Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

An American professor defends Stalin

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

The message below has been posted at our university forum. The author once accused me of spreading cold war propaganda (referring to my two books).
 
Ludwik Kowalski, author of "Diary of a Former Communist"
 
 
=================================
 
” March 7 2013
 
To the Editor:
 
Istvan Deak’s review “Could Stalin Have Been Stopped?” (NYRB March 13 2013 - http://www.nybooks.c...…topped/?page=1) is filled with statements about Soviet history that are factually false. Here is a partial list:
 
* There was no “intentional killing by starvation of millions of Ukrainians” by Stalin. Every Western expert rejects the “Holodomor” myth, which originated with pro-Nazi Ukrainian nationalists in the 1950s.
 
* Stalin did not “shoot hundreds of thousands of imaginary political enemies in the later 1930s.” NKVD chief Nikolai Ezhov did so, as a part of his conspiracy against the Soviet government. In 1939-40 he and over a hundred of his top NKVD men were tried and executed for these horrific crimes.
 
* Stalin did not “attempt” to “eliminate much of the Polish leadership”. It was the Nazis who did so, in their “AB-Aktion.”
 
* There exists an important dispute over who shot the Poles in the murders known as the Katyn Massacre and good evidence that the Soviets shot some Polish POWs and the Germans later shot the rest.
 
* Stalin was not a “dictator.” He worked collaboratively with other Politburo members and was sometimes defeated. Stephen G. Wheatcroft has termed Stalin’s prewar method of rule “Team Stalin.”
 
* There were no “combined Nazi and Soviet invasions.” The Red Army did not “invade Poland” on September 17 1939. Abandoned by its government the Soviets had to prevent the German army from marching up to the existing Soviet border, something no country would have permitted. Winston Churchill said that the Soviets were right to do so.
 
* Though armed and equipped by the Soviet Union in 1941-42 the “anti-Nazi army formed by General Władysław Anders” refused to fight the Nazis until 1944.
 
* The Polish Home Army”, riddled with anti-Semitism, shot Jews escaping from the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of 1943 and collaborated with the German army against the Red Army.
 
* American and British pilots were not “routinely denied landing rights” when “trying to help the Home Army.” They were denied such rights for a few weeks in August-September 1944 because, like General Władysław Anders, Stalin considered the Warsaw Uprising to be a crime against the Polish people.
 
* There is no evidence that the Soviets “massacred thousands of innocent” Poles.
 
A Hungarian, Deak fails to mention that Hungary invaded the Soviet Union side by side with Nazi Germany, and Hungarian forces murdered at least hundreds of thousands of innocent Soviet citizens, including many Jews.
 
Grover Furr, Montclair State University “ 
Link to post
Share on other sites

The title of this topic is a bit misleading. It doesn't seem that he is defending Stalin, it seems like he is defending the truth (not sure if what he disputes is true).

Stalin was an evil man. But that doesn't warrant lies to be made about him. For example, if you claim he murdered kittens and ate them for dinner, and I said no, that isn't factually accurate --- that doesn't mean I am defending him. I am defending the truth and to say anything else would be your attempt to unfairly discredit my assertions.

Edited by thenelli01
Link to post
Share on other sites

The title of this topic is a bit misleading. It doesn't seem that he is defending Stalin, it seems like he is defending the truth (not sure if what he disputes is true).

Stalin was an evil man. But that doesn't warrant lies to be made about him. For example, if you claim he murdered kittens and ate them for dinner, and I said no, that isn't factually accurate --- that doesn't mean I am defending him. I am defending the truth and to say anything else would be your attempt to unfairly discredit my assertions.

Except that what he is defending isn't the truth. Stalin did in fact do all those things he's claiming he didn't do. Just the Wikipedia article on Stalin alone has enough references (from his pact with Hitler to proof of his crimes both against Russians and other nations) to show that what that man is doing is blatant evasion.

Edited by Nicky
Link to post
Share on other sites

On a side note, it did reignite my interest in world war 2.

 

Then you might be interested in "The Chief Culprit: Stalin's Grand Design to Start World War II" by Viktor Suvorov, who presents in his book a very intriguing theory about why the Soviet Army was so badly beaten in the first months after June 22, 1941. There is a recent paperback edition of this book.

 

From the book description: "Suvorov debunks the theory that Stalin was duped by Hitler and that the Soviet Union was a victim of Nazi aggression. Instead, he makes the case that Stalin neither feared Hitler nor mistakenly trusted him..."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...