it was unimportant when contrasted with life. The will to live was the central theme of the movie; even when the characters resigned themselves to death, they chose to focus on what mattered in the time they had left. So in other words, I couldn't disagree with you more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ppw Posted December 26, 2012 Report Share Posted December 26, 2012 Hah, just check out what the movie inspired a commenter on YT (watch?v=ZZPFp19AOKI) to write up: "Another day i rise to the fight Another day i wait for the end A day when i rest and never rise again Is the day i long for till i meet my end" It's almost eerie how closely it matches what I was arguing about. This is what people take away from the movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeatherFall Posted December 27, 2012 Report Share Posted December 27, 2012 Well, people obviously take away different things. So... ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Cody Posted December 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2012 (edited) Yes, and about how completely impotent that will is in the face of existence. they spend the entire movie fighting for their lives, only to get slowly picked off, one by one. instead of finding shelter or encountering humans, they end up at the source of all of their deaths, precisely what they were trying to get away from the entire time, thus cementing their fate. the main character, in the end, concludes that nothing really matters but "the fight" to stay alive, without any reference to values, purpose, goals or anything remotely connected to the mind. but the movie tells us that even that doesn't matter, because they all die in the end. metaphysical importance is ascribed to death (the poem is but one reference). Death is viewed as a valid goal. (Similarly to Mr. Smith saying "the purpose of life is to die".) I don't mean 'self-sacrifice' in the usual sense of giving up a bigger value for a lesser value, or even giving up life for some prescribed "noble" goal (e.g. like Christ), that's why I gave it a different term. I mean it in the worst possible sense: shutting down the mind, leaving it all to automatized materialistic self-sustaining action, and hoping for an early death. That's what his dad was about, it's what the poem was about, it's what the Communists tried to achieve in man (destruction of the ego), and it's nihilism. PPW - did you see the last scene of the movie, which comes after the end credits? There is no indication that Ottway's character dies. That is left open; and frankly, with a knife electric taped to one hand and 3 glass bottles as brass knuckles taped to the other, I gave that wolf about zero chances out of 10 to beat Ottway. Ottway no doubt smacked that Alpha wolf down and then smoked him. See the IMDb trivia page, and note - after the end credits - you can hear Ottway's breathing AND the wolf, who is obviously dying, so, with respect, I think you stand corrected. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1601913/trivia Go Ottway! Go human beings! "That's why we're at the top of the food chain!" Boo-ya! I bet he made that wolf into a wolfburger sandwich. Edited December 27, 2012 by Darrell Cody Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ppw Posted December 27, 2012 Report Share Posted December 27, 2012 PPW - did you see the last scene of the movie, which comes after the end credits? Even if he did survive, they didn't choose to make that a point in the movie, did they? No, his survival was irrelevant, the creators wanted us to know. They did, however, show us him preparing a tiny altar to his wife and kissing her goodbye, then putting gloomy music over it. His preparations for the fight were more in line with him making a last stand out of desperation than actually gearing up to win. But even if he did win, the rest of the pack would come back and finish the job, and I'm basing this on the pure viciousness of the creatures portrayed in the movie, not on general knowledge of wolf behavior. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicky Posted December 27, 2012 Report Share Posted December 27, 2012 (edited) Even if he did survive, they didn't choose to make that a point in the movie, did they? No, his survival was irrelevant, the creators wanted us to know. Movies are not about the ending. They're about what happens in them. And in this one, a group of people fight valiantly for survival. And they do much more than fight. Adversity brings them together, and makes them better human beings. In contrast to the scenes leading up to the crash, they show warmness, honor and determination. The ending is left open precisely because the creators didn't want viewers to jump to the kind of conclusions you're jumping to. It doesn't matter whether he survives or not. Good movies aren't supposed to be defined by their last few seconds. Any idiot can make an irrelevant movie and add a poignant few seconds to it at the end. Happy endings are a cheap device for people who lack the talent to fill 100 to 150 minutes with inspiring content. Edited December 27, 2012 by Nicky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Cody Posted December 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2012 (edited) Wait a minute - I would like to know - who else besides me waited until after the credits to see if there was additional footage? Ever since X Men The Last Stand I do that, and it is paying off more and more. And who else liked that he challenged God to give him a sign, and then nothing happens? "Damn faith! Earn it!" That is a pretty strong anti-religion statement. Edited December 27, 2012 by Darrell Cody Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeatherFall Posted December 28, 2012 Report Share Posted December 28, 2012 What some of what Dennis Harden wrote in his post #14 in Les Miserables' thread is apropos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Cody Posted December 31, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2012 What some of what Dennis Harden wrote in his post #14 in Les Miserables' thread is apropos. Yes, it was. Apropos - good word! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ppw Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 Movies are not about the ending. They're about what happens in them. And in this one, a group of people fight valiantly for survival. And they do much more than fight. Adversity brings them together, and makes them better human beings. In contrast to the scenes leading up to the crash, they show warmness, honor and determination. I disagree with your premise that suffering instills virtuous character. It doesn't. The ending is left open precisely because the creators didn't want viewers to jump to the kind of conclusions you're jumping to. It doesn't matter whether he survives or not. Good movies aren't supposed to be defined by their last few seconds. Any idiot can make an irrelevant movie and add a poignant few seconds to it at the end. Happy endings are a cheap device for people who lack the talent to fill 100 to 150 minutes with inspiring content. Do try to differentiate "jumping to conclusions" from "forming a definite interpretation". I've provided ample reasons why my conclusion is the way it is. Also, and this is the last thing I'm going to say in this topic: ambiguous endings definitely do not serve to provoke thought, on the contrary, they serve to paralyze it. They are a cheap device of non-objective art, a trope whose proponents claim that it "lets the mind fill the emptiness with its own content", or in other words, making art subjective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicky Posted January 4, 2013 Report Share Posted January 4, 2013 I disagree with your premise that suffering instills virtuous character. That's all you've got? A straw man? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Benner Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 (edited) To me, the entire film was human history in a nut-shell: it is only through never-ending struggle do we gain value. Sacrifice, pain, strapping on the broken liquor bottles to face a fight we can't win... doing it anyway... this is what it means to be a human being. Suffering doesn't build character, perserverance does. It was beautiful. Edited January 5, 2013 by Justin Benner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.