Jump to content
Objectivism Online Forum

Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epist


Recommended Posts

Someone just informed me of a new book on Objectivist Epistemology.
Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology
Edited by Allan Gotthelf and James G. Lennox

 

The descriptive blurb on Amazon says:

 

The philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand (1905–1982) is a cultural phenomenon. Her books have sold more than twenty-eight million copies, and countless individuals speak of her writings as having significantly influenced their lives. Despite her popularity, Rand’s philosophy of Objectivism has received little serious attention from academic philosophers.

Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge offers scholarly analysis of key elements of Ayn Rand’s radically new approach to epistemology. The four essays, by contributors intimately familiar with this area of her work, discuss Rand’s theory of concepts—including its new account of abstraction and essence—and its central role in her epistemology; how that view leads to a distinctive conception of the justification of knowledge; her realist account of perceptual awareness and its role in the acquisition of knowledge; and finally, the implications of that theory for understanding the growth of scientific knowledge. The volume concludes with critical commentary on the essays by distinguished philosophers with differing philosophical viewpoints and the author’s responses to those commentaries.

This is the second book published in Ayn Rand Society Philosophical Studies, which was developed in conjunction with the Ayn Rand Society to offer a fuller scholarly understanding of this highly original and influential thinker. The Ayn Rand Society, an affiliated group of the American Philosophical Association, Eastern Division, seeks to foster scholarly study by philosophers of the philosophical thought and writings of Ayn Rand. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is reformatted from The Ayn Rand Society

 

Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology


Allan Gotthelf, editor
James G. Lennox associate editor
Gregory Salmieri, consulting editor
Pittsburgh University Press, 2012

 

CONTENTS

Preface  
PART ONE  
Ayn Rand's Theory of Concepts: Rethinking Abstraction and Essence 

Allan Gotthelf


Conceptualization and Justification 

Gregory Salmieri


Perceptual Awareness as Presentational 

Onkar Ghate
 

Concepts, Context, and the Advance of Science 

James G. Lennox
 

PART TWO  
Concepts and Kinds  


Rand on Concepts, Definitions, and the Advance of Science: Comments on Gotthelf and Lennox 

Paul E. Griffiths


Natural Kinds and Rand's Theory of Concepts: Reflections on Griffiths

Onkar Ghate
 

Definitions  
 

Rand on Definitions--"One Size Fits All"? 

Jim Bogen


Taking the Measure of a Definition: Response to Bogen

Allan Gotthelf
 

Concepts and Theory Change  


On Concepts that Change with the Advance of Science 

Richard Burian
 

Conceptual Development versus Conceptual Change:Response to Burian

James G. Lennox
 

Perceptual Awareness  
In Defense of the Theory of Appearing: Comments on Ghate and Salmieri

Pierre LeMorvan
 

Forms of Awareness and "Three-Factor" Theories

Gregory Salmieri
 

Direct Realism and Salmieri's "Forms of Awareness" 

Bill Brewer
 

Keeping up Appearances: Reflections on the Debate Over Perceptual Infallibilism

Benjamin Bayer


Uniform Abbreviations of Works
References
List of Contributors
Index

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

This book will be out in a few days. I just finished reading a pre-print version that Gotthelf let me read, and it is quite informative. The audience it is written for seems to be people familiar with perceptual psychology, cognitive development, philosophy in terms of perception, or Objectivist epistemology. So, it's not an easy read because of how abstract the topic is. Even still, the chapters on perceptual awareness were the most interesting to me, and there are good essays which fairly argue against the Objectivist-position/influenced essays (they pose questions that I thought about as well). Bottom line, the book is worth a read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...